7 research outputs found
Facile Strategy for Preparing a Rosin-Based Low‑<i>k</i> Material: Molecular Design of Free Volume
Low-k dielectrics are urgently needed in modern
integrated circuits. The introduction of free volume instead of porous
structures has become a powerful strategy to reduce the k value. According to this strategy, the biomass resource rosin-containing
hydrogenated phenanthrene ring was introduced into benzocyclobutene
(BCB) resin to reduce the k value; then a rosin-based
BCB monomer was successfully synthesized. Meanwhile, the BCB monomer
without a rosin skeleton was prepared. After converting the monomers
into thermo-crosslinked materials, notably that the rosin skeleton
has a great influence on the free volume and k value
of the material. The fractional free volume and k value of the former are 26% and 2.44, respectively, and those of
the latter are 14% and 2.84, respectively. In addition, the distances
between molecular chains and the density of the former are 0.60 nm
and 1.06 g cm–3, respectively; those of the latter
are 0.56 nm and 1.28 g cm–3, respectively. These
data show that introducing hydrogenated phenanthrene rings occupies
part of the space and hinders the packing of molecular chains, which
increases the distance between molecular chains and reduces the density
of the polymer, resulting in an increasing free volume and a reducing k value. Notably that introducing hydrogenated phenanthrene
rings cannot affect other properties of the material. Therefore, this
research indicates that introducing rosin skeletons can prepare high-performance
materials, which provide some promising low-k materials
for the development of electronics and microelectronics
Rigidity versus Flexibility of Ligands in the Assembly of Entangled Coordination Polymers Based on Bi- and Tetra Carboxylates and N‑Donor Ligands
Seven Zn(II) coordination polymers
including [Zn(pbda)(<i>p</i>-bimb)]·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>1</b>), [Zn(pbda)(bpa)<sub>0.5</sub>] (<b>2</b>), [Zn(pbda)(bpp)] (<b>3</b>), [Zn(Hpbda)<sub>2</sub>(bibm)<sub>2</sub>] (<b>4</b>), [Zn(pbta)<sub>0.5</sub>(m-bimb)]·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>5</b>), [Zn(pbta)<sub>0.5</sub>(bpp)(H<sub>2</sub>O)] (<b>6</b>), and [Zn(H<sub>2</sub>pbta)(bibm)]·H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>7</b>) (H<sub>2</sub>pbda = 4,4′-{[1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(oxy)}dibenzoic
acid; p-bimb = 1,4-bis(1<i>H</i>-imidazol-l-yl)methyl)benzene;
bpa = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane; bpp = 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)-propane;
bibm = 4,4′-di(1<i>H</i>-imidazol-1-yl)-1,1′-biphenyl;
m-bimb = 1,3-bis(1<i>H</i>-imidazol-l-yl)methyl)-benzene;
H<sub>4</sub>pbta = 5,5′-phenylenebis(methylene)-1,1′-3,3′-(benzene-tetracarboxylic
acid) were prepared under solvothermal conditions and structurally
characterized. Compound <b>1</b> shows a three-dimensional (3D)
channel-like architecture constructed by helical chain subunits. Compound <b>2</b> shows a rare 2D + 2D + 2D → 2D network with both
polyrotaxane and polycatenane features. <b>3</b> holds a 2D
layer structure constituted of metal-sharing right- and left-handed
helical chains. Compound <b>4</b> presents a one-dimensional
(1D) chain which is decorated by long side arms around the chain.
Compound <b>5</b> possesses a 2D wave-like layer formed by [Zn<sub>2</sub>(<i>m</i>-bimb)]<sub><i>n</i></sub> chains
by linear pbta ligands. Compound <b>6</b> displays a 3D framework
that is stabilized by hydrogen bonding interactions between the coordinated
H<sub>2</sub>O molecules and the neighboring carboxylate oxygen atoms.
Compound <b>7</b> possesses a 1D + 1D → 2D polycatenation
motif. The results demonstrated that the rigidity versus flexibility
of the ligands along with the number of carboxyl groups make an impact
on the structural diversities of the entangled coordination polymers.
