SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections among vaccinated individuals with rheumatic disease : Results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance provider registry

Funding Information: members of the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance and do not necessarily represent the views of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), EULAR, the UK National Health Service (NHS), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), the UK Department of Health or any other organisation. Competing interests KLH reports she has received non-personal speaker’s fees from AbbVie and grant income from BMS, UCB and Pfizer, all unrelated to this manuscript; KLH is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. LG reports personal consultant fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Biogen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB, and grants from Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi and Galapagos, all unrelated to this manuscript. AS reports research grants from a consortium of 14 companies (among them AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Fresenius Funding Information: Kabi, Gilead/Galapagos, Lilly, Mylan/Viatris, Hexal, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB) supporting the German RABBIT register and personal fees from lectures for AbbVie, MSD, Roche, BMS, Lilly and Pfizer, all unrelated to this manuscript. LC has not received fees or personal grants from any laboratory, but her institute works by contract for laboratories among other institutions, such as AbbVie Spain, Eisai, Gebro Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme España, Novartis Farmaceutica, Pfizer, Roche Farma, Sanofi-Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Actelion Pharmaceuticals España, Grünenthal and UCB Pharma. EF-M reports personal consultant fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Portugal and that LPCDR received support for specific activities: grants from AbbVie, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly Portugal, Sanofi, Grünenthal, MSD, Celgene, Medac, Pharmakern and GAfPA; grants and non-financial support from Pfizer; and non-financial support from Grünenthal, outside the submitted work. IB reports personal consultant fees from AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer and Janssen, all unrelated to this manuscript. JZ reports speaker fees from AbbVie, Novartis and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, all unrelated to this manuscript. GR-C reports personal consultant fees from Eli Lilly and Novartis, all unrelated to this manuscript. JS is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grant numbers: R01 AR077607, P30 AR070253 and P30 AR072577), and the R Bruce and Joan M Mickey Research Scholar Fund. JS has received research support from Amgen and Bristol Myers Squibb and performed consultancy for Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Inova, Janssen and Optum, unrelated to this work. LW receives speaker’s bureau fees from Aurinia Pharma, unrelated to this manuscript. SB reports no competing interests related to this work. He reports non-branded consulting fees for AbbVie, Horizon and Novartis (all <$10 000). MGM has no competing interests related to this work. She serves as a patient consultant for BMS, BI JNJ and Aurinia (all <$10 000). RG reports no competing interests related to this work. Outside of this work she reports personal and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and Cornerstones and travel assistance from Pfizer (all <$10 000). JH reports no competing interests related to this work. He is supported by grants from the Rheumatology Research Foundation and has salary support from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance. He has performed consulting for Novartis, Sobi and Biogen, all unrelated to this work (<$10 000). ESi reports non-financial support from Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, outside the submitted work. PS reports personal fees from the American College of Rheumatology/Wiley Publishing, outside the submitted work. ZW reports grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb and Principia/Sanofi and performed consultancy for Viela Bio and MedPace, outside the submitted work. His work is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health. PMM has received consulting/speaker’s fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this study. PMM is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). PCR reports no competing interests related to this work. Outside of this work PCR reports personal fees from AbbVie, Atom Bioscience, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kukdong, Novartis, UCB, Roche and Pfizer; meeting attendance support from BMS, Pfizer and UCB; and grant funding from Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma (all <$10 000). JY reports no competing interests related to this work. Her work is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (K24 AR074534 and P30 AR070155). Outside of this work, she has received research grants or performed consulting for Gilead, BMS Foundation, Pfizer, Aurinia and AstraZeneca. Funding Information: Twitter Jean Liew @rheum_cat, Loreto Carmona @carmona_loreto, Pedro M Machado @pedrommcmachado and Philip C Robinson @philipcrobinson Contributors All authors contributed to the study design, data collection, interpretation of results and review/approval of the final submitted manuscript. JL and MG are guarantors for this manuscript. Funding MG reports grants from the National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, outside the submitted work. KLH is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. JS is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grant numbers: R01 AR077607, P30 AR070253 and P30 AR072577), and the R Bruce and Joan M Mickey Research Scholar Fund. JH is supported by grants from the Rheumatology Research Foundation. ZW is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health. PMM is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). JY is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (K24 AR074534 and P30 AR070155). Publisher Copyright: ©Objective. While COVID-19 vaccination prevents severe infections, poor immunogenicity in immunocompromised people threatens vaccine effectiveness. We analysed the clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatic disease who developed breakthrough COVID-19 after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.  Methods. We included people partially or fully vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 who developed COVID-19 between 5 January and 30 September 2021 and were reported to the Global Rheumatology Alliance registry. Breakthrough infections were defined as occurring ≥14 days after completion of the vaccination series, specifically 14 days after the second dose in a two-dose series or 14 days after a single-dose vaccine. We analysed patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and COVID-19 symptoms and outcomes. Results SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 197 partially or fully vaccinated people with rheumatic disease (mean age 54 years, 77% female, 56% white). The majority (n=140/197, 71%) received messenger RNA vaccines. Among the fully vaccinated (n=87), infection occurred a mean of 112 (±60) days after the second vaccine dose. Among those fully vaccinated and hospitalised (n=22, age range 36-83 years), nine had used B cell-depleting therapy (BCDT), with six as monotherapy, at the time of vaccination. Three were on mycophenolate. The majority (n=14/22, 64%) were not taking systemic glucocorticoids. Eight patients had pre-existing lung disease and five patients died. Conclusion. More than half of fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections requiring hospitalisation were on BCDT or mycophenolate. Further risk mitigation strategies are likely needed to protect this selected high-risk population.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Obstetric Outcomes in Women with Rheumatic Disease and COVID-19 in the Context of Vaccination Status

