247 research outputs found
Shiva diagrams for composite-boson many-body effects : How they work
The purpose of this paper is to show how the diagrammatic expansion in
fermion exchanges of scalar products of -composite-boson (``coboson'')
states can be obtained in a practical way. The hard algebra on which this
expansion is based, will be given in an independent publication.
Due to the composite nature of the particles, the scalar products of
-coboson states do not reduce to a set of Kronecker symbols, as for
elementary bosons, but contain subtle exchange terms between two or more
cobosons. These terms originate from Pauli exclusion between the fermionic
components of the particles. While our many-body theory for composite bosons
leads to write these scalar products as complicated sums of products of ``Pauli
scatterings'' between \emph{two} cobosons, they in fact correspond to fermion
exchanges between any number P of quantum particles, with .
These -body exchanges are nicely represented by the so-called ``Shiva
diagrams'', which are topologically different from Feynman diagrams, due to the
intrinsic many-body nature of Pauli exclusion from which they originate. These
Shiva diagrams in fact constitute the novel part of our composite-exciton
many-body theory which was up to now missing to get its full diagrammatic
representation. Using them, we can now ``see'' through diagrams the physics of
any quantity in which enters interacting excitons -- or more generally
composite bosons --, with fermion exchanges included in an \emph{exact} -- and
transparent -- way.Comment: To be published in Eur. Phys. J.
The trion as an exciton interacting with a carrier
The X trion is essentially an electron bound to an exciton. However, due
to the composite nature of the exciton, there is no way to write an
exciton-electron interaction potential. We can overcome this difficulty by
using a commutation technique similar to the one we introduced for excitons
interacting with excitons, which allows to take exactly into account the
close-to-boson character of the excitons. From it, we can obtain the X
trion creation operator in terms of exciton and electron. We can also derive
the X trion ladder diagram between an exciton and an electron. These are
the basic tools for future works on many-body effects involving trions
Density expansion of the energy of N close-to-boson excitons
Pauli exclusion between the carriers of excitons induces novel many-body
effects, quite different from the ones generated by Coulomb interaction. Using
our commutation technique for interacting close-to-boson particles, we here
calculate the hamiltonian expectation value in the -ground-state-exciton
state.Coulomb interaction enters this quantity at first order only by
construction ; nevertheless, due to Pauli exclusion, subtle many-body effects
take place, which give rise to terms in with
>. An \emph{exact} procedure to get these density dependent terms is given
How composite bosons really interact
The aim of this paper is to clarify the conceptual difference which exists
between the interactions of composite bosons and the interactions of elementary
bosons. A special focus is made on the physical processes which are missed when
composite bosons are replaced by elementary bosons. Although what is here said
directly applies to excitons, it is also valid for bosons in other fields than
semiconductor physics. We in particular explain how the two basic scatterings
-- Coulomb and Pauli -- of our many-body theory for composite excitons can be
extended to a pair of fermions which is not an Hamiltonian eigenstate -- as for
example a pair of trapped electrons, of current interest in quantum
information.Comment: 39 pages, 12 figure
Commutation technique for interacting close-to-boson excitons
The correct treatment of the close-to-boson character of excitons is known to
be a major problem. In a previous work, we have proposed a ``commutation
technique'' to include this close-to-boson character in their interactions. We
here extend this technique to excitons with spin degrees of freedom as they are
of crucial importance for many physical effects. Although the exciton total
angular momentum may appear rather appealing at first, we show that the
electron and hole angular momenta are much more appropriate when dealing with
scattering processes. As an application of this commutation technique to a
specific problem, we reconsider a previous calculation of the exciton-exciton
scattering rate and show that the proposed quantity is intrinsically incorrect
for fundamental reasons linked to the fermionic nature of the excitons
Commutation technique for an exciton photocreated close to a metal
Recently, we have derived the changes in the absorption spectrum of an
exciton when this exciton is photocreated close to a metal. The resolution of
this problem -- which has similarities with Fermi edge singularities -- has
been made possible by the introduction of ``exciton diagrams''. The validity of
this procedure relied on a dreadful calculation based on standard free electron
and free hole diagrams, with the semiconductor-metal interaction included at
second order only, and its intuitive extention to higher orders. Using the
commutation technique we recently introduced to deal with interacting excitons,
we are now able to \emph{prove} that this exciton diagram procedure is indeed
valid at any order in the interaction.
Faraday rotation in photoexcited semiconductors: an excitonic many-body effect
This letter assigns the Faraday rotation in photoexcited semiconductors to
``Pauli interactions'', \emph{i}. \emph{e}., carrier exchanges, between the
real excitons present in the sample and the virtual excitons coupled to the
parts of a linearly polarized light. While \emph{direct Coulomb}
interactions scatter bright excitons into bright excitons, whatever their spins
are, \emph{Pauli} interactions do it for bright excitons \emph{with same spin
only}. This makes these Pauli interactions entirely responsible for the
refractive index difference, which comes from processes in which the virtual
exciton which is created and the one which recombines are formed with different
carriers. To write this difference in terms of photon detuning and exciton
density, we use our new many-body theory for interacting excitons. Its multiarm
``Shiva'' diagrams for -body exchanges make transparent the physics involved
in the various terms. This work also shows the interesting link which exists
between Faraday rotation and the exciton optical Stark effect
- …