3 research outputs found

    A comprehensive review of renewables and electric vehicles hosting capacity in active distribution networks

    Get PDF
    © Copyright 2023 The Author(s). The excessive integration of renewable distributed generation (RDG) and electric vehicles (EVs) could be considered the two most problematic elements representing the greatest threat to the distribution network (DN) technical operation. In order to avoid going beyond technical limitations, the term hosting capacity (HC) was proposed to define the highest permitted amount of distributed generation (DG) or EVs that can be integrated safely into the DN. The connection of RDGs was first brought to the attention of researchers and DN operators since it accounts for the most notable portion of these technical issues. Hence, the phrase ‘DG-HC’ was initially proposed and evolved significantly over the last few years. Currently, EV integration in most DNs worldwide is still low, but given the worldwide support for clean transportation options, expectations are raised for a significant increase. As a result, it is anticipated that over the next years, the effect of EV integration on the DN will be highly noticeable, requiring greater attention from researchers and DN operators to define the accepted limits of EV penetration levels, ‘EV-HC,’ which is expected to pass along the same line of DG-HC. This article provides an in-depth review of both DG-HC and EV-HC. It first analyses how the DG-HC research has grown over the years and then studies the published EV-HC papers, illustrating to what extent there is a similarity between them and, finally, employs these analyses to expect future development in the EV-HC research area. This article includes the different uses of the term HC, the most common performance indices of DG-HC, the various methods for assessing DG-HC, the different techniques for DG-HC enhancement, the effects of integrating EVs on the DG-HC, and finally, calculating and enhancing methods for EV-HC

    Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries
    corecore