OBJECTIVE: To describe obstetric outcomes based on COVID-19 vaccination status, in women with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) who developed COVID-19 during pregnancy. METHODS: Data regarding pregnant women entered into the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry from 24 March 2020-25 February 2022 were analysed. Obstetric outcomes were stratified by number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received prior to COVID-19 infection in pregnancy. Descriptive differences between groups were tested using the chi -square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: There were 73 pregnancies in 73 women with RMD and COVID-19. Overall, 24.7% (18) of pregnancies were ongoing, while of the 55 completed pregnancies 90.9% (50) of pregnancies resulted in livebirths. At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 60.3% (n = 44) of women were unvaccinated, 4.1% (n = 3) had received one vaccine dose while 35.6% (n = 26) had two or more doses. Although 83.6% (n = 61) of women required no treatment for COVID-19, 20.5% (n = 15) required hospital admission. COVID-19 resulted in delivery in 6.8% (n = 3) of unvaccinated women and 3.8% (n = 1) of fully vaccinated women. There was a greater number of preterm births (PTB) in unvaccinated women compared with fully vaccinated 29.5% (n = 13) vs 18.2%(n = 2). CONCLUSION: In this descriptive study, unvaccinated pregnant women with RMD and COVID-19 had a greater number of PTB compared with those fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Additionally, the need for COVID-19 pharmacological treatment was uncommon in pregnant women with RMD regardless of vaccination status. These results support active promotion of COVID-19 vaccination in women with RMD who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy

Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome

The sequence of the human genome encodes the genetic instructions for human physiology, as well as rich information about human evolution. In 2001, the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium reported a draft sequence of the euchromatic portion of the human genome. Since then, the international collaboration has worked to convert this draft into a genome sequence with high accuracy and nearly complete coverage. Here, we report the result of this finishing process. The current genome sequence (Build 35) contains 2.85 billion nucleotides interrupted by only 341 gaps. It covers ∼99% of the euchromatic genome and is accurate to an error rate of ∼1 event per 100,000 bases. Many of the remaining euchromatic gaps are associated with segmental duplications and will require focused work with new methods. The near-complete sequence, the first for a vertebrate, greatly improves the precision of biological analyses of the human genome including studies of gene number, birth and death. Notably, the human enome seems to encode only 20,000-25,000 protein-coding genes. The genome sequence reported here should serve as a firm foundation for biomedical research in the decades ahead

Spreading Support for Ukraine\u27s Water Issues

Currently, the water supply the Ukrainian people have is contaminated and unsafe to drink, putting those who do at risk of illness and disease. Many charities and fundraisers have fought to bring light to this situation in an attempt to supply the people with a clean supply of water. Our goal is to help raise awareness of their situation as well as of those charities dedicated to helping the Ukrainian people. This would be done through the medium of a page on a social media platform

A multidisciplinary-guided digital solution to data capture in early-phase clinical trials.

