MOESM11 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 11. All vinasse bin taxonomic affiliations based on CAT classification. Bin id’s highlighted in green indicate “good” bins; yellow id’s indicate “interesting” bins, and red indicate “bad” bins

MOESM12 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 12. All vinasse bin taxonomic affiliations based on CAT. Bin id’s highlighted in green indicate “good” bins; yellow id’s indicate “interesting” bins, and red indicate “bad” bins

MOESM2 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 2. Primers and thermocycler conditions used in gene abundance analysis by real time qPCR of the vinasse samples

MOESM6 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 6. Phylogenetic relationships between full-length 16S rRNA genes reconstructed from the vinasse metagenomes using REAGO. The 16S rRNA sequences from vinasse and reference sequences were aligned using ClustalW. The neighbor-joining tree was created with MEGA and visualized using iTol ignoring branch lengths

MOESM5 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 5. Taxonomic distribution of the merged vinasse metagenomes from MG-RAST annotation against RefSeq database. Phyla with average relative abundance greater than 1% across all samples were included. Samples with significantly different phyla between groups (Tukey–Kramer post hoc test, 95% confidence interval, p < 0.001) are indicated by different letters

MOESM7 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 7. Functional potential characterization of the vinasse samples from MG-RAST annotation against the Subsystems database. Only the subsystems at level 1 with average relative abundance greater than 2% across all samples were included. Significantly different subsystems at level 1 between sample groups (Tukey–Kramer post hoc test, 95% confidence interval, p < 0.05) are indicated by different letters

MOESM1 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 1. Data description of the 18 vinasse metagenomes

MOESM3 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 3. Hierarchical clustering of the vinasse metagenomes based on partial de Bruijn graph overlap from Metafast analysis. Replicates were most similar to each other

MOESM10 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 10. All vinasse bin characteristics and relative sample abundances (indicated by heatmap per sample). Bin id’s highlighted in green indicate “good” bins; yellow id’s indicate “interesting” bins, and red indicate “bad” bins

MOESM4 of Genome-resolved metagenomics of sugarcane vinasse bacteria

Additional file 4. Data description of the merged vinasse metagenomes uploaded to MG-RAST