29 research outputs found
Filling Carbon Nanotubes with Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> Nanowires through in Situ Catalyst Transition and Extrusion
We describe the synthesis of novel Co9S8-nanowire-filled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) by a simple method
involving the pyrolysis of thiophene on cobalt catalyst in a conventional chemical vapor decomposition system.
The encapsulated Co9S8 nanowires are single-crystalline, and their lengths are about 10 μm with their [110]
direction parallel to the axis of the CNTs. Detailed investigation suggests that the filling of the Co9S8 nanowires
results from the volume increase induced by a phase transition from cobalt to cobalt sulfide together with the
in situ extruding action of CNTs as nanomolds. A new filling mechanism is thus found and proposed
<i>In Situ</i> Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Conversion Mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/Graphene Anode during Lithiation–Delithiation Processes
Transition metal oxides have attracted tremendous attention as anode materials for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recently. However, their electrochemical processes and fundamental mechanisms remain unclear. Here we report the direct observation of the dynamic behaviors and the conversion mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene in LIBs by <i>in situ</i> transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Upon lithiation, the Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles showed obvious volume expansion and morphological changes, and the surfaces of the electrode were covered by a nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. Single-crystalline Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles were found to transform to multicrystalline nanoparticles consisting of many Fe nanograins embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. Surprisingly, the delithiated product was not Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> but FeO, accounting for the irreversible electrochemical process and the large capacity fading of the anode material in the first cycle. The charge–discharge processes of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in LIBs are different from previously recognized mechanism, and are found to be a fully reversible electrochemical phase conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins accompanying the formation and disappearance of the Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. The macroscopic electrochemical performance of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene was further correlated with the microcosmic <i>in situ</i> TEM results
<i>In Situ</i> Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Conversion Mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/Graphene Anode during Lithiation–Delithiation Processes
Transition metal oxides have attracted tremendous attention as anode materials for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recently. However, their electrochemical processes and fundamental mechanisms remain unclear. Here we report the direct observation of the dynamic behaviors and the conversion mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene in LIBs by <i>in situ</i> transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Upon lithiation, the Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles showed obvious volume expansion and morphological changes, and the surfaces of the electrode were covered by a nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. Single-crystalline Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles were found to transform to multicrystalline nanoparticles consisting of many Fe nanograins embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. Surprisingly, the delithiated product was not Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> but FeO, accounting for the irreversible electrochemical process and the large capacity fading of the anode material in the first cycle. The charge–discharge processes of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in LIBs are different from previously recognized mechanism, and are found to be a fully reversible electrochemical phase conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins accompanying the formation and disappearance of the Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. The macroscopic electrochemical performance of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene was further correlated with the microcosmic <i>in situ</i> TEM results
<i>In Situ</i> Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Conversion Mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/Graphene Anode during Lithiation–Delithiation Processes
Transition metal oxides have attracted tremendous attention as anode materials for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recently. However, their electrochemical processes and fundamental mechanisms remain unclear. Here we report the direct observation of the dynamic behaviors and the conversion mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene in LIBs by <i>in situ</i> transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Upon lithiation, the Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles showed obvious volume expansion and morphological changes, and the surfaces of the electrode were covered by a nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. Single-crystalline Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles were found to transform to multicrystalline nanoparticles consisting of many Fe nanograins embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. Surprisingly, the delithiated product was not Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> but FeO, accounting for the irreversible electrochemical process and the large capacity fading of the anode material in the first cycle. The charge–discharge processes of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in LIBs are different from previously recognized mechanism, and are found to be a fully reversible electrochemical phase conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins accompanying the formation and disappearance of the Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. The macroscopic electrochemical performance of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene was further correlated with the microcosmic <i>in situ</i> TEM results
<i>In Situ</i> Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Conversion Mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/Graphene Anode during Lithiation–Delithiation Processes
Transition metal oxides have attracted tremendous attention as anode materials for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recently. However, their electrochemical processes and fundamental mechanisms remain unclear. Here we report the direct observation of the dynamic behaviors and the conversion mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene in LIBs by <i>in situ</i> transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Upon lithiation, the Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles showed obvious volume expansion and morphological changes, and the surfaces of the electrode were covered by a nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. Single-crystalline Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles were found to transform to multicrystalline nanoparticles consisting of many Fe nanograins embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. Surprisingly, the delithiated product was not Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> but FeO, accounting for the irreversible electrochemical process and the large capacity fading of the anode material in the first cycle. The charge–discharge processes of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in LIBs are different from previously recognized mechanism, and are found to be a fully reversible electrochemical phase conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins accompanying the formation and disappearance of the Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. The macroscopic electrochemical performance of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene was further correlated with the microcosmic <i>in situ</i> TEM results
In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Lithiation–Delithiation Conversion Behavior of CuO/Graphene Anode
The electrochemical conversion behavior
of metal oxides as well
as its influence on the lithium-storage performance remains unclear.
