Mapping EUCTR and ClinicalTrials.gov onto comparable completion statuses.

Mapping EUCTR and ClinicalTrials.gov onto comparable completion statuses.</p

Sources of matches to generate dual-registered trials.

<p>Sources of matches to generate dual-registered trials.</p

Discrepancies in completion status in 'ongoing' dual registered trials.

<p>Discrepancies in completion status in 'ongoing' dual registered trials.</p

sj-docx-1-ctj-10.1177_17407745211073483 – Supplemental material for Trends and variation in data quality and availability on the European Union Clinical Trials Register: A cross-sectional study

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ctj-10.1177_17407745211073483 for Trends and variation in data quality and availability on the European Union Clinical Trials Register: A cross-sectional study by Nicholas J DeVito and Ben Goldacre in Clinical Trials</p

Proportion of dual-registered trials that are discrepant by year of EUCTR registration.

<p>Proportion of dual-registered trials that are discrepant by year of EUCTR registration.</p

Additional file 1: of Detecting change in comparison to peers in NHS prescribing data: a novel application of cumulative sum methodology

Appendix A. Code. Appendix B. Example graphs. (PDF 4946 kb

Protocol for a Randomised controlled trial of structured Educational sessions to Clinical Commissioning Groups and Assessing the impact on primary care Prescribing

Protocol for an agile evaluation of an NHS England intervention, based upon primary care prescribing data available at OpenPrescribing.net. Full author list contained within

Supplemental material for Six months on: NHS England needs to focus on dissemination, implementation and audit of its low-priority initiative

Supplemental material for Six months on: NHS England needs to focus on dissemination, implementation and audit of its low-priority initiative by Alex J Walker, Seb Bacon, Helen Curtis, Richard Croker, Brian MacKenna and Ben Goldacre in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine</p

Differences in individual risk predictions between risk scores and risks estimated using competing risk regression stratified by risk factors (selected results for larger differences).

<p>Differences in individual risk predictions between risk scores and risks estimated using competing risk regression stratified by risk factors (selected results for larger differences).</p

Consistency in risk predictions with risk scores or competing risk regression in predicting high and low CVD risk.

<p>Consistency in risk predictions with risk scores or competing risk regression in predicting high and low CVD risk.</p