107 research outputs found
Supplementary Figures 1 - 4 from The AMPK Inhibitor Compound C Is a Potent AMPK-Independent Antiglioma Agent
PDF file - 589K, Figure S1. Antiproliferative effects of Compound C in glioma cells. Figure S2. Compound C induces AMPK-independent autophagy and the antiproliferative effects of Compound C are not blocked by autophagy and apoptosis inhibitors. Figure S3. Constitutively active Akt fails to block Compound C?s antiproliferative action. Figure S4. Effects of Compound C on glioma cell cycle.</p
C1 sensitizes GBM cells to radiation-induced cell death, <i>in vitro</i>.
<p>Graph indicating the relative total cell numbers after monotherapy (1 μM C1 or radiation) or after combination therapy. Cells treated with combination therapy were radiated (2Gy or 4Gy) at 24 hours post-C1 treatment and the subsequent total cell numbers were counted at 3 days after irradiation. Data are shown from 3 separate experiments.</p
Genes in the DNA damage-induced response pathway are downregulated in Siomycin A-treated GSCs.
<p>cDNA microarray of GBM146, GBM157, and GBM206 samples treated with 1 μM Siomycin A or control (DMSO) were subjected to cluster (A) and canonical pathway analyses (D) using Ingenuity software. Log (<i>p</i>Value) of most significantly downregulated pathways are shown (<i>p</i><0.05). The most downregulated and upregulated genes in Siomycin A-treated GSCs are shown in (B) and (C), respectively. Expression of FOXM1, MELK, Aurora A/B, and Survivin were significantly decreased by Siomycin A treatment compared with DMSO treatment.</p
Figure S1-S4 from Perhexiline Demonstrates FYN-mediated Antitumor Activity in Glioblastoma
Supplementary Figures_Unmarked</p
C1 treatment accumulates GSCs in G2/M and triggers subsequent mitotic catastrophe.
<p>A, Proliferation assays on two glioblastoma cell lines (U87 and U251). U87 and U251 cells were treated with 5.7 μM C1 or DMSO. Cells were trypsinized and estimated by counting, in duplicate, after 72 h of treatment. Two different experiments were conducted with similar results. B, Time-Lapse on mitotic U251 cells stably expressing GFP was performed in the absence (DMSO) or in the presence of C1 (at 1 μM). The compound was added to the cell culture just before imaging and then cells were continuously imaged. Three independent experiments were conducted and 10 to 15 fields were followed in each. None of the followed mitotic cells divided in two daughter cells. Representative field is imaged, DNA is in blue and the merge shows GFP and DNA. Several polyploid cells were present in the image. Arrows and arrowheads in upper panels of DMSO and C1- treated cell indicate the same cells through time-lapse. The elapse times are indicated on each photo, in some assays, a zoom of one cell is shown (the red bar represents 5 μm) this cell is present on the former field and labelled with an arrow). Images in bottom panels show DNA only (left) and DNA overlap with GFP (right) after 72-hour treatment with DMSO or C1 (the red bars on each panel represent 20 μm). Arrows in the bottom panel of C1-treated cells indicate mitotic catastrophe by C1 treatment. C, Pictures demonstrate pre-mitotic phase (left panel), mitotic (mid panel) process by full karyokinesis and cytokinesis and after cell division (right panel). MELK expression was determined with immunocytochemistry of GBM1600 cells with anti-MELK antibody (red), chromatin staining with Hoechst stain (blue). Picture of pre-mitosis shows GBM1600 cells highly expressed MELK at pre-mitosis phase (400× magnification). Then GBM1600 cells were treated with 5 μM C1 or control and were subjected to immunocytochemistry 3 days later with anti-MELK and chromatin staining (640× magnification). Data were confirmed by three independent experiments. C1 treated cells are micronucleated at metaphase and followed multinuclear chromatin condensation (mid panel). Right panel show multinuclear asymmetric divided chromatin of C1 treated cell compared with DMSO treated cell. D, Flow cytometric analysis of C1- and DMSO-treated GBM1600 cells with Propidium Iodide at 3 days after treatment shows 62.7% of C1-treated cells resulted in the G2/M arrest, whereas the control cells have 19.3% of the G2/M arrested cells.E, Graph indicating the proportions of live, early apoptotic, and late apoptotic U251 cells with varying doses of C1 or DMSO.</p
C1 treatment inhibits GSC proliferation <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>.
