6 research outputs found

    Cloacal microbiota of barn swallows from Northern Italy

    Get PDF
    <p>Bird gut microbiota shows large variation among geographical populations of the same species – probably because, differently from mammals, gut microbiota of birds is largely affected by extrinsic factors such as diet and environmental conditions. We analysed the cloacal microbiota (CM) of 12 barn swallows (<i>Hirundo rustica</i>) from a colony in Northern Italy by high-throughput DNA sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The CMs, dominated by bacteria of the phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, did not significantly differ between adult females, adult males and fledglings. This first description of barn swallow CM in Italy, together with two previous studies from Europe, suggests that CMs of geographically different barn swallow populations are dominated by bacteria belonging to the same phyla but different genera. The intra-colony similarity of the CMs may be due to the exposure of individuals to the same local environmental conditions while on their breeding grounds.</p

    Ecological features of feather microbiota in breeding common swifts

    No full text
    <p>We provide the first-ever investigation of feather microbiota by high throughput DNA sequencing for any bird species by describing bacteria found on the innermost tertial feather of 22 adult common swifts (<i>Apus apus</i>). We found feather microbiomes with large abundance of Bacillales, Actinomycetales, Burkholderiales, Sphingobacteriales, Sphingomonadales, Rhizobiales, Pseudomonadales, Clostridiales, Rubrobacterales and Lactobacillales. Bacterial communities did not change with any feature of individual swifts. Network and cluster analysis of feather microbiomes disclosed three clusters, characterized by bacteria typical of seawater, plants and soil and unrelated to conditions at the breeding grounds. We hypothesize that feather microbiomes reflect, at least partly, airborne bacterial communities of the environments where individuals spent non-breeding periods, or of those that they crossed during migration, rather than breeding environment. If confirmed, this evidence may disclose the possibility to use feather bacteria as proxies for tracing non-breeding origin and routes of migratory birds.</p

    Potential sources of bacteria colonizing the cryoconite of an Alpine glacier

    No full text
    <div><p>We investigated the potential contribution of ice-marginal environments to the microbial communities of cryoconite holes, small depressions filled with meltwater that form on the surface of Forni Glacier (Italian Alps). Cryoconite holes are considered the most biologically active environments on glaciers. Bacteria can colonize these environments by short-range transport from ice-marginal environments or by long-range transport from distant areas. We used high throughput DNA sequencing to identify Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) present in cryoconite holes and three ice-marginal environments, the moraines, the glacier forefield, and a large (> 3 m high) ice-cored dirt cone occurring on the glacier surface. Bacterial communities of cryoconite holes were different from those of ice-marginal environments and hosted fewer OTUs. However, a network analysis revealed that the cryoconite holes shared more OTUs with the moraines and the dirt cone than with the glacier forefield. Ice-marginal environments may therefore act as sources of bacteria for cryoconite holes, but differences in environmental conditions limit the number of bacterial strains that may survive in them. At the same time, cryoconite holes host a few OTUs that were not found in any ice-marginal environment we sampled, thus suggesting that some bacterial populations are positively selected by the specific environmental conditions of the cryoconite holes.</p></div
    corecore