Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Volatile Anaesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for Cardiac Surgery—A Narrative Review

Recent research has contested the previously accepted paradigm that volatile anaesthetics improve outcomes in cardiac surgery patients when compared to intravenous anaesthesia. In this review we summarise the mechanisms of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury and cardioprotection in cardiac surgery. In addition, we make a comprehensive analysis of evidence comparing outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under volatile or intravenous anaesthesia, in terms of mortality and morbidity (cardiac, neurological, renal, pulmonary)

Impact of COVID-19 History on Patients’ Outcome in the Perioperative Period—A Systematic Review

Background: Elective surgery soon after SARS-CoV-2 infection is linked to high morbidity, but the risk > 7 weeks post-infection is uncertain. Methods: A PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42023416842) following PRISMA 2020 searched PubMed, Web of Science, WHO COVID Database, Wiley, Google Scholar, and Scopus (Jane 2020–July 2025) for studies reporting postoperative outcomes in patients with confirmed COVID-19 ≥ 7 weeks before elective surgery. Primary endpoints were cardiopulmonary, neurological, renal and thrombotic complications, ICU/hospital stay and 30-day mortality. Results: Thirteen observational studies (38,055 patients) met inclusion criteria. In patients operated ≥7 weeks after mild or asymptomatic infection, overall mortality rate was 2.27% (607/26,688), with no significant excess versus uninfected controls. Pneumonia (1.66%), pulmonary embolism (1.47%), arrhythmias (2.57%) and myocardial injury (1.06%)—did not exceed baseline surgical rates. Thrombosis occurred in 2.8% but lacked a clear association with prior infection. Conversely, individuals with previous moderate-to-severe disease or recent COVID-19-related hospitalization showed higher complication rates, especially in complex procedures such as coronary bypass. Conclusions: Evidence to date indicates that COVID-19 history beyond seven weeks does not independently raise perioperative morbidity or mortality for most elective procedures

Less (Transfusion) Is More—Enhancing Recovery through Implementation of Patient Blood Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective, Single-Centre Study of 1174 Patients

Introduction: The implementation of Patient Blood Management (PBM) in cardiac surgery has been shown to be effective in reducing blood transfusions and associated complications, as well as improving patient outcomes. Despite the potential benefits of PBM in cardiac surgery, there are several barriers to its successful implementation. Objectives: The main objectives of this study were to ascertain the impact of the national Romanian PBM recommendations on allogeneic blood product transfusion in cardiac surgery and identify predictors of perioperative packed red blood cell transfusion. Methods: As part of the Romanian national pilot programme of PBM, we performed a single-centre, retrospective study in a tertiary centre of cardiovascular surgery, including patients from two time periods, before and after the implementation of the national recommendations. Using coarsened exact matching, from a total of 1174 patients, 157 patients from the before group were matched to 169 patients in the after group. Finally, we built a multivariate regression model from the entire cohort to analyse independent predictors of PRBC transfusion in the perioperative period. Results: Although there was a trend towards a lower proportion of patients requiring PRBC transfusion in the “after” group compared to the “before” group (44.9%vs. 50.3%), it was not statistically significant. There was a significant difference between the “after” group and the “before” group in terms of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion rates, with a lower percentage of patients requiring FFP transfusion in the “after” group compared to “before” (14.2%, vs. 22.9%, p = 0.04). This difference was also seen in the total perioperative FFP transfusion (mean transfusion 0.7 units in the “before” group, SD 1.73 vs. 0.38 units in the “after” group, SD 1.05, p = 0.04). In the multivariate regression analysis, age > 64 years (OR 1.652, 95% CI 1.17–2.331, p = 0.004), female sex (OR 2.404, 95% CI 1.655–3.492, p < 0.001), surgery time (OR 1.295, 95% CI 1.126–1.488, p < 0.001), Hb < 13 g/dl (OR 3.611, 95% CI 2.528–5.158, p < 0.001), re-exploration for bleeding (OR 3.988, 95% CI 1.248–12.738, p = 0.020), viscoelastic test use (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.34–3.544, p < 0.001), FFP transfusion (OR 4.023, 95% CI 2.426–6.671, p < 0.001), and use of a standardized pretransfusion checklist (OR 8.875, 95% CI 5.496–14.332, p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with PRBC transfusion. The use of a preoperative standardized haemostasis questionnaire was independently associated with a decreased risk of perioperative PRBC transfusion (0.565, 95% CI 0.371–0.861, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Implementation of national PBM recommendations led to a reduction in FFP transfusion in a cardiac surgery centre. The use of a preoperative standardized haemostasis questionnaire is an independent predictor of a lower risk for PRBC transfusion in this setting

Imaging in Large Vessel Vasculitis—A Narrative Review

Vasculitis refers to a group of rare conditions characterized by the inflammation of blood vessels, affecting multiple systems. It presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to its broad clinical manifestations. Vasculitis is classified based on the size of the affected vessels: small, medium, large, or variable-sized. Large vessel vasculitis (LVV), particularly giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK), has garnered attention due to its significant morbidity and mortality. Both conditions involve immune-mediated inflammation of the vascular wall, despite differing in epidemiology and presentation. Early identification is crucial to prevent complications like organ ischemia and hemorrhage. Diagnostic accuracy can be hampered by false negative results, making comprehensive investigation essential. Vascular imaging, including computed tomography angiography (CTA), ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), is key in diagnosing vasculitis, revealing vessel wall thickening and other suggestive features. This article reviews typical and atypical CT and CTA findings in LVV, discusses imaging modalities, and highlights their role in therapeutic management and prognosis. It emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and the critical role of radiologists in improving patient outcomes in LVV