DataSheet_1_Factors associated with cancer survival disparities among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples compared with other Australians: A systematic review.pdf

BackgroundWhile cancer survival among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples has improved over time, they continue to experience poorer cancer survival than other Australians. Key drivers of these disparities are not well understood. This systematic review aimed to summarise existing evidence on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer survival disparities and identify influential factors and potential solutions.MethodsIn accordance with PRISMA guidelines, multiple databases were systematically searched for English language peer-reviewed articles on cancer survival by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status published from 1/1/2008 to 4/05/2022. Observational studies presenting adjusted survival measures in relation to potential causal factors for disparities were included. Articles were screened independently by two authors. Included studies were critically assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools.ResultsThirty population-based and predominantly state-level studies were included. A consistent pattern of poorer unadjusted cancer survival for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples was evident. Studies varied widely in the covariates adjusted for including a combination of socio-demographics, cancer stage, comorbidities, and treatment. Potential contributions of these factors varied by cancer type. For lung and female breast cancer, adjusting for treatment and comorbidities reduced the survival disparity, which, while still elevated was no longer statistically significant. This pattern was also evident for cervical cancer after adjustment for stage and treatment. However, most studies for all cancers combined, or colorectal cancer, reported that unexplained survival disparities remained after adjusting for various combinations of covariates.ConclusionsWhile some of the poorer survival faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer patients can be explained, substantial disparities likely to be related to Aboriginal determinants, remain. It is imperative that future research consider innovative study designs and strength-based approaches to better understand cancer survival for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and to inform evidence-based action.</p

Interview guide.

(DOCX)</p

Key themes underlying under-screened women’s views of cervical screening.

Key themes underlying under-screened women’s views of cervical screening.</p

Comorbidity and cervical cancer survival of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian women: A semi-national registry-based cohort study (2003-2012)

<div><p>Background</p><p>Little is known about the impact of comorbidity on cervical cancer survival in Australian women, including whether Indigenous women’s higher prevalence of comorbidity contributes to their lower survival compared to non-Indigenous women.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Data for cervical cancers diagnosed in 2003–2012 were extracted from six Australian state-based cancer registries and linked to hospital inpatient records to identify comorbidity diagnoses. Five-year cause-specific and all-cause survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Flexible parametric models were used to estimate excess cause-specific mortality by Charlson comorbidity index score (0,1,2+), for Indigenous women compared to non-Indigenous women.</p><p>Results</p><p>Of 4,467 women, Indigenous women (4.4%) compared to non-Indigenous women had more comorbidity at diagnosis (score ≥1: 24.2% vs. 10.0%) and lower five-year cause-specific survival (60.2% vs. 76.6%). Comorbidity was associated with increased cervical cancer mortality for non-Indigenous women, but there was no evidence of such a relationship for Indigenous women. There was an 18% reduction in the Indigenous: non-Indigenous hazard ratio (excess mortality) when comorbidity was included in the model, yet this reduction was not statistically significant. The excess mortality for Indigenous women was only evident among those without comorbidity (Indigenous: non-Indigenous HR 2.5, 95%CI 1.9–3.4), indicating that factors other than those measured in this study are contributing to the differential. In a subgroup of New South Wales women, comorbidity was associated with advanced-stage cancer, which in turn was associated with elevated cervical cancer mortality.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Survival was lowest for women with comorbidity. However, there wasn’t a clear comorbidity-survival gradient for Indigenous women. Further investigation of potential drivers of the cervical cancer survival differentials is warranted.</p><p>Impact</p><p>The results highlight the need for cancer care guidelines and multidisciplinary care that can meet the needs of complex patients. Also, primary and acute care services may need to pay more attention to Indigenous Australian women who may not obviously need it (i.e. those without comorbidity).</p></div

Demographic characteristics of Indigenous and non-Indigenous women’s Pap smears by abnormality, 2000–2011.

<p>Demographic characteristics of Indigenous and non-Indigenous women’s Pap smears by abnormality, 2000–2011.</p

Crude five-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for 4,467 Australian women (22–89 years)^a diagnosed with cervical cancer, 2003–2012, stratified by Charlson comorbidity score (0,1,2+).

<p>Crude five-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for 4,467 Australian women (22–89 years)^a diagnosed with cervical cancer, 2003–2012, stratified by Charlson comorbidity score (0,1,2+).</p

Cause-specific survival for NSW women (n = 1,069) by Charlson Comorbidity Index score, stratified by cancer stage, adjusted for age at diagnosis and Indigenous status.

<p>Cause-specific survival for NSW women (n = 1,069) by Charlson Comorbidity Index score, stratified by cancer stage, adjusted for age at diagnosis and Indigenous status.</p

Adjusted hazard ratios for five-year cause-specific mortality for Australian women, 22–89 years, diagnosed with cervical cancer, 2003–2012 ^{a, b}.

<p>Adjusted hazard ratios for five-year cause-specific mortality for Australian women, 22–89 years, diagnosed with cervical cancer, 2003–2012 ^{a, b}.</p

Demographic and clinical characteristics of 4,467 Australian women diagnosed with cervical cancer 2003–2012, by Indigenous status.

<p>Demographic and clinical characteristics of 4,467 Australian women diagnosed with cervical cancer 2003–2012, by Indigenous status.</p

Cause-specific mortality rates for Indigenous and non-Indigenous women stratified by Charlson Comorbidity Index score, adjusted for age at diagnosis, area-level socioeconomic status, and histology type.

<p>Cause-specific mortality rates for Indigenous and non-Indigenous women stratified by Charlson Comorbidity Index score, adjusted for age at diagnosis, area-level socioeconomic status, and histology type.</p