Enrichment of Integral Membrane Proteins for Proteomic Analysis Using Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry

An increasing number of proteomic strategies rely on liquid chromatography−tandem mass spectrometry (LC−MS/MS) to detect and identify constituent peptides of enzymatically digested proteins obtained from various organisms and cell types. However, sample preparation methods for isolating membrane proteins typically involve the use of detergents and chaotropes that often interfere with chromatographic separation and/or electrospray ionization. To address this problem, a sample preparation method combining carbonate extraction, surfactant-free organic solvent-assisted solubilization, and proteolysis was developed and demonstrated to target the membrane subproteome of Deinococcus radiodurans. Out of 503 proteins identified, 135 were recognized as hydrophobic on the basis of their calculated hydropathy values (GRAVY index), corresponding to coverage of 15% of the predicted hydrophobic proteome. Using the PSORT algorithm, 53 of the proteins identified were classified as integral outer membrane proteins and 215 were classified as integral cytoplasmic membrane proteins. All identified integral cytoplasmic membrane proteins had from 1 to 16 mapped transmembrane domains (TMDs), and 65% of those containing four or more mapped TMDs were identified by at least one hydrophobic membrane spanning peptide. The extensive coverage of the membrane subproteome (24%) by identification of highly hydrophobic proteins containing multiple TMDs validates the efficacy of the described sample preparation technique to isolate and solubilize hydrophobic integral membrane proteins from complex protein mixtures.Keywords: membrane proteins • sample preparation • hydrophobic proteins • proteomics • mass spectrometr

Integration of Electrokinetic-Based Multidimensional Separation/Concentration Platform with Electrospray Ionization-Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance-Mass Spectrometry for Proteome Analysis of <i>Shewanella oneidensis</i>

This work focuses on the development of a multidimensional electrokinetic-based separation/concentration platform coupled with electrospray ionization-Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI-FTICR-MS) for achieving the high resolution and ultrasensitive analysis of complex protein/peptide mixtures. A microdialysis junction is employed as the interface for on-line combination of capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF) with transient capillary isotachophoresis/zone electrophoresis (CITP/CZE) in an integrated platform. Besides the excellent resolving power afforded by both CIEF and CZE separations, the electrokinetic focusing/stacking effects of CIEF and CITP greatly enhance the dynamic range and detection sensitivity of MS for protein identification. The constructed multidimensional separation/concentration platform is demonstrated for the analysis of Shewanella oneidensis proteome, which has considerable implications toward the bioremediation of environmental pollutants. The electrokinetic-based platform offers the overall peak capacity comparable to those obtained using multidimensional chromatography systems, but with a much shorter run time and no need for column regeneration. Most importantly, a total of 1174 unique proteins, corresponding to 26.5% proteome coverage, are identified from the cytosolic fraction of S. oneidensis, while requiring <500 ng of proteolytic digest loaded in the CIEF capillary. The ultrasensitive capabilities of electrokinetic-based proteome approach are attributed to the concentration effect in CIEF, the electrokinetic stacking of CITP, the nanoscale peak volume in CZE, the “accurate mass tag” strategy for protein/peptide identification, and the high-sensitivity, high-resolution, and high-mass measurement accuracy of FTICR-MS

Peptide Storage: Are You Getting the Best Return on Your Investment? Defining Optimal Storage Conditions for Proteomics Samples

To comply with current proteomics guidelines, it is often necessary to analyze the same peptide samples several times. Between analyses, the sample must be stored in such a way as to conserve its intrinsic properties, without losing either peptides or signal intensity. This article describes two studies designed to define the optimal storage conditions for peptide samples between analyses. With the use of a label-free strategy, peptide conservation was compared over a 28-day period in three different recipients: standard plastic tubes, glass tubes, and low-adsorption plastic tubes. The results of this study showed that standard plastic tubes are unsuitable for peptide storage over the period studied. Glass tubes were found to perform better than standard plastic, but optimal peptide recovery was achieved using low-adsorption plastic tubes. The peptides showing poor recovery following storage were mainly hydrophobic in nature. The differences in peptide recovery between glass and low-adsorption plastic tubes were further studied using isotopically labeled proteins. This study allowed accurate comparison of peptide recovery between the two tube types within the same LC-MS run. The results of the label-free study were confirmed. Further, it was possible to demonstrate that peptide recovery in low-adsorption plastic tubes was optimal whatever the peptide concentration stored

