26 research outputs found

    Skin-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Help Restore Function to Ovaries in a Premature Ovarian Failure Mouse Model

    No full text
    <div><p>Skin-derived mesenchymal stem cells (SMSCs) can differentiate into the three embryonic germ layers. For this reason, they are considered a powerful tool for therapeutic cloning and offer new possibilities for tissue therapy. Recent studies showed that skin-derived stem cells can differentiate into cells expressing germ-cell specific markers <i>in vitro</i> and form oocytes <i>in vivo</i>. The idea that SMSCs may be suitable for the treatment of intractable diseases or traumatic tissue damage has attracted attention. To determine the ability of SMSCs to reactivate injured ovaries, a mouse model with ovaries damaged by busulfan and cyclophosphamide was developed and is described here. Female skin-derived mesenchymal stem cells (F-SMSCs) and male skin-derived mesenchymal stem cells (M-SMSCs) from red fluorescence protein (RFP) transgenic adult mice were used to investigate the restorative effects of SMSCs on ovarian function. Significant increases in total body weight and the weight of reproductive organs were observed in the treated animals. Both F-SMSCs and M-SMSCs were shown to be capable of partially restoring fertility in chemotherapy-treated females. Immunostaining with RFP and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) antibodies demonstrated that the grafted SMSCs survived, migrated to the recipient ovaries. After SMSCs were administered to the treated mice, real-time PCR showed that the expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-8, IL-6, IL-1β, and IFNγ were significantly lower in the ovaries than in the untreated controls. Consistent with this observation, expression of oogenesis marker genes Nobox, Nanos3, and Lhx8 increased in ovaries of SMSCs-treated mice. These findings suggest that SMSCs may play a role within the ovarian follicle microenvironment in restoring the function of damaged ovaries and could be useful in reproductive health.</p></div

    Offspring produced by mating after SMSC transplantation into the mice sterilized by chemotherapy and those produced by untreated controls and normal controls.

    No full text
    <p>A) Litters of the different groups. B) Distribution of offspring in the treated and untreated groups. On average, significantly more pups were born to the mice that received chemotherapy plus F-SMSC- or M-SMSC-transplantation than to untreated controls (**, <i>P</i><0.01). However, the average number of pups produced by the normal control mice was still higher than the average number of pups from mice receiving F-SMSC- or M-SMSC-transplantation (**, <i>P</i><0.01).</p

    SMSC administration decreased ovary inflammation and improved folliculogenesis transcription.

    No full text
    <p>A) Analysis of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine gene expression as performed by qPCR. Administration of SMSCs 7 days after chemotherapy resulted in significantly less gene expression for TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-8, IL-6, IL-1β, and IFN-γ than in untreated control mice (*<i>P</i><0.05, **<i>P</i><0.01, ***<i>P</i><0.01). B) Expression of oocyte-specific genes in treated and untreated recipient mouse ovaries. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR showed that the relative expression of Nobox, Nanos3, and Lhx 8 was significantly higher in the SMSC group compared than among untreated controls (**<i>P</i><0.01). 18s rRNA served as an internal housekeeping gene. Data represent mean±SE of 3 independent experiments.</p

    Changes in total body weight and weight of reproductive organs in treated, untreated control, and normal control animals over 8 weeks.

    No full text
    <p>A) Representative photograph depicting the body type of 12 week-old mice in the (a) untreated control group, treated groups (b, F-SMSCs; c, M-SMSCs), and (d) normal control group. B) The total body weight of untreated mice decreased over the study period. However, mice in both the F-SMSC-treated and M-SMSC-treated groups weighed significantly more than mice in the untreated control group from the second week onward (**, <i>P</i><0.01). C) Representative photograph of ovaries removed from (a) the untreated control group, treated groups (b, F-SMSCs; c, M-SMSCs), and (d) normal control group. D) As indicated, the total weight of ovaries in the treated groups (both M-SMSC- and F-SMSC-treated) showed remarkable increases over the study period except before the first week (**, <i>P</i><0.01). E) The total weight of the uteruses in the treated group was significantly higher than that of untreated controls from the third week onward (*, <i>P</i><0.05; **, <i>P</i><0.01). F) There was no obvious change in the total weight of the cervixes and vaginas during the study period until after the 7th and 8th weeks (**, <i>P</i><0.01).</p

    The characterization and differentiation of mouse SMSCs.

    No full text
    <p>Morphology of A–B) F-SMSCs (a cell cluster in the middle of the dish) and C–D) M-SMSCs from RFP transgenic mice (scale bar, 200 µm). E) Phenotype of F-SMSCs by flow cytometry. Of the F-SMSCs, 96% expressed CD73 but not CD45, CD34, or CD14. F) M-SMSCs detected by flow cytometry. Of the M-SMSCs, 92% expressed CD73 but not CD45, CD34, or CD14. G) F-SMSCs and H) M-SMSCs were able to differentiate into adipocytes (oil red O staining), chondroblasts, and osteoblasts under standard in vitro differentiation conditions. The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue) (scale bar, 50 µm).</p

    Transplantation of a line of RFP-transgenic SMSCs into chemotherapy-sterilized recipient mice.

    No full text
    <p>A) Immunofluorescence of ovarian sections from sterilized mice 7 days after transplantation with RFP-transgenic SMSCs. Arrows indicate RFP staining in the ovarian stroma. B) RFP staining was observed around the antral follicle 21 days after transplantation. Asterisks indicate the antral follicle. C) RFP-positive cells were observed around granulosa cells in recipient ovaries 28 days after SMSC transplantation. D) RFP staining was observed in antral follicles of recipient ovaries 2 months after SMSC transplantation. Scale bars: A, C) 50 µm; B, D) 100 µm; A, insets) 20 µm; and B, D insets) 10 µm.</p

    Double-staining of RFP and AMH in antral follicles of recipient ovaries 2 months after SMSC transplantation.

    No full text
    <p>A) DAPI. B) RFP staining cells. C) AMH staining cells. D) Merged image of A, B, and C. Scale bars: 50 µm; insets) 20 µm.</p

    Histological evaluations of ovaries in treated, untreated control, and normal control animals by midline section and HE staining.

    No full text
    <p>Ovary sections from sterilized non-transplanted mice after (A) a 7-day recovery period and (B) a 14-day recovery period, which showing the hollow structure destroyed by chemotherapy. Ovary sections from sterilized non-transplanted mice showing fibrosis and reduced hollow structure after a (C) 28-day recovery period and (D) 2-month recovery period. Ovary sections from sterilized recipient mice at (E) 7 days, (F) 14 days, (G) 28 days, and (H) 2 months after transplantation of SMSCs. Primordial follicles are visible in F (arrows), developing follicles at various stages are visible in G and H. However, there were fewer such developing follicles in G than in H. The morphology of ovary section of normal (I), untreated (J), and treated (K) control animals. (H) The changes in the ovarian volumes in treated, untreated control, and normal control (**<i>P</i><0.01, *<i>P</i><0.05). Scale bars: (F) 100 µm, (A–E, G–H) 200 µm, (I–K) 500 µm.</p
    corecore