Glucose control and vascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: Is the picture clear?

The overall impact of glucose lowering on vascular complications and major clinical outcomes, including mortality, in type 2 diabetes is still an open issue. While intensive glucose control has undoubted benefit for microvascular end points, the relationship between glucose-lowering approaches and reduced incidence and/or progression of macrovascular complications is less clear. This review article will discuss the effect of glucose lowering per se as well as the effects of specific glucose-lowering therapies on vascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. The role of lifestyle changes on cardiovascular outcomes will be also addressed. Recent analyses from large cardiovascular outcome studies (ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT) provide new information on factors that modulate the impact of intensive glucose lowering on outcomes, helping to identify the specific clinical characteristics of the patients receiving the intervention that would show a better response.While several studies on cardiovascular outcomes with diabetes drugs are available, they do not clearly highlight a benefit from using a specific medication or will require additional evidence, as for the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 blockers

Cross-Talk between PPARγ and Insulin Signaling and Modulation of Insulin Sensitivity

PPARγ activation in type 2 diabetic patients results in a marked improvement in insulin and glucose parameters, resulting from an improvement of whole-body insulin sensitivity. Adipose tissue is the major mediator of PPARγ action on insulin sensitivity. PPARγ activation in mature adipocytes induces the expression of a number of genes involved in the insulin signaling cascade, thereby improving insulin sensitivity. PPARγ is the master regulator of adipogenesis, thereby stimulating the production of small insulin-sensitive adipocytes. In addition to its importance in adipogenesis, PPARγ plays an important role in regulating lipid, metabolism in mature adipocytes by increasing fatty acid trapping. Finally, adipose tissue produces several cytokines that regulate energy homeostasis, lipid and glucose metabolism. Disturbances in the production of these factors may contribute to metabolic abnormalities, and PPARγ activation is also associated with beneficial effects on expression and secretion of a whole range of cytokines

Effects of Streptozocin Diabetes and Diabetes Treatment by Islet Transplantation on In Vivo Insulin Signaling in Rat Heart

The insulin signaling cascade was investigated in rat myocardium in vivo in the presence of streptozocin (STZ)-induced diabetes and after diabetes treatment by islet transplantation under the kidney capsule. The levels of insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor β-subunit, insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-2, and p52Shc were increased in diabetic compared with control heart, whereas tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 was unchanged. The amount of the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) and the level of PI 3-kinase activity associated with IRS-2 were also elevated in diabetes, whereas no changes in IRS-1–associated PI 3-kinase were observed. Insulin-induced phosphorylation of Akt on Thr-308 was increased fivefold in diabetic heart, whereas Akt phosphorylation on Ser-473 was normal. In contrast with Akt phosphorylation, insulin-induced phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3, a major cellular substrate of Akt, was markedly reduced in diabetes. In islet-transplanted rats, the majority of the alterations in insulin-signaling proteins found in diabetic rats were normalized, but insulin stimulation of IRS-2 tyrosine phosphorylation and association with PI 3-kinase was blunted. In conclusion, in the diabetic heart, 1) IRS-1, IRS-2, and p52Shc are differently altered, 2) the levels of Akt phosphorylation on Ser-473 and Thr-308, respectively, are not coordinately regulated, and 3) the increased activity of proximal-signaling proteins (i.e., IRS-2 and PI 3-kinase) is not propagated distally to GSK-3. Islet transplantation under the kidney capsule is a potentially effective therapy to correct several diabetes-induced abnormalities of insulin signaling in cardiac muscle but does not restore the responsiveness of all signaling reactions to insulin

Gut: A key player in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes?

The gut regulates glucose and energy homeostasis; thus, the presence of ingested nutrients into the gut activates sensing mechanisms that affect both glucose homeostasis and regulate food intake. Increasing evidence suggest that gut may also play a key role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes which may be related to both the intestinal microbiological profile and patterns of gut hormones secretion. Intestinal microbiota includes trillions of microorganisms but its composition and function may be adversely affected in type 2 diabetes. The intestinal microbiota may be responsible of the secretion of molecules that may impair insulin secretion/action. At the same time, intestinal milieu regulates the secretion of hormones such as GLP-1, GIP, ghrelin, gastrin, somatostatin, CCK, serotonin, peptide YY, GLP-2, all of which importantly influence metabolism in general and in particular glucose metabolism. Thus, the aim of this paper is to review the current evidence on the role of the gut in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, taking into account both hormonal and microbiological aspects

Gestione iniziale della terapia con insulina basale nel paziente diabetico

n/

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET)

Several protocols are actually available for in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. The review summarizes the main differences and the clinic characteristics of the protocols in use with GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists by emphasizing the major outcomes and hormonal changes associated with each protocol. The majority of randomized clinical trials clearly shows that in "in Vitro" Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, the combination of exogenous Gonadotropin plus a Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist, which is able to suppress pituitary FSH and LH secretion, is associated with increased pregnancy rate as compared with the use of gonadotropins without a GnRH agonist. Protocols with GnRH antagonists are effective in preventing a premature rise of LH and induce a shorter and more cost-effective ovarian stimulation compared to the long agonist protocol. However, a different synchronization of follicular recruitment and growth occurs with GnRH agonists than with GnRH antagonists. Future developments have to be focused on timing of the administration of GnRH antagonists, by giving a great attention to new strategies of stimulation in patients in which radio-chemotherapy cycles are needed