22 research outputs found

    Real-world data on Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)-directed therapy in patients with peritoneal metastases; Third annual report from the ISSPP PIPAC database

    Get PDF
    In 2020, the International Society for the Study of the Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP) launched a database monitoring real-world data on Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)-directed therapy in patients with peritoneal metastases (PM). This study covers data from the third annual report on the ISSPP PIPAC database. Systematic analysis of all data reported to the ISSPP PIPAC database between June 15th, 2020, and November 1st, 2024. We hypothesize that ISSPP PIPAC data align with existing literature. Seventeen PIPAC centers reported 3224 PIPAC treatments in 1126 patients with PM (median number of treatments 2, range 1-33). The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) at PIPAC 1 was 19 and remained unchanged during subsequent treatments. The number of patients with &gt;500 mL ascites significantly decreased from the first three PIPAC treatments to PIPAC 4+ (p&lt;0.01). Major complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥3b) occurred in 0.7 % of the treatments, while Common. Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades ≥3 were reported in 5.2 %. Peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) was performed in 2306 (72 %) of the treatments. At PIPAC 1, 2, and 3, complete or major response (mean PRGS ≤2) was achieved in 57 %, 72 %, and 75 % of the patients, respectively. Median overall survival from PIPAC 1 was 12.5 months. Patients with complete/major response (mean PRGS ≤2) at PIPAC 1-3 had a longer overall survival compared to patients with minimal/no response (mean PRGS &gt;2). This study from the ISSPP PIPAC database provides substantial real-world data demonstrating the feasibility, safety, and potential effect of PIPAC-directed therapy in patients with PM.</p

    Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

    Factors Affecting Wound Healing after the Wide Surgical Excision of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Lesions

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and inflammatory disease. Its management depends on the stage and extent of the disease. Surgery plays an important role in treatment options. This study explores the factors influencing healing after wide excision. Methods: This study analyzed data from patients who underwent wide excision for HS between 2016 and 2021. Results: A total of 160 patients (64.4% women) were included, with surgeries performed in the axillae (70), inguinal-ano-genital (73), and other locations (17, including gluteal). The mean TTWC was 74 ± 6 days, varying from 11 to 445 days. Factors negatively influencing TTWC included axillary localization (p &lt; 0.001) and the presence of another inflammatory disease (p = 0.017). Factors positively influencing healing were smoking (&lt;0.001) and previous or ongoing medical treatment (antibiotherapy or biologics) (p = 0.011). Obesity or being overweight did not impact the TTWC in multivariate analysis, although overweight was significant in univariate analysis. Conclusions: While smoking cessation remains important in the management of HS, it does not appear to be a prerequisite for successful surgical treatment. Conversely, patients with an inflammatory disease or those undergoing surgery for an axillary lesion exhibit slower healing and should be informed of potential healing delays before surgery

    A severe oxaliplatin immune-induced syndrome after oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)

    No full text
    Abstract Objectives Oxaliplatin immune-induced syndrome (OIIS) was recently recognized as an uncommon complication of oxaliplatin therapy. Methods We report an exceptionally OIIS after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Results Our patient developed a severe OIIS probably related to the intraperitoneal administration of oxaliplatin. Specific tests were performed and detected high-titer antibodies to oxaliplatin. Conclusions The OIIS is a rare. Physicians had to be aware of that clinical situation because it could be reversible, even in case of peritoneal advanced disease, and ICU treatment is justified. </jats:sec
    corecore