Table1_The importance of liver function assessment before cardiac surgery: A narrative review.docx

The demand for cardiac surgery procedures is increasing globally. Thanks to an improvement in survival driven by medical advances, patients with liver disease undergo cardiac surgery more often. Liver disease is associated with the development of heart failure, especially in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Cardiovascular risk factors can also contribute to the development of both cardiomyopathy and liver disease and heart failure itself can worsen liver function. Despite the risk that liver disease and cirrhosis represent for the perioperative management of patients who undergo cardiac surgery, liver function is often not included in common risk scores for preoperative evaluation. These patients have worse short and long-term survival when compared with other cardiac surgery populations. Preoperative evaluation of liver function, postoperative management and close postoperative follow-up are crucial for avoiding complications and improving results. In the present narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiological components related with postoperative complications and mortality in patients with liver disease who undergo cardiac surgery and provide recommendations for the perioperative management.</p

DataSheet_1_The effect of reparixin on survival in patients at high risk for in-hospital mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.docx

IntroductionA great number of anti-inflammatory drugs have been suggested in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Reparixin, a non-competitive allosteric inhibitor of the CXCL8 (IL-8) receptors C-X-C chemokine receptor type 1 (CXCR1) and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CXCR2), has already been tried out as a treatment in different critical settings. Due to the contrasting existing literature, we decided to perform the present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the effect of the use of reparixin on survival in patients at high risk for in-hospital mortality.MethodsWe created a search strategy to include any human RCTs performed with reparixin utilization in patients at high risk for in-hospital mortality, excluding oncological patients. Two trained, independent authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for appropriate studies. Furthermore, references of review articles and included RCTs were screened to identify more studies. No language restrictions were enforced. To assess the risk of bias of included trials, the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used.ResultsOverall, six studies were included and involved 406 patients (220 received reparixin and 186 received the comparator). The all-cause mortality in the reparixin group was significantly lower than that in the control group [5/220 (2.3%) in the reparixin group vs. 12/186 (6.5%) in the control group, odds ratio = 0.33 (95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.96), p-value for effect 0.04, p for heterogeneity 0.20, I2 = 36%]. In addition, no difference in the rate of pneumonia, sepsis, or non-serious infections was shown between the two groups.ConclusionOur meta-analysis of randomized trials suggests that short-term inhibition of CXCL8 activity improved survival in patients at high risk for in-hospital mortality without increasing the risk of infection.Meta-analysis registrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42021254467.</p

Could CPAP Devices Be Used to Ventilate Cardiac Arrest Patients? A Bench Study

To investigate the potential efficacy of a commercial continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilator to provide effective respiratory support in a simulated scenario of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The study was conducted on a high-fidelity manikin (SimMan 3 GTM, Laerdal, NOR) connected to the ASL 5000TM Lung Simulator (IngMar Medical, USA). To simulate OHCA, we set no spontaneous respiratory acts and physiological respiratory system resistance (13 cmH2O/L.sec) and compliance (50 mL/cmH2O). The Respironics BiPAP A40 ventilatorI (Philips, NL) was used to provide ventilatory support while operating in CPAP mode. Tests were performed at different values of positive pressure of the CPAP ventilator (PCPAP: 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15 cmH2O) and the intrapulmonary volume (tidal volume, Vt) measured via the simulator software computer interface. A trained physician performed the tests. Our primary outcome was a VT of ≈500-600 mL with an intermittent maneuver simulating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)-like ventilatory support practice according to international guideline-based target (1-sec ventilation followed by 1-sec pause). In intermittent ventilatory support tests, PCPAP levels of 12.5, and 15 cmH2O resulted in a VT equal to 508 ± 13 mL, and 557 ± 44 mL respectively (p = 0.04), thus approaching the VT target. We provide preliminary evidence of the potential efficacy of CPAP ventilators designed for home use to provide effective respiratory support to a simulated respiratory arrest patient.</p

Additional file 2 of Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Additional file 2. Complete reference list of included studies

Additional file 1 of Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Additional file 1. Search strategy, supplemental Tables, and supplemental Figures

Evaluation_form_1_-_Supplemental_material – Supplemental material for Development of a prototype anti-pollution filter for volatile anesthetics

Supplemental material, Evaluation_form_1_-_Supplemental_material for Development of a prototype anti-pollution filter for volatile anesthetics by Caetano Nigro Neto, Aron Jose Pazin Andrade, Edir Leal, Francisco Jose Lucena Bezerra, Vladimir Lomivorotov and Giovanni Landoni in The International Journal of Artificial Organs</p

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest System-of-Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed healthcare systems and diverted resources allocated for other conditions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyse how the pandemic impacted the system-of-care of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase up to May 31, 2021, for studies comparing out-of-hospital cardiac arrests that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic versus a non-pandemic period. Survival at hospital discharge or at 30 days was the primary outcome. Results: We included 24 studies for a total of 75,952 patients. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during COVID-19 pandemic had lower survival (19 studies; 603/11,666 [5.2%] vs. 1320/17,174 [7.7%]; OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44–0.65; P = 0.001) and return of spontaneous circulation (4370/24353 [18%] vs. 7401/34510 [21%]; OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55–0.75; P P P  Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic affected the system-of-care of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and patients had worse short-term outcomes compared to pre-pandemic periods. Advanced airway management strategy shifted from endotracheal intubation to supraglottic airway devices. PROSPERO CRD42021250339.</p

Overall results.

Overall results.</p

Study characteristics.

Study characteristics.</p

Non-Invasive Ventilation in the Prehospital Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Noninvasive ventilation is a well-established treatment for acute respiratory failure, being increasingly applied in the prehospital setting. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate whether early prehospital initiation of noninvasive ventilation reduces mortality compared to standard oxygen therapy. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 7th, 2022, for studies comparing prehospital noninvasive ventilation performed by emergency medical services versus standard oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available. We included ten randomized studies and two quasi-randomized studies for a total of 1485 patients. Prehospital treatment with noninvasive ventilation compared with standard oxygen therapy did not significantly reduce mortality at the longest follow-up available (107/810 [13%] vs 114/772 [15%]; RR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70–1.13; P = 0.34; I2=24%). The endotracheal intubation rate was reduced when receiving prehospital noninvasive ventilation (38/776 [4.9%] vs 81/743 [11%]; RR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31–0.63; P 2=0%; number needed to treat 17). The intensive care admission rate (114/532 [21%] vs 129/507 [25%]; RR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69–1.04; P = 0.11; I2=0%) and length of hospital stay (mean difference=-1.29 days; 95% CI, −3.35–0.77; P = 0.21; I2=82%) were similar between groups. Adults with acute respiratory failure treated in the prehospital setting with noninvasive ventilation had a lower risk of intubation than those managed with standard oxygen therapy, with similar risk of death, intensive care admission, and length of hospital stay. PROSPERO CRD42021284947</p