In this paper, we studied the dynamic electrochemical conversion process
of CuO/graphene as anode by in situ transmission electron microscopy.
The microscopic conversion behavior of the electrode was further correlated
with its macroscopic lithium-storage properties. During the first
lithiation, the porous CuO nanoparticles transformed to numerous Cu
nanograins (2–3 nm) embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. The
porous spaces were found to be favorable for accommodating the volume
expansion during lithium insertion. Two types of irreversible processes
were revealed during the lithiation–delithiation cycles. First,
the nature of the charge–discharge process of CuO anode is
a reversible phase conversion between Cu<sub>2</sub>O and Cu nanograins.
The delithiation reaction cannot recover the electrode to its pristine
structure (CuO), which is responsible for about ∼55% of the
capacity fading in the first cycle. Second, there is a severe nanograin
aggregation during the initial conversion cycles, which leads to low
Coulombic efficiency. This finding could also account for the electrochemical
behaviors of other transition metal oxide anodes that operate with
similar electrochemical conversion mechanism
In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of Electrochemical Behavior of CoS<sub>2</sub> in Lithium-Ion Battery
Metal sulfides are a type of potential anode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, their electrochemical behaviors and mechanism during the charge and discharge process remain unclear. In the present paper, we use CoS<sub>2</sub> as a model material to investigate their electrochemical process using in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Two kinds of reaction behaviors are revealed. The pure CoS<sub>2</sub> particles show a side-to-side conversion process, in which large and anisotropic size expansion (47.1%) occurs that results in the formation of cracks and fractures in CoS<sub>2</sub> particles. In contrast, the CoS<sub>2</sub> particles anchored on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets exhibit a core–shell conversion process involving small and homogeneous size expansion (28.6%) and few fractures, which attributes to the excellent Li<sup>+</sup> conductivity of rGO sheets and accounts for the improved cyclability. Single-crystalline CoS<sub>2</sub> particle converts to Co nanocrystals of 1–2 nm embedded within Li<sub>2</sub>S matrix after the first lithiation. The subsequent electrochemical reaction is a reversible phase conversion between Co/Li<sub>2</sub>S and CoS<sub>2</sub> nanocrystals. Our direct observations provide important mechanistic insight for developing high-performance conversion electrodes for LIBs
Synthesis of Porous NiO-Wrapped Graphene Nanosheets and Their Improved Lithium Storage Properties
This
article reports a facile preparation of NiO–graphene composite
by the combination of a solution-based method and subsequent annealing.
X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy reveals that the graphene
nanosheets are uniformly wrapped by porous NiO nanosheets in the product.
