Catches of <i>Glossina palpalis palpalis</i> with 10 geo-referenced traps in Kwesikonfo Village (24 pigsties protected with ITN).

<p>Catch no. 1 and 2 represent the tsetse population at the start of the study, catch no. 12 after the experimental period.</p

Natural log transformation of total <i>G. p. palpalis</i> per day over 12 catches in Kwesikonfo Village.

<p>Evolution of catches before (surveys 1 and 2) and after protection (no. tsetse/traps/day). Least square regression: y = 4.7−0.328×(p = 0.002, R² = 0.634), significant.</p

Trypanosome prevalence in Kwesikonfo (protected) and Zorh (control) villages before and after intervention.

a,b<p>Superscript with different letter denote significant difference at p<0.05 level.</p

Pigsty protected with insecticide-treated net in Kwesikonfo.

<p>Pigsty protected with insecticide-treated net in Kwesikonfo.</p

Natural log transformation of total <i>G. p. palpalis</i> per day over 12 catches in Zorh Village (control village).

<p>Evolution of catches (no. tsetse/traps/day) in the absence of intervention. Least square regression: y = 4.7−0.025×(p = 0.62, R² = 0.026), not significant.</p

Emaciated trypanosome positive sow, Eastern Region, Ghana.

<p>Emaciated trypanosome positive sow, Eastern Region, Ghana.</p

Map of Kwesikonfo, Eastern Region; intervention village.

<p>Trap locations No. 1-10 (red), near pigsty locations No. 101–128 (green).</p

Catches of <i>Glossina palpalis palpalis</i> with 10 geo-referenced traps in Zorh Village (control village, 14 unprotected pigsties).

<p>Catch no. 1 and 2 represent the tsetse population at the start of the study, catch no. 12 after the experimental period.</p