Additional file 1: of Impacts of gender, weather, and workplace differences in farm worker’s gear

Questionnaire for working clothing. It is a survey questionnaire to collect the information of farmers' working posture, clothing, accessories and auxiliary tools. (DOCX 18.5 KB

Additional file 1: of Mucosal and salivary microbiota associated with recurrent aphthous stomatitis

The comparison of the oral mucosa and saliva microbiota between the control subjects of current study and HMP subjects at the phylum level. (PDF 428 kb

Additional file 3: Table S2. of Improving gastric cancer preclinical studies using diverse in vitro and in vivo model systems

Stage comparison according to ERBB2 expression in Asian (GEO accession: GSE36968). For comparisons, we used one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. In the Asian dataset, there were no significant differences between stages according to ERBB2 expression. (DOC 89 kb

Additional file 4: Figure S2A. of Improving gastric cancer preclinical studies using diverse in vitro and in vivo model systems

According to gastric cancer disease stage, ERBB2 expression in Asian (GEO accession: GSE36968) and Caucasian (GEO accession: GSE63288) datasets. a Box plots depicting ERBB2 expression in the Asian dataset (GEO accession: GSE36968). The x-axis represents stages and the y-axis is the logarithm of RPKM (a measure of gene expression). b Box plots depicting ERBB2 expression in the Caucasian dataset (GEO accession: GSE63288). The dataset did not contain stage IV patients. The x-axis represents GC disease stages and the y-axis is the logarithm of RPKMs. (DOC 88 kb

Additional file 1: Figure S1A. of Improving gastric cancer preclinical studies using diverse in vitro and in vivo model systems

Of 38 gastric cancer cell lines, we found that NCI-N87 cells, the basis for most preclinical anti-ERBB2 studies, had the highest ERBB2 expression level. (DOC 152 kb

Additional file 5: Table S3. of Improving gastric cancer preclinical studies using diverse in vitro and in vivo model systems

Stage comparison according to ERBB2 expression in Caucasian (GEO accession: GSE63288). For comparisons, we used one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. In the Caucasian dataset, there were significant stage differences according to ERBB2 expression. The significant p-value was in italic. (DOC 75 kb