6 research outputs found
Social due diligence in the Austrian export promotion procedure: Recommendations for implementing the revised OECD "Common Approaches for Officially Supported Export Credits and Environmental and Social Due Diligence" as adopted on 28 June 2012
Human rights impact assessments as a new tool for development policy?
Development policy affects human rights in manifold ways. For example, trade agreements can have an adverse impact on the rights to health or food by making essential medicines or goods less accessible or available. Or large-scale investment projects influence indigenous rights when they entail resettlement programs or the expropriation of traditional lands. Policy-makers have tried to tackle these issues by employing various impact assessment tools. These include, inter alia, the Sustainability Impact Assessments of EU trade agreements, and the impact assessments of projects by development finance institutions, which are commonly based upon the IFC Performance Standards. Traditionally, economic and environmental effects are at the centre of the existing tools, while social effects are only included to a lesser extent. This paper argues that the existing tools are insufficient for reasons that concern their legal status, their methodology and, in particular, their effectiveness. Human Rights Impact Assessments (HRIA) promise to cure some of these shortcomings. In the paper, the specific added-value of HRIAs, methodological approaches and challenges, and potential fields of application of HRIAs in development policy will be addressed
Defending refugee rights : international law and Europe's offshored immigration control /
European immigration control has been increasingly offshored in recent years. Various measures, such as the introduction of stricter visa requirements, carrier sanctions, and immigration liaison officers, effectively shifted immigration control away from the European border into third states' territories. As these extraterritorial controls are usually not accompanied by appropriate legal safeguards, they raise important questions from a human rights perspective. For refugees, in particular, they make access to protection increasingly unavailable. This book is therefore concerned with the question of how refugee rights can be upheld in situations of offshored immigration control. It answers this question from an interdisciplinary perspective, dealing with - theoretical concepts that need to be revisited in order to strengthen international law's effectiveness in these situations, such as the border and sovereignty; - the development, forms and rationales of offshored immigration control; and - legal instruments to ensure human rights protection in these cases, especially regarding the principle of non-refoulement.Includes bibliographical references (119-127) and index.Theoretical considerations -- Extraterritoral immigration control -- Defining and defending non-refoulement.European immigration control has been increasingly offshored in recent years. Various measures, such as the introduction of stricter visa requirements, carrier sanctions, and immigration liaison officers, effectively shifted immigration control away from the European border into third states' territories. As these extraterritorial controls are usually not accompanied by appropriate legal safeguards, they raise important questions from a human rights perspective. For refugees, in particular, they make access to protection increasingly unavailable. This book is therefore concerned with the question of how refugee rights can be upheld in situations of offshored immigration control. It answers this question from an interdisciplinary perspective, dealing with - theoretical concepts that need to be revisited in order to strengthen international law's effectiveness in these situations, such as the border and sovereignty; - the development, forms and rationales of offshored immigration control; and - legal instruments to ensure human rights protection in these cases, especially regarding the principle of non-refoulement
Economics for the right to work
This article argues that mainstream economic theory is one of the main reasons why the human right to work, which was recognized by the international community in 1966, appears not to have been taken seriously. In the mainstream discourse, labour is a cost, employment is a second-tier objective, individuals are resources with production specifications, and rights are rigidities. Economics based on human rights and seeking to promote the right to work must construe that right as more than just fighting unemployment, regard full employment as an end in itself and place the individual at the heart of its raison d’être
