27 research outputs found

    Language effect for each task, and the conjunction between the two tasks.

    No full text
    <p>Brain activation for English greater than Chinese is in red and Chinese greater than English is in blue.</p

    Overlap between the language effect and task effect for all characters, characters learned in the character-writing condition and characters learned in the pinyin-writing condition for English L1 participants.

    No full text
    <p>Overlap between the language effect and task effect for all characters, characters learned in the character-writing condition and characters learned in the pinyin-writing condition for English L1 participants.</p

    Brain regions that are activated in the comparison between reading and writing for English, Chinese and both in English L1 participants.

    No full text
    <p>Brain regions that are activated in the comparison between reading and writing for English, Chinese and both in English L1 participants.</p

    Task effect in each language, and the conjunction between the two languages.

    No full text
    <p>Brain activation for reading greater than writing is in red and writing greater than reading is in blue.</p

    Overlap between Chinese greater than English and writing greater than reading.

    No full text
    <p>The results are presented for all Chinese characters, Chinese characters learned in the character-writing condition and characters learned in the pinyin-writing condition for the English L1 participants. Bar graph shows the brain activation at the left middle frontal gyrus at (-50, 2, 28) in each task for characters learned in either character-writing or pinyin-writing and for English words. *** indicates significance at p < .001. Error bars indicate standard errors.</p

    Overlap between reading and writing for each language in English L1 participants.

    No full text
    <p>Overlap between reading and writing for each language in English L1 participants.</p

    ROI analysis at the bilateral superior temporal gyri in the Chinese L1 group.

    No full text
    <p>The center is at (-58, -66, 16) for the left STG and at (62, -56, 12) for the right STG. Chinese L1 participants showed greater activation for English than for Chinese at these two regions. * indicates significance at p < .1. Error bars indicate standard errors.</p

    Brain activation for each task in each language.

    No full text
    <p>Chinese reading, English reading, Chinese writing, English writing, and the overlap between reading and writing in Chinese and English in the English L1 participants.</p

    ROI analysis at the left middle frontal gyrus in the Chinese L1 group.

    No full text
    <p>Chinese L1 participants also showed greater activation for Chinese than for English at this ROI centered at (-50, 2, 28). * indicates significance at p < .05. Error bars indicate standard errors.</p

    Identification of aging fingerprint of base asphalt by ATR-FTIR combined with chemometrics

    No full text
    In this work, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) combined with chemometric analysis was used to classify and characterise aged asphalt. The full spectra of asphalt samples with 5 types at 6 aging states (30 samples) were determined using ATR-FTIR and the data matrix of the full spectra was analysed chemometrically. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) outcomes demonstrate that the asphalts of five oil sources are divided into three major categories. The samples of asphalt prior to and following aging with comparable oil sources are still grouped into one category. With up to 100% accuracy, one can discriminate between the asphalt samples from these three oil sources using Fisher's discriminant function based on PCA and HCA cluster analysis.This indicates that the aging characteristics of asphalt depend on the oil source, and the "genetic framework" of asphalt will not change with aging.</p
    corecore