2 research outputs found
Identifying Serum Small Extracellular Vesicle MicroRNA as a Noninvasive Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer
There remains a lack of effective and noninvasive methods
for the
diagnosis and prognosis prediction of epithelial ovarian carcinoma
(EOC). Here, we investigated the possibility of serum-derived small
extracellular vesicle (sEV) microRNAs (miRNAs) as potential biomarkers
for distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses and
predicting the prognosis of EOC patients. A serum sEV miRNA model
for identifying the EOC (sEVmiR-EOC) was successfully established
in the training cohort. Furthermore, the sEVmiR-EOC model was confirmed
in the testing cohort and validation cohort, demonstrating robust
diagnostic accuracy. The sEVmiR-EOC model showed better performance
than carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) in discriminating patients with
stage I EOC from benign patients. Using EOC samples and follow-up
data, we identified miR-141-3p and miR-200c-3p as potential prognostic
predictors. Finally, we confirmed the change of the sEVmiR-EOC RiskScore
between the preoperative and postoperative samples and found that
the sEVmiR-EOC model could predict the prognosis of EOC patients
DataSheet_1_Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Score Analysis for Predicting the Expression of the Immunotherapy Biomarker PD-L1 in Lung Cancer.docx
Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a critical biomarker for predicting the response to immunotherapy. However, traditional quantitative evaluation of PD-L1 expression using immunohistochemistry staining remains challenging for pathologists. Here we developed a deep learning (DL)-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to automatically analyze the immunohistochemical expression of PD-L1 in lung cancer patients. A total of 1,288 patients with lung cancer were included in the study. The diagnostic ability of three different AI models (M1, M2, and M3) was assessed in both PD-L1 (22C3) and PD-L1 (SP263) assays. M2 and M3 showed improved performance in the evaluation of PD-L1 expression in the PD-L1 (22C3) assay, especially at 1% cutoff. Highly accurate performance in the PD-L1 (SP263) was also achieved, with accuracy and specificity of 96.4 and 96.8% in both M2 and M3, respectively. Moreover, the diagnostic results of these three AI-assisted models were highly consistent with those from the pathologist. Similar performances of M1, M2, and M3 in the 22C3 dataset were also obtained in lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma in both sampling methods. In conclusion, these results suggest that AI-assisted diagnostic models in PD-L1 expression are a promising tool for improving the efficiency of clinical pathologists.</p