13 research outputs found

    Video_4_Binding of Rap1 and Riam to Talin1 Fine-Tune β2 Integrin Activity During Leukocyte Trafficking.avi

    No full text
    β2 integrins mediate key processes during leukocyte trafficking. Upon leukocyte activation, the structurally bent β2 integrins change their conformation towards an extended, intermediate and eventually high affinity conformation, which mediate slow leukocyte rolling and firm arrest, respectively. Translocation of talin1 to integrin adhesion sites by interactions with the small GTPase Rap1 and the Rap1 effector Riam precede these processes. Using Rap1 binding mutant talin1 and Riam deficient mice we show a strong Riam-dependent T cell homing process to lymph nodes in adoptive transfer experiments and by intravital microscopy. Moreover, neutrophils from compound mutant mice exhibit strongly increased rolling velocities to inflamed cremaster muscle venules compared to single mutants. Using Hoxb8 cell derived neutrophils generated from the mutant mouse strains, we show that both pathways regulate leukocyte rolling and adhesion synergistically by inducing conformational changes of the β2 integrin ectodomain. Importantly, a simultaneous loss of both pathways results in a rolling phenotype similar to talin1 deficient neutrophils suggesting that β2 integrin regulation primarily occurs via these two pathways.</p

    Video_1_Binding of Rap1 and Riam to Talin1 Fine-Tune β2 Integrin Activity During Leukocyte Trafficking.avi

    No full text
    β2 integrins mediate key processes during leukocyte trafficking. Upon leukocyte activation, the structurally bent β2 integrins change their conformation towards an extended, intermediate and eventually high affinity conformation, which mediate slow leukocyte rolling and firm arrest, respectively. Translocation of talin1 to integrin adhesion sites by interactions with the small GTPase Rap1 and the Rap1 effector Riam precede these processes. Using Rap1 binding mutant talin1 and Riam deficient mice we show a strong Riam-dependent T cell homing process to lymph nodes in adoptive transfer experiments and by intravital microscopy. Moreover, neutrophils from compound mutant mice exhibit strongly increased rolling velocities to inflamed cremaster muscle venules compared to single mutants. Using Hoxb8 cell derived neutrophils generated from the mutant mouse strains, we show that both pathways regulate leukocyte rolling and adhesion synergistically by inducing conformational changes of the β2 integrin ectodomain. Importantly, a simultaneous loss of both pathways results in a rolling phenotype similar to talin1 deficient neutrophils suggesting that β2 integrin regulation primarily occurs via these two pathways.</p

    DataSheet_1_Binding of Rap1 and Riam to Talin1 Fine-Tune β2 Integrin Activity During Leukocyte Trafficking.pdf

    No full text
    β2 integrins mediate key processes during leukocyte trafficking. Upon leukocyte activation, the structurally bent β2 integrins change their conformation towards an extended, intermediate and eventually high affinity conformation, which mediate slow leukocyte rolling and firm arrest, respectively. Translocation of talin1 to integrin adhesion sites by interactions with the small GTPase Rap1 and the Rap1 effector Riam precede these processes. Using Rap1 binding mutant talin1 and Riam deficient mice we show a strong Riam-dependent T cell homing process to lymph nodes in adoptive transfer experiments and by intravital microscopy. Moreover, neutrophils from compound mutant mice exhibit strongly increased rolling velocities to inflamed cremaster muscle venules compared to single mutants. Using Hoxb8 cell derived neutrophils generated from the mutant mouse strains, we show that both pathways regulate leukocyte rolling and adhesion synergistically by inducing conformational changes of the β2 integrin ectodomain. Importantly, a simultaneous loss of both pathways results in a rolling phenotype similar to talin1 deficient neutrophils suggesting that β2 integrin regulation primarily occurs via these two pathways.</p

    Additional file 1 of 5ʹ-Ectonucleotidase CD73/NT5E supports EGFR-mediated invasion of HPV-negative head and neck carcinoma cells

    No full text
    Additional file 1: Figure S1. Cytotoxicity of 22E6 antibody in FaDu and Kyse30 cell lines. FaDu (A) and Kyse30 (B) cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of anti-CD73 22E6 antibody. Cell viability was assessed via WST8 measurements at 24 h (left panels) and 72 h (right panels). Shown are mean with SD from n = 3 independent experiments performed in triplicates. Ns: not significant

    Additional file 2 of 5ʹ-Ectonucleotidase CD73/NT5E supports EGFR-mediated invasion of HPV-negative head and neck carcinoma cells

    No full text
    Additional file 2: Figure S2. EGF activity, EGFR-EMT, EMT, p-EMT, MAPK and PI3K-Akt activity scores. Gene set variation analysis scores of EGF activity, EGFR-EMT, EMT, p-EMT, MAPK and PI3K-Akt activity were calculated for n = 2,176 malignant cells with n = 10 HPV-negative HNSCC patients within GSE103322. GSVA scores are depicted as violin plots for each patient individually. Patients 1–5 are CD73high, patients 6–10 are CD73low

    Additional file 1 of A transcriptomic map of EGFR-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition identifies prognostic and therapeutic targets for head and neck cancer

    No full text
    Additional file 1: SupplementaryFigure 1. Copy number variation and expression of EGFR in Kyse30and FaDu cells. Supplementary Figure 2. GSEA of EGF- and EpEX-treated Kyse30and FaDu cells. Supplementary Figure 3. Over-representation analysis of genesof the EGFR-mediated EMT signature. SupplementaryFigure 4. Comparison ofEGFR-mediated EMT, pEMT, and EMT signatures. Supplementary Figure 5. Comparisonof EMT signatures for prognostic purposes.Supplementary Figure 6. ITGB4,ITGA6, LAMA3, LAMB3, and LAMC2 expression in HNSCC. Supplementary Figure 7. ITGB4expression in malignant and non-malignant single cells in different cancerentities. Supplementary Figure 8. ITGA6 expression in malignant andnon-malignant single cells in different cancer entities. Supplementary Figure 9. LAMA3expression in malignant and non-malignant single cells in different cancerentities. Supplementary Figure 10. LAMB3 expression in malignant andnon-malignant single cells in different cancer entities. Supplementary Figure 11. LAMC2expression in malignant and non-malignant single cells in different cancerentities. Supplementary Figure 12. ITGB4 expression in knockdown clonesof Kyse30 and FaDu cells. Supplementary Figure 13. Wound healing capacity of control andITGB4-knockdown cell lines. SupplementaryFigure 14. Tumor buddingintensities in HNSCC
    corecore