The composite shows highly improved electrochemical performance as
anode for Li–ion batteries (LIBs). The NiO–graphene
nanosheets deliver a first discharge capacity of 2169.6 mAh g–1 and remain a reversible capacity up to 704.8 mAh
g–1 after 50 cycles at a current of 200 mA g–1 in half cells. Contrarily, the pristine NiO nanosheets
show only a reversible capacity of 134 mA g–1 after
50 cycles. The NiO–graphene composite also exhibits ameliorative
rate capacity of 402.6 mAh g–1 at the current of
1600 mA g–1. In particular, these novel nanostructured
composites show exceptional capacity retention in the assembled NiO–graphene/LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 full cell
at different current density. The enhanced electrochemical performances
are ascribed to the stable sheet-on-sheet architectures and the synergistic
effects between the conductive graphene and thin porous NiO nanosheets
Ultrathin SnO<sub>2</sub> Nanosheets: Oriented Attachment Mechanism, Nonstoichiometric Defects, and Enhanced Lithium-Ion Battery Performances
We successfully synthesized large-scale and highly pure
ultrathin
SnO<sub>2</sub> nanosheets (NSs), with a minimum thickness in the
regime of ca. 2.1 nm as determined by HRTEM and in good agreement
with XRD refinements and AFM height profiles. Through TEM and HRTEM
observations on time-dependent samples, we found that the as-prepared
SnO<sub>2</sub> NSs were assembled by “oriented attachment”
of preformed SnO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles (NPs). Systematic trials
showed that well-defined ultrathin SnO<sub>2</sub> NSs could only
be obtained under appropriate reaction time, solvent, additive, precursor
concentration, and cooling rate. A certain degree of nonstoichiometry
appears inevitable in the well-defined SnO<sub>2</sub> NSs sample.
However, deviations from the optimal synthetic parameters give rise
to severe nonstoichiometry in the products, resulting in the formation
of Sn<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> or SnO. This finding may open new accesses
to the fundamental investigations of tin oxides as well as their intertransition
processes. Finally, we investigated the lithium-ion storage of the
SnO<sub>2</sub> NSs as compared to SnO<sub>2</sub> hollow spheres
and NPs. The results showed superior performance of SnO<sub>2</sub> NSs sample over its two counterparts. This greatly enhanced Li-ion
storage capability of SnO<sub>2</sub> NSs is probably resulting from
the ultrathin thicknesses and the unique porous structures: the nanometer-sized
networks provide negligible diffusion times of ions thus faster phase
transitions, while the “breathable” interior porous
structure can effectively buffer the drastic volume changes during
lithiation and delithiation reactions
Lithiation Behavior of Individual Carbon-Coated Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Nanowire Observed by in Situ TEM
Fe3O4 nanowires, as a typical transition-metal
oxide (TMO), are being considered as promising anodes for lithium
ion batteries (LIBs) due to their 1D structure and high specific capacity.
However, their underlying mechanism and electrochemical behaviors
are still poorly understood. Here, the dynamic behavior and the electrochemical
reaction of the carbon-coated Fe3O4 (Fe3O4@C) nanowire have been investigated directly
through assembling a nanoscale LIBs inside transmission electron microscope
(TEM). The in situ TEM results reveal that the Fe3O4 nanowires undergo cracking and fracturing upon the first
lithiation, but the carbon coatings still embrace the oxide cores
well after lithiation and play a role in maintaining the mechanical
and electrical integrity. Meanwhile the lithiation process involves
the conversion of Fe3O4 nanowires to Fe nanograins
and the formation of Li2O along the lithium ions diffusion
direction. The delithiated product is FeO rather than the original
phase of Fe3O4 after the first delithiation
process. This irreversible phase conversion may be a major cause of
capacity fading of the electrode in the first cycle. As for the Fe3O4 electrode, about 78% of the capacity loss can
be attributed to the irreversible phase reaction in the first cycle.
During the subsequent lithiation-delithiation cycles, the Fe3O4 electrode shows a reversible conversion between Fe
and FeO nanograins, accounting for the good reversibility of Fe3O4 anodes for LIBs. Our in situ results provide
important insights into the electrochemical behavior and conversion
mechanism of TMO-based anodes in LIBs and are helpful for designing
LIBs with outstanding performance
