5 research outputs found
3D reconstruction in endonasal pituitary surgery
PURPOSE: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors is hindered by limited visibility and maneuverability due to the narrow nasal corridor, increasing the risk of complications. To address these challenges, we present a pipeline for 3D reconstruction of the sellar anatomy from monocular endoscopic videos to enhance intraoperative visualization and navigation. METHODS: Data were collected through a user study with trainee surgeons, and the procedure was conducted on 3D printed, anatomically correct phantom devices. To overcome limitations posed by the uniform, textureless surfaces of these devices, learned feature detectors and matchers were leveraged to extract meaningful information from the images. The matched features were reconstructed using COLMAP, and the resulting surfaces were evaluated using the iterative closest point algorithm against the CAD ground-truth surface of the printed phantoms. RESULTS: Most methods resulted in accurate reconstructions with moderate variability in cases with high blur or occlusions. Average RMSE values of 0.33 mm and 0.41 mm, for the two best methods, Dense Kernelized Feature Matching and SuperPoint with LightGlue, respectively, were obtained in the surface registrations across all test sequences, with a significantly higher computation time for Dense Kernelized Feature Matching. CONCLUSION: The proposed pipeline was able to accurately reconstruct anatomically correct 3D models of the phantom devices, showing potential for the use of learned feature detectors and matchers in real time for AR-guided navigation in pituitary surgery
Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries
Background: Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for patients discharged with opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after common surgical procedures.Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study collected data from patients undergoing common acute and elective general surgical, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic procedures. The primary outcomes were patient-reported time in severe pain measured on a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 100% and patient-reported satisfaction with pain relief during the first week following discharge. Data were collected by in-hospital chart review and patient telephone interview 1 week after discharge.Results: The study recruited 4273 patients from 144 centres in 25 countries; 1311 patients (30.7%) were prescribed opioid analgesia at discharge. Patients reported being in severe pain for 10 (i.q.r. 1-30)% of the first week after discharge and rated satisfaction with analgesia as 90 (i.q.r. 80-100) of 100. After adjustment for confounders, opioid analgesia on discharge was independently associated with increased pain severity (risk ratio 1.52, 95% c.i. 1.31 to 1.76; P < 0.001) and re-presentation to healthcare providers owing to side-effects of medication (OR 2.38, 95% c.i. 1.36 to 4.17; P = 0.004), but not with satisfaction with analgesia (beta coefficient 0.92, 95% c.i. -1.52 to 3.36; P = 0.468) compared with opioid-free analgesia. Although opioid prescribing varied greatly between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, patient-reported outcomes did not.Conclusion: Opioid analgesia prescription on surgical discharge is associated with a higher risk of re-presentation owing to side-effects of medication and increased patient-reported pain, but not with changes in patient-reported satisfaction. Opioid-free discharge analgesia should be adopted routinely
The Impact of Operative Video Review versus Annotation on Training in Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery: A Preclinical Randomised Controlled Study
Defining the bellwether procedures and processes for global trauma care: an international Delphi study
Background The complexity of delivering trauma care makes the assessment of its provision challenging. The identification of bellwether procedures has previously been successful in the evaluation of global surgical care; however, any equivalent in assessing trauma care is currently lacking. Through a Delphi process, we aimed to produce the bellwether procedures and processes for global trauma care.Methods A global Delphi process was undertaken with healthcare professionals and academics involved in trauma care from across the world. A list of potential procedures and processes was identified through literature review and expert opinion, along with subsequent additional options suggested by respondents. Three successive rounds were completed, with respondents rating the importance of each procedure or process to be undertaken at any hospital that cares for trauma patients using a five-point Likert scale.Results A total of 411 respondents from 78 countries completed the initial round of the Delphi process, with minimal attrition observed across rounds. Following three successive rounds of the Delphi and functional aggregation, nine bellwethers of global trauma care were determined, subdivided into three functional categories: ‘Resuscitation & Stabilisation’—(1) Advanced Airway Management, (2) Short-term C-spine Immobilisation, (3) Long Bone Immobilisation; ‘Diagnosis & Monitoring’—(4) Blood Gas Analysis, (5) Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) Scanning, (6) Continuous Access to CT Imaging; ‘Optimisation & Intervention’—(7) Blood Transfusion, (8) Tube Thoracostomy, (9) Laparotomy and Splenectomy.Conclusion The Global Trauma Care Delphi study has produced nine metrics that provide pragmatic indicators for the overall assessment of trauma care capabilities at any healthcare setting worldwide. These bellwethers of global trauma care can enable hospitals, local managers and health ministries to identify institutions or regions that may require more in-depth assessment, allowing standards in the management of traumatic injuries to improve
Predicting opioid consumption after surgical discharge: a multinational derivation and validation study using a foundation model
Opioids are frequently overprescribed after surgery. We applied a tabular foundation model to predict the risk of post-discharge opioid consumption. The model was trained and internally validated on an 80:20 training/test split of the ‘Opioid PrEscRiptions and usage After Surgery’ (ACTRN12621001451897p) study cohort, including adult patients undergoing general, orthopaedic, gynaecological and urological operations (n = 4267), with external validation in a distinct cohort of patients discharged after general surgical procedures (n = 826). The area under the receiver operator curve was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–0.88) at internal testing and 0.77 (95% CI 0.74–0.80) at external validation. Brier scores were 0.13 (95% CI 0.12–0.14) and 0.19 (95% CI 0.17–0.2). Patients with a <50% predicted risk of opioid consumption consumed a median of 0 oral morphine equivalents in the first week after surgery. Applying this model would reduce opioid prescriptions by 4.5% globally, and counterfactual modelling suggests without increasing time in severe pain (−4.3%, 95% CI −17.7 to 8.6)