Peptide Storage: Are You Getting the Best Return on Your Investment? Defining Optimal Storage Conditions for Proteomics Samples

To comply with current proteomics guidelines, it is often necessary to analyze the same peptide samples several times. Between analyses, the sample must be stored in such a way as to conserve its intrinsic properties, without losing either peptides or signal intensity. This article describes two studies designed to define the optimal storage conditions for peptide samples between analyses. With the use of a label-free strategy, peptide conservation was compared over a 28-day period in three different recipients: standard plastic tubes, glass tubes, and low-adsorption plastic tubes. The results of this study showed that standard plastic tubes are unsuitable for peptide storage over the period studied. Glass tubes were found to perform better than standard plastic, but optimal peptide recovery was achieved using low-adsorption plastic tubes. The peptides showing poor recovery following storage were mainly hydrophobic in nature. The differences in peptide recovery between glass and low-adsorption plastic tubes were further studied using isotopically labeled proteins. This study allowed accurate comparison of peptide recovery between the two tube types within the same LC-MS run. The results of the label-free study were confirmed. Further, it was possible to demonstrate that peptide recovery in low-adsorption plastic tubes was optimal whatever the peptide concentration stored

Peptide Storage: Are You Getting the Best Return on Your Investment? Defining Optimal Storage Conditions for Proteomics Samples

To comply with current proteomics guidelines, it is often necessary to analyze the same peptide samples several times. Between analyses, the sample must be stored in such a way as to conserve its intrinsic properties, without losing either peptides or signal intensity. This article describes two studies designed to define the optimal storage conditions for peptide samples between analyses. With the use of a label-free strategy, peptide conservation was compared over a 28-day period in three different recipients: standard plastic tubes, glass tubes, and low-adsorption plastic tubes. The results of this study showed that standard plastic tubes are unsuitable for peptide storage over the period studied. Glass tubes were found to perform better than standard plastic, but optimal peptide recovery was achieved using low-adsorption plastic tubes. The peptides showing poor recovery following storage were mainly hydrophobic in nature. The differences in peptide recovery between glass and low-adsorption plastic tubes were further studied using isotopically labeled proteins. This study allowed accurate comparison of peptide recovery between the two tube types within the same LC-MS run. The results of the label-free study were confirmed. Further, it was possible to demonstrate that peptide recovery in low-adsorption plastic tubes was optimal whatever the peptide concentration stored

Surface Acoustic Wave Nebulization Facilitating Lipid Mass Spectrometric Analysis

Surface acoustic wave nebulization (SAWN) is a novel method to transfer nonvolatile analytes directly from the aqueous phase to the gas phase for mass spectrometric analysis. The lower ion energetics of SAWN and its planar nature make it appealing for analytically challenging lipid samples. This challenge is a result of their amphipathic nature, labile nature, and tendency to form aggregates, which readily precipitate clogging capillaries used for electrospray ionization (ESI). Here, we report the use of SAWN to characterize the complex glycolipid, lipid A, which serves as the membrane anchor component of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and has a pronounced tendency to clog nano-ESI capillaries. We also show that unlike ESI SAWN is capable of ionizing labile phospholipids without fragmentation. Lastly, we compare the ease of use of SAWN to the more conventional infusion-based ESI methods and demonstrate the ability to generate higher order tandem mass spectral data of lipid A for automated structure assignment using our previously reported hierarchical tandem mass spectrometry (HiTMS) algorithm. The ease of generating SAWN-MSⁿ data combined with HiTMS interpretation offers the potential for high throughput lipid A structure analysis

