Exploring the framework of assemblage moment matrices and its applications in device-independent characterizations

In a recent work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], a framework known by the name of "assemblage moment matrices" (AMMs) has been introduced for the device-independent quantification of quantum steerability and measurement incompatibility. In other words, even with no assumption made on the preparation device nor the measurement devices, one can make use of this framework to certify, directly from the observed data, the aforementioned quantum features. Here, we further explore the framework of AMM and provide improved device-independent bounds on the generalized robustness of entanglement, the incompatibility robustness and the incompatibility weight. We compare the tightness of our device-independent bounds against those obtained from other approaches. Along the way, we also provide an analytic form for the generalized robustness of entanglement for an arbitrary two-qudit isotropic state. When considering a Bell-type experiment in a tri- or more-partite scenario, we further show that the framework of AMM provides a natural way to characterize a superset to the set of quantum correlations, namely, one which also allows post-quantum steering.Comment: 17 pages, 6 figures. Comments welcome

Natural Framework for Device-Independent Quantification of Quantum Steerability, Measurement Incompatibility, and Self-Testing

We introduce the concept of assemblage moment matrices, i.e., a collection of matrices of expectation values, each associated with a conditional quantum state obtained in a steering experiment. We demonstrate how it can be used for quantum states and measurements characterization in a device-independent manner, i.e., without invoking any assumption about the measurement or the preparation device. Specifically, we show how the method can be used to lower bound the steerability of an underlying quantum state directly from the observed correlation between measurement outcomes. Combining such device-independent quantifications with earlier results established by Piani and Watrous [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 060404 (2015)], our approach immediately provides a device-independent lower bound on the generalized robustness of entanglement, as well as the usefulness of the underlying quantum state for a type of subchannel discrimination problem. In addition, by proving a quantitative relationship between steering robustness and the recently introduced incompatibility robustness, our approach also allows for a device-independent quantification of the incompatibility between various measurements performed in a Bell-type experiment. Explicit examples where such bounds provide a kind of self-testing of the performed measurements are provided.Comment: The core of these results were already presented at the Workshop on Quantum Nonlocality, Causal Structure and Device-independent Quantum Information on 14/12/2016; v2: closely approximates journal version; v3: title is updated as journal versio

Hierarchy in temporal quantum correlations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering is an intermediate quantum correlation that lies in between entanglement and Bell non-locality. Its temporal analogue, temporal steering, has recently been shown to have applications in quantum information and open quantum systems. Here, we show that there exists a hierarchy among the three temporal quantum correlations: temporal inseparability, temporal steering, and macrorealism. Given that the temporal inseparability can be used to define a measure of quantum causality, similarly the quantification of temporal steering can be viewed as a weaker measure of direct cause and can be used to distinguish between direct cause and common cause in a quantum network.Comment: 10 pages, 3 figure

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering: Its geometric quantification and witness

We propose a measure of quantum steerability, namely a convex steering monotone, based on the trace distance between a given assemblage and its corresponding closest assemblage admitting a local-hidden-state (LHS) model. We provide methods to estimate such a quantity, via lower and upper bounds, based on semidefinite programming. One of these upper bounds has a clear geometrical interpretation as a linear function of rescaled Euclidean distances in the Bloch sphere between the normalized quantum states of: (i) a given assemblage and (ii) an LHS assemblage. For a qubit-qubit quantum state, the above ideas also allow us to visualize various steerability properties of the state in the Bloch sphere via the so-called LHS surface. In particular, some steerability properties can be obtained by comparing such an LHS surface with a corresponding quantum steering ellipsoid. Thus, we propose a witness of steerability corresponding to the difference of the volumes enclosed by these two surfaces. This witness (which reveals the steerability of a quantum state) enables finding an optimal measurement basis, which can then be used to determine the proposed steering monotone (which describes the steerability of an assemblage) optimized over all mutually-unbiased bases

A thermodynamic approach to quantifying incompatible instruments

We consider a thermodynamic framework to quantify instrument incompatibility through a resource theory subject to thermodynamic constraints. In this resource theory, we use the minimal thermalisation time needed to erase incompatibility's signature to measure how incompatible an instrument is. We show that this measure has a clear operational meaning in some work extraction tasks, thereby uncovering the thermodynamic advantages of incompatible instruments. We further analyse the possibility and impossibility of extending the time for incompatible signature to survive under general evolution. Finally, we discuss the physical implications of our findings to measurement incompatibility and steering distillation.Comment: 5+6 pages, 1 figur