e18063 Background: Data capture in early phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCT) is usually via paper records with manual transcription to the sponsor’s case report form. Capturing real time trial data directly to computer (eSource) may reduce errors and increase completeness and timeliness of data entry. A simulated system pilot took place between Oct 2018 and Jan 2019 at an EPCCT facility to appraise Foundry Health’s eSource system “ClinSpark”. Aims were to assess consistency and effectiveness of creating electronic templates for source data capture and live data collection compliance. Methods: A multidisciplinary focus group (2 research nurses, 1 doctor, 3 data managers) was created to collaborate with Foundry Health staff. The focus group agreed on a 52 item user acceptance test listing ideal features for a data collection tool, classifying items as high, medium or low priority. Specialised features of the eSource system were adapted to handle the complex needs of EPCCT. The pilot incorporated a 5 day boot camp for familiarisation to the digital platform; a conference room test using simulated patient data; construction of a trial template including contingency planning; and a clinic floor test with live simulated patient data collection using digital tablets. Results: During the 3 month pilot, templates for 2 EPCCT were planned and created. Using eSource, 43 items (83%) of the acceptance test were passed compared with 27 items (52%) for the current (paper-based) system. The paper system did not pass any of the 9 items for which eSource failed. For the 30 high priority items, eSource passed 30 (100%) compared with 22 for the paper system (73%). Time saving and potential error reduction were noted as additional benefits. Conclusions: This process demonstrates that a multidisciplinary approach can be used to successfully integrate a customised eSource system working with previously untrained staff. Improved performance across pre-specified domains and potential additional benefits were noted. As FDA encourages the use of digital solutions in clinical trials, using eSource provides a potential solution for compliant and efficient capture of data from protocol assessments at investigator sites and rapid data transfer to sponsors. </jats:p

A multidisciplinary-guided digital solution to data capture in early-phase clinical trials.

e18063Background: Data capture in early phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCT) is usually via paper records with manual transcription to the sponsor’s case report form. Capturing real time trial data directly to computer (eSource) may reduce errors and increase completeness and timeliness of data entry. A simulated system pilot took place between Oct 2018 and Jan 2019 at an EPCCT facility to appraise Foundry Health’s eSource system “ClinSpark”. Aims were to assess consistency and effectiveness of creating electronic templates for source data capture and live data collection compliance. Methods: A multidisciplinary focus group (2 research nurses, 1 doctor, 3 data managers) was created to collaborate with Foundry Health staff. The focus group agreed on a 52 item user acceptance test listing ideal features for a data collection tool, classifying items as high, medium or low priority. Specialised features of the eSource system were adapted to handle the complex needs of EPCCT. The pilot incorporated a 5 day boot camp for familiarisation to the digital platform; a conference room test using simulated patient data; construction of a trial template including contingency planning; and a clinic floor test with live simulated patient data collection using digital tablets. Results: During the 3 month pilot, templates for 2 EPCCT were planned and created. Using eSource, 43 items (83%) of the acceptance test were passed compared with 27 items (52%) for the current (paper-based) system. The paper system did not pass any of the 9 items for which eSource failed. For the 30 high priority items, eSource passed 30 (100%) compared with 22 for the paper system (73%). Time saving and potential error reduction were noted as additional benefits. Conclusions: This process demonstrates that a multidisciplinary approach can be used to successfully integrate a customised eSource system working with previously untrained staff. Improved performance across pre-specified domains and potential additional benefits were noted. As FDA encourages the use of digital solutions in clinical trials, using eSource provides a potential solution for compliant and efficient capture of data from protocol assessments at investigator sites and rapid data transfer to sponsors

A multidisciplinary-tailored digital solution to data capture in early phase clinical trials.

2 Background: Data capture in early phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCT) is usually via paper records with manual transcription to the sponsor’s case report form. Capturing real time trial data directly to computer (eSource) may reduce errors and increase completeness and timeliness of data entry. A simulated system pilot took place between Oct 2018 and Jan 2019 at an EPCCT facility to appraise Foundry Health’s eSource system “ClinSpark”. Aims were to assess consistency and effectiveness of creating electronic templates for source data capture and live data collection compliance. Methods: A multidisciplinary focus group (MFG) (2 research nurses, 1 doctor, 3 data managers) was created to collaborate with Foundry Health staff. Specialised features of the eSource system were adapted to handle the complex needs of EPCCT. The pilot incorporated a 5 day boot camp for familiarisation to the digital platform; a conference room test using simulated patient data; construction of a trial template including contingency planning; and a clinic floor test with live simulated patient data collection using digital tablets. The MFG agreed on a 52 item user acceptance test listing ideal features for a data collection tool, with items classified as high, medium or low priority. Results: During the 3 month pilot, templates for 2 EPCCT were planned and created by the MFG. Using eSource, 43 items (83%) of the acceptance test were passed compared with 27 items (52%) for the current (paper) system. For the 30 high-priority items, eSource passed 30 (100%) compared with 22 for the paper system (73%). The paper system was not superior to eSource for any items assessed. Time saving and potential error reduction were noted as additional benefits. Conclusions: This process demonstrates that a multidisciplinary approach can be used to successfully integrate a customised eSource system working with previously untrained staff. Improved performance across pre-specified domains and potential additional benefits were noted. As FDA encourages use of digital solutions in clinical trials, using eSource provides a potential solution for compliant and efficient data capture from protocol assessments at investigator sites and rapid data transfer to sponsors. </jats:p