Moreover, compounds <b>3</b> and <b>6</b> as representative
examples possessed high catalytic efficiency for the photodecomposition
of methyl blue in water using natural sunlight irradiation
Construction of Entangled Coordination Polymers Based on M<sup>2+</sup> Ions, 4,4′-{[1,2-Phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(oxy)}dibenzoate and Different N‑Donor Ligands
Reactions
of several transition metal [M = Mn(II), Cu(II), Zn(II),
Co(II)] salts with 4,4′-{[1,2-phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(oxy)}dibenzoic
acid (H<sub>2</sub>L) and auxiliary N-donor ligands afforded a series
of entangled coordination frameworks, [Mn<sub>2</sub>L<sub>2</sub>(4,4′-bpy)<sub>2</sub>][Mn<sub>2</sub>L<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·2H<sub>2</sub>O <b>(1)</b>, [CuL(bbm)]·0.5H<sub>2</sub>O <b>(2)</b>, [CuL(4,4′-bpy)<sub>0.5</sub>] <b>(3)</b>, [Zn<sub>3</sub>L<sub>2</sub>(4,4′-bpy)<sub>2</sub>(HCOO)<sub>2</sub>] <b>(4)</b>, [ZnL(4,4′-bpy)]<sub>2</sub>·H<sub>2</sub>O <b>(5)</b>, [Co<sub>4</sub>L<sub>4</sub>(bpp)<sub>2</sub>]·DMF <b>(6)</b>, [Co<sub>2</sub>L<sub>2</sub>(bbm)]<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O <b>(7)</b>, and [CoL(2,2′-bpy)] <b>(8)</b> [2,2′-bpy =
2,2′-bipyridine; 4,4′-bpy = 4,4′-bipyridine;
bbm =1,4-di(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzene; bpp = 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane].
Their structures were characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectra,
and TG analysis and further determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis. Compound <b>1</b> has an uncommon 2D<sub>layer</sub> + 1D<sub>chain</sub> → 3D framework, while <b>2</b> displays a 2-fold interpenetrated 3D framework. Compounds <b>3</b>–<b>5</b> show different entangled networks
though they adopt the same 4,4′-bpy as the auxiliary ligand.
Compounds <b>3</b> and <b>5</b> show 2-fold interpenetrated
2D networks, showing both polycatenane and polyrotaxane characters.
Compound <b>4</b> possesses a 2D → 3D polythreaded architecture.
Compound <b>6</b> has a 3-fold interpenetrated 3D framework
by using bpp as the second ligand. Compound <b>7</b> presents
a 3D framework with a (4<sup>4</sup>·6<sup>2</sup>·8<sup>8</sup>·12)(4<sup>4</sup>·6<sup>2</sup>)(8) topology. Compound <b>8</b> presents a 1D helical chain constructed by linking [Co(2,2′-bpy)]<sup>2+</sup> units via L ligands. The results provided an interesting
insight into how metal ions, auxiliary N-donor ligands, and molar
ratios of the components exert great impact on the formation of these
entangled networks. The thermal and luminescent properties of <b>1</b>–<b>8</b> in solid state at ambient temperature
were also investigated
Coordination Polymer-Mediated Molecular Surgery for Precise Interconversion of Dicyclobutane Compounds
A Cd(II)-based coordination polymer {[Cd2(5-F-1,3-bpeb)2(FBA)4]·H2O}n (CP1) was obtained from
Cd(II) salt, 5-fluoro-1,3-bis[2-(4-pyridyl)ethenyl]benzene (5-F-1,3-bpeb),
and p-fluorobenzoic acid (HFBA). Within the one-dimensional
chain structure of CP1, a pair
of 5-F-1,3-bpeb was arranged in a face-to-face style. Upon UV irradiation
and heat treatment, multiple cyclobutane isomers, including specific
monocyclobutanes (1 with an endo-cyclobutane
ring in CP1-1 and 1′ with an exo-cyclobutane ring in CP1-1′) and dicyclobutanes
(endo,endo-dicyclobutane 2α in CP1-2α, exo,endo-dicyclobutane 2β in CP1-2β, and exo,exo-dicyclobutane 2γ in CP1-2γ) were stereoselectively produced. These isomers
could be interconverted inside the CP via cutting/coupling
specific bonds, which may be regarded as a type of molecular surgery.
The precision of cutting/coupling relied on the thermal stability
of the cyclobutanes and the alignment of the reactive alkene centers.
