12 research outputs found

    Identified proteins

    No full text
    Table S1A: Proteins identified in partially purified MCF-7 (CTRL) cell nuclear extracts. Table S1B: Proteins identified in partially purified CTAP-ER_ expressing MCF-7 (Sample) cell nuclear extracts. Table S1C: Proteins specifically identified in partially purified CTAP-ER_ (Sample) vs MCF7 (CTRL) nuclear extracts

    The number of single-cell states in the MCF-7 response to estrogen.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) The mean squared error of the model fit to the microarray data decreases as function of the number of states: as expected, when the number of parameters increases, the quality of the fit improves. (<b>B</b>) The condition number is a measure of the similarity of the transcriptional profiles of the states. It increases as function of the number of states, , highlighting that over-fitting also increases with . A good balance between fit quality and over-fitting must be found. (<b>C</b>) The model posterior probability, derived by a Bayesian approach, has a peak at , which shows that a model with six states strikes a good balance between fit-to-data and model parsimony.</p

    Estrogen responding genes per state.

    No full text
    <p>Among the entire gene set considered in the MCF-7 cell experiment, 1270 also responded in ZR-75.1 cells. These are referred to as common ‘estrogen-regulated genes’ (E2R genes) in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088485#pone.0088485-Cicatiello1" target="_blank">[4]</a>. ‘Primary genes’ are their subgroup having a ER transcription factor binding site within 10 kb around the TSS. The figures show how E2R and primary genes are responding across the single-cell states of a six-state model. (<b>A</b>) Fraction of up-regulated and down-regulated E2R genes. (<b>B</b>) Fraction of first-responding E2R genes, i.e., of genes that respond for the first time in a given state. (<b>C</b>) and (<b>D</b>) show the analogous pattern of primary genes.</p

    Fits to gene expression time-course data.

    No full text
    <p>The fit to some key genes, comprising the 11 primary transcription factors identified by Cicatiello et<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088485#pone.0088485-Cicatiello1" target="_blank">[4]</a> and other important estrogen-responsive genes <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088485#pone.0088485-Zhu1" target="_blank">[1]</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088485#pone.0088485-Weisz1" target="_blank">[2]</a>, are shown: black circles represent time-course (standardized) data while green lines represents the gene expression predicted by the six-state model.</p

    Marker genes in the MCF-7 system.

    No full text
    <p>In each state of a six-state model, genes are ranked by their state-expression fold change with respect to the first state. Here, only the top 50 are shown along with their ranking in the other states. For the top genes of state 2 also the rank assigned considering a maximum fold change criterion over the time course is shown for comparison (separated column). The state-based ranking criterion highlights marker genes which would otherwise pass unnoticed.</p

    The single-cell transition rates in the ZR-75.1 system.

    No full text
    <p>Results of the six-state model for time course data in hormone-starved ZR-75.1 cells responding to estrogen stimulation are shown for comparison with the MCF-7 system of <b>Fig. 3</b>. (<b>A</b>) Cell population dynamics. (<b>B</b>) Rates and mean times of transitions. In ZR-75.1 the response to estrogen is initially one order of magnitude faster than in MCF-7.</p

    Additional file 12: Table S9. of The nuclear receptor ERβ engages AGO2 in regulation of gene transcription, RNA splicing and RISC loading

    No full text
    Genes whose transcription rate is modulated by ERβ and AGO2. Table S9a. Genes showing transcriptional regulation by ERβ (Ct-ERβ vs wild type). Table S9b. Genes responding to AGO2 silencing in ERβ + cells (shAGO2 vs Ct-ERβ). Table S9c. Genes showing transcriptional regulation by both ERβ (Ct-ERβ vs wild type) and AGO2 (shAGO2 vs Ct-ERβ). Table S9d. Genes differentially expressed in Ct-ERβ vs wild-type cells harboring both ERβ and AGO2 binding sites and showing an inversion of the ERβ-induced transcriptional trend after AGO2 silencing. (XLSX 1259 kb
    corecore