Peptide Storage: Are You Getting the Best Return on Your Investment? Defining Optimal Storage Conditions for Proteomics Samples

To comply with current proteomics guidelines, it is often necessary to analyze the same peptide samples several times. Between analyses, the sample must be stored in such a way as to conserve its intrinsic properties, without losing either peptides or signal intensity. This article describes two studies designed to define the optimal storage conditions for peptide samples between analyses. With the use of a label-free strategy, peptide conservation was compared over a 28-day period in three different recipients: standard plastic tubes, glass tubes, and low-adsorption plastic tubes. The results of this study showed that standard plastic tubes are unsuitable for peptide storage over the period studied. Glass tubes were found to perform better than standard plastic, but optimal peptide recovery was achieved using low-adsorption plastic tubes. The peptides showing poor recovery following storage were mainly hydrophobic in nature. The differences in peptide recovery between glass and low-adsorption plastic tubes were further studied using isotopically labeled proteins. This study allowed accurate comparison of peptide recovery between the two tube types within the same LC-MS run. The results of the label-free study were confirmed. Further, it was possible to demonstrate that peptide recovery in low-adsorption plastic tubes was optimal whatever the peptide concentration stored

Peptide Storage: Are You Getting the Best Return on Your Investment? Defining Optimal Storage Conditions for Proteomics Samples

To comply with current proteomics guidelines, it is often necessary to analyze the same peptide samples several times. Between analyses, the sample must be stored in such a way as to conserve its intrinsic properties, without losing either peptides or signal intensity. This article describes two studies designed to define the optimal storage conditions for peptide samples between analyses. With the use of a label-free strategy, peptide conservation was compared over a 28-day period in three different recipients: standard plastic tubes, glass tubes, and low-adsorption plastic tubes. The results of this study showed that standard plastic tubes are unsuitable for peptide storage over the period studied. Glass tubes were found to perform better than standard plastic, but optimal peptide recovery was achieved using low-adsorption plastic tubes. The peptides showing poor recovery following storage were mainly hydrophobic in nature. The differences in peptide recovery between glass and low-adsorption plastic tubes were further studied using isotopically labeled proteins. This study allowed accurate comparison of peptide recovery between the two tube types within the same LC-MS run. The results of the label-free study were confirmed. Further, it was possible to demonstrate that peptide recovery in low-adsorption plastic tubes was optimal whatever the peptide concentration stored

Characterizing Nanoparticle Mass Distributions Using Charge-Independent Nanoresonator Mass Spectrometry

Due to their unique size-dependent properties, nanoparticles (NPs) have many industrial and biomedical applications. Although NPs are generally characterized based on the size or morphological analysis, the mass of whole particles can be of interest as it represents the total amount of material in the particle regardless of shape, density, or elemental composition. In addition, the shape of nonspherical NPs presents a conceptual challenge, making them difficult to characterize in terms of size or morphological characteristics. Here, we used a novel nano-electro-mechanical sensor mass spectrometry (NEMS-MS) technology to characterize the mass distributions of various NPs. For standard spherical gold NPs, mass distributions covered the range from ∼5 to 250 MDa (8 to ∼415 attograms). Applying the density of gold (19.3 g/cm3) and assuming perfect sphericity, these mass measurements were used to compute the equivalent diameters of the NPs. The sizes determined agreed well with the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging data, with deviations of ∼1.4%. Subsequently, we analyzed the mass distribution of ∼50 nm synthetic silicon dioxide particles, having determined their size by electron microscopy (SEM and TEM). Their estimated density was in line with the literature values derived from differential mobility analyzer and aerosol particle mass analyzer data. Finally, we examined the intact gold nanotetrapods and obtained a mass distribution revealing their controlled polydispersity. The presence of polyethylene glycol coating was also quantified and corroborated nuclear magnetic resonance observations. Our results demonstrate the potential of NEMS-MS-based measurements as an effective means to characterize NPs, whatever their composition, shape or density