The conversion processes were tracked through nuclear magnetic resonance,
in situ powder X-ray diffraction, and IR spectroscopy. This approach
can be considered as skeletal editing to construct complex organic
compounds directly from one precursor
Five new cobalt(II) complexes based on indazole derivatives: synthesis, DNA binding and molecular docking study
Five cobalt(II) complexes based on 1H-indazole-3-carboxylic acid (H2L), [Co(phen)(HL)2]·2H2O (1), [Co(5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipy)(HL)2] (2), [Co(2,2′-bipy)2(HL)2]·5H2O (3), [Co2(2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phen)2(L)2] (4) and [Co2(6,6′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipy)2(L)2]·H2O (5) (2,2'-bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline), have been synthesized and structurally characterized by elemental analyses, IR and UV-vis spectroscopies and single-crystal X-ray crystallography. The results indicate that 1–3 possess mononuclear Co(II) structures, while 4 and 5 exhibit binuclear structure. 1D water tape which is linked by the multiple hydrogen bonds was embedded in the 3D motif of complex 3. Complexes 4 and 5 show two orthogonal planes of motif that was constituted by phen/2,2′-bipy and indazole acid, respectively. The intermolecular interactions including hydrogen bonding and π-π stacking interactions are stabilizing these complexes. The interactions of the synthesized complexes with calf-thymus DNA (CT-DNA) have been investigated by UV-vis absorption titration, ethidium bromide displacement assay and viscosity measurements. The results reveal that the complexes could interact with CT-DNA via a groove binding mode. Their behavior rationalization was further theoretically studied by molecular docking.</p
Construction of Entangled Coordination Polymers Based on M<sup>2+</sup> Ions, 4,4′-{[1,2-Phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(oxy)}dibenzoate and Different N‑Donor Ligands
Reactions
of several transition metal [M = Mn(II), Cu(II), Zn(II),
Co(II)] salts with 4,4′-{[1,2-phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(oxy)}dibenzoic
acid (H<sub>2</sub>L) and auxiliary N-donor ligands afforded a series
of entangled coordination frameworks, [Mn<sub>2</sub>L<sub>2</sub>(4,4′-bpy)<sub>2</sub>][Mn<sub>2</sub>L<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·2H<sub>2</sub>O <b>(1)</b>, [CuL(bbm)]·0.5H<sub>2</sub>O <b>(2)</b>, [CuL(4,4′-bpy)<sub>0.5</sub>] <b>(3)</b>, [Zn<sub>3</sub>L<sub>2</sub>(4,4′-bpy)<sub>2</sub>(HCOO)<sub>2</sub>] <b>(4)</b>, [ZnL(4,4′-bpy)]<sub>2</sub>·H<sub>2</sub>O <b>(5)</b>, [Co<sub>4</sub>L<sub>4</sub>(bpp)<sub>2</sub>]·DMF <b>(6)</b>, [Co<sub>2</sub>L<sub>2</sub>(bbm)]<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O <b>(7)</b>, and [CoL(2,2′-bpy)] <b>(8)</b> [2,2′-bpy =
2,2′-bipyridine; 4,4′-bpy = 4,4′-bipyridine;
bbm =1,4-di(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzene; bpp = 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane].
Their structures were characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectra,
and TG analysis and further determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis. Compound <b>1</b> has an uncommon 2D<sub>layer</sub> + 1D<sub>chain</sub> → 3D framework, while <b>2</b> displays a 2-fold interpenetrated 3D framework. Compounds <b>3</b>–<b>5</b> show different entangled networks
though they adopt the same 4,4′-bpy as the auxiliary ligand.
Compounds <b>3</b> and <b>5</b> show 2-fold interpenetrated
2D networks, showing both polycatenane and polyrotaxane characters.
Compound <b>4</b> possesses a 2D → 3D polythreaded architecture.
Compound <b>6</b> has a 3-fold interpenetrated 3D framework
by using bpp as the second ligand. Compound <b>7</b> presents
a 3D framework with a (4<sup>4</sup>·6<sup>2</sup>·8<sup>8</sup>·12)(4<sup>4</sup>·6<sup>2</sup>)(8) topology. Compound <b>8</b> presents a 1D helical chain constructed by linking [Co(2,2′-bpy)]<sup>2+</sup> units via L ligands. The results provided an interesting
insight into how metal ions, auxiliary N-donor ligands, and molar
ratios of the components exert great impact on the formation of these
entangled networks. The thermal and luminescent properties of <b>1</b>–<b>8</b> in solid state at ambient temperature
were also investigated