<p>A, Graph of neurosphere forming assay indicating the relative neurosphere numbers of C1-treated patient-derived GBM samples (GBM146, GBM157, and GBM206) and normal neural progenitors (16wf). B, CD133(+) and (−) cells, separated from GBM157-derived sphere cultures, were treated with 1 μM C1 or DMSO (control) under the identical serum-free conditions for 48 hours. The effect on CD133(+) cells was assessed by the neurosphere number per well, and the effect on CD133(−) cells was assessed by the % change of the total cell number in comparison to the control sample. C, Schematic showing organotypic slice cultures explanted GBM tissues and treated with C1 or DMSO (control) for 16 hours and evaluated with H&E, Ki67, and Nestin staining. D, Immunohistochemistry of C1- or DMSO-treated GBM slice cultures with anti-Ki-67 monoclonal antibody (Original magnification, ×200). E, Graph indicating the numbers of neurospheres (left) or total cells (right) in serum-free medium derived from C1- or DMSO-treated slice cultures for 16 hours. F, Schematic drawing of the effect of C1 treatment for the mouse intracranial GBM models derived from GSCs. Cells from GBM157 spheres were injected intracranially into immunocompromised mice (C1 mice: n = 4, control mice: n = 12). At day 7 post transplantation, C1 was injected intratumorally at quantities of 2.5 pmol (n = 3), 25 pmol (n = 4), or 250 pmol (n = 5). G, Representative images for immunohistochemistry with Ki-67 staining of GBM slice cultures treated with 25 pmol C1 or DMSO at day 10 of treatment. Ki-67 positive cells in each group were analyzed automated digital image analysis (Original magnification, ×200). H, Representative images for immunohistochemistry with human-specific Nestin antibody using GBM157-derived mouse intracranial tumors treated with varying doses of C1 or DMSO intratumoral injection (bar: 1 mm). I, Graph indicates tumor sizes in each group as determined by Nestin staining intensities analyzed using automated digital image analysis.</p
Imidazo[1,2‑<i>a</i>]pyridine Derivatives as Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: Novel Chemotypes to Target Glioblastoma Stem Cells
Glioblastoma
multiforme (GBM) is the deadliest form of brain tumor.
It is known for its ability to escape the therapeutic options available
to date thanks to the presence of a subset of cells endowed with stem-like
properties and ability to resist to cytotoxic treatments. As the cytosolic
enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 turns out to be overexpressed in
these kinds of cells, playing a key role for their vitality, treatments
targeting this enzyme may represent a successful strategy to fight
GBM. In this work, we describe a novel class of imidazoÂ[1,2-a]Âpyridine derivatives as aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 inhibitors,
reporting the evidence of their significance as novel drug candidates
for the treatment of GBM. Besides showing an interesting functional
profile, in terms of activity against the target enzyme and selectivity
toward highly homologous isoenzymes, representative examples of the
series also showed a nanomolar to picomolar efficacy against patient-derived
GBM stem-like cells, thus proving the concept that targeting aldehyde
dehydrogenase might represent a novel and promising way to combat
GBM by striking its ability to divide immortally
Imidazo[1,2‑<i>a</i>]pyridine Derivatives as Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: Novel Chemotypes to Target Glioblastoma Stem Cells
Glioblastoma
multiforme (GBM) is the deadliest form of brain tumor.
It is known for its ability to escape the therapeutic options available
to date thanks to the presence of a subset of cells endowed with stem-like
properties and ability to resist to cytotoxic treatments. As the cytosolic
enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 turns out to be overexpressed in
these kinds of cells, playing a key role for their vitality, treatments
targeting this enzyme may represent a successful strategy to fight
GBM. In this work, we describe a novel class of imidazoÂ[1,2-a]Âpyridine derivatives as aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 inhibitors,
reporting the evidence of their significance as novel drug candidates
for the treatment of GBM. Besides showing an interesting functional
profile, in terms of activity against the target enzyme and selectivity
toward highly homologous isoenzymes, representative examples of the
series also showed a nanomolar to picomolar efficacy against patient-derived
GBM stem-like cells, thus proving the concept that targeting aldehyde
dehydrogenase might represent a novel and promising way to combat
GBM by striking its ability to divide immortally
Supplementary Figure 1 from Extracellular Vesicles from High-Grade Glioma Exchange Diverse Pro-oncogenic Signals That Maintain Intratumoral Heterogeneity
Supplementary Figure 1 related to Figure 1. Analysis of GSC EV proteome heterogeneity reveals coherent molecular modules.</p
Supplementary video from Extracellular Vesicles from High-Grade Glioma Exchange Diverse Pro-oncogenic Signals That Maintain Intratumoral Heterogeneity
M and P GSCs display distinct intra-spherical organization in vitro. Representative time lapse movie</p
- …