Additional file 3 of Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Additional file 3: Figure S3. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and random-effects estimates examining the high-quality rate of short interval versus long interval in ART program

Additional file 5 of Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Additional file 5: Figure S5. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and random-effects estimates examining the miscarriage rate of short interval versus long interval in ART program

Additional file 7 of Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Additional file 7: Figure S7. Publication bias analysis of fertilization rate of short interval versus long interval in ART program

Additional file 11 of Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Additional file 11: Appendix 1. Justifications in ROB

Additional file 4 of Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Additional file 4: Figure S4. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and random-effects estimates examining the clinical pregnancy rate of short interval versus long interval in ART program

Additional file 9 of Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Additional file 9: Figure S9. Publication bias analysis of clinical pregnancy rate of short interval versus long interval in ART program

Data

Dat

Additional file 8 of Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Additional file 8: Figure S8. Publication bias analysis of high-quality rate of short interval versus long interval in ART program

Additional file 10 of Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Additional file 10: Table SIa. ROB for oocyte maturation outcome. Table SIb. ROB for fertilization outcome. Table SIc. ROB for high-quality embryo outcome. Table SId. ROB for clinical pregnancy outcome. Table SIe. ROB for miscarriage outcome

Direct Deposit Laminate Nanocomposites with Enhanced Propellent Properties

One of the challenges in the use of energetic nanoparticles within a polymer matrix for propellant applications is obtaining high particle loading (high energy density) while maintaining mechanical integrity and reactivity. In this study, we explore a new strategy that utilizes laminate structures. Here, a laminate of alternating layers of aluminum nanoparticle (Al-NPs)/copper oxide nanoparticle (CuO-NPs) thermites in a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) reactive binder, with a spacer layer of PVDF was fabricated by a electrospray layer-by-layer deposition method. The deposited layers containing up to 60 wt % Al-NPs/CuO-NPs thermite are found to be uniform and mechanically flexible. Both the reactive and mechanical properties of laminate significantly outperformed the single-layer structure with the same material composition. These results suggest that deploying a multilayer laminate structure enables the incorporation of high loadings of energetic materials and, in some cases, enhances the reactive properties over the corresponding homogeneous structure. These results imply that an additive manufacturing approach may yield significant advantages in developing a tailored architecture for advanced propulsion systems