Harlots and Hooligans: The Representation of Women in Hogarth’s Strolling Actresses Dressing in a Barn (1738)

The Licensing Act egregiously hindered the English theatrical community when it was placed into effect by King George II in 1737. Strolling actors were thereby forbidden to perform in new plays for profit, forcing acting troupes to disband. This act was widely protested throughout England at the time, most notably by artist William Hogarth in his etching titled Strolling Actresses Dressing in a Barn. This etching cleverly protests the Licensing Act as well as a myriad of quandaries that plagued 18th-century English society, namely, gender roles both on and off the stage. Yet, what exactly is the relationship between actresses in 18th-century England and the Licensing Act of 1737, and how does Hogarth’s etching Strolling Actresses Dressing in a Barn interact with this relationship? Building off of my presentation for the Kennesaw State University College of The Arts Research Forum, my research dissects Hogarth’s etching and unpacks the role of the woman central in the image. I have drawn connections between the censorship enforced upon the theatre community by the Licensing Act of 1737 and the constant suppression and sexualization of women in 18th-century England. I have also analyzed Hogarth’s repertoire of etchings that hold a specific political or social purpose in correlation to women or the theatre. I have investigated Hogarth’s theories on the sustainability of the Licensing Act and its ability to provide England with a safe theatrical community that glorified the church and state. My research will pioneer an exploration towards a greater understanding of the relationship between art as a medium of protest and its effects on society. Finally, this article will also reveal the importance of analyzing the extraordinary power of 18th-century women in theatre

Troubled Past, Golden Opportunity: Public Memory and Memorialization at the University of Southern Mississippi

This thesis argues that The University of Southern Mississippi (USM) consciously chooses to present historical narratives in its history in ways that best enhance the university’s image. Examining the narratives of M.M. Roberts and Oseola McCarty using the theoretical frameworks of public memory and collective memory study reveals that the way they are memorialized within university history include both conscious and subconscious silences that impact how they are remembered by the public. This thesis identifies gaps within these two historical narratives and shows how these gaps were influenced by factors designed to enhance the university’s public image. Overall, the public memory framework that is used in this work can be applied to the examination of historical narratives at other universities in the South and can enhance conversations surrounding the preservation and exposition of historical narratives that advance uncomfortable histories linked to white supremacy, racism, and discrimination on these campuses. Overall, this thesis challenges current interpretations of USM history and advocates for deep investigations that incorporate public memory analysis

NURS 360: What additional sensory cautions and individualized interventions would be beneficial to a child with autism spectrum disorder in a hospital setting?

Going to the hospital is very stressful but it can be almost impossible for patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). These children are at a larger risk for being admitted to the hospital because of periodic and chronic health complications and possible self harm or aggressive behaviors. Many hospitals are making strides to improve these children’s hospital experiences. Interventions include improving training and finding ways to make the environment sensory friendly. Implementing these tactics into the future can greatly improve patient outcome and encourage people with ASD to come back to healthcare environment when needed and not be as afraid

“When I sleep under the net, nothing bothers me; I sleep well and I’m happy”: Senegal’s culture of net use and how inconveniences to net use do not translate to net abandonment

Abstract Background Despite recent advances in the fight against the disease, malaria remains a serious threat to the health and well-being of populations in endemic countries. The use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) reduces contact between the vector and humans, thereby reducing transmission of the disease. LLINs have become an essential component of malaria control programmes worldwide. Methods The Culture of Net Use study used qualitative and quantitative methods in a longitudinal and iterative design over two phases, in order to capture changes in net use over a year and a half period and covering both dry and rainy seasons. Data were collected from a total of 56 households in eight regions to understand variations due to geographical, cultural, and universal coverage differences. At the time of the data collection, the universal coverage campaign had been completed in six of the eight regions (Dakar and Thies excluded). Results Perceived barriers to use were primarily related to the characteristics of the net itself, include shape, insecticide, and a variety of minority responses, such as perceived lack of mosquito density and being unaccustomed to using nets. Insecticide-related complaints found that insecticide did not present a significant barrier to use, but was cited as a nuisance. Feelings of suffocation continued to be the most commonly cited nuisance. Respondents who favoured the use of insecticide on nets appeared to be more aware of the health and malaria prevention benefits of the insecticide than those who perceived it negatively. Conclusion Despite prior evidence that barriers such as heat, shape, insecticide and perceived mosquito density contribute to non-use of LLINs in other countries, this study has shown that these factors are considered more as nuisances and that they do not consistently prevent the use of nets among respondents in Senegal. Of those who cited inconveniences with their nets, few were moved to stop using a net. Respondents from this study overcame these barriers and continue to value the importance of nets.http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109445/1/12936_2014_Article_3396.pd

School-Based Service Delivery Models and Interventions for Handwriting

This project was part of a research initiative in collaboration with Wendi Trummert, DrOT, OTR/L, a practicing school-based occupational therapist in the Puyallup School District. The purpose of our project was to compare the effectiveness of certain service delivery models and intervention approaches to improve handwriting outcomes for school-aged children. Our search of the literature yielded a total of 20 applicable research studies, which utilized a wide variety of models and approaches. There was limited research specifically comparing service delivery and/or specific components of handwriting interventions. Our findings indicated that there are a variety of effective service delivery models and approaches to handwriting interventions. Furthermore, direct practice was a consistent component of programs producing handwriting improvements. A recommendation for future research is to directly compare service delivery models and intervention approaches to handwriting. This would allow practitioners to identify which specific aspects of service delivery could best support handwriting for students. Our knowledge translation products were specifically designed for our collaborating practitioner to present to her colleagues within the Puyallup School District. These products included a prepared in-service presentation detailing our research and findings, handouts regarding service delivery and approaches, and an annotated bibliography including relevant research articles to inform practitioners. Post-product responses and feedback were overall positive from our collaborator, although we were not able to receive feedback from colleagues who participated in the presentation due to time constraints

ACUITY-BASED NURSE STAFFING

As future RNs preparing to enter the workforce in a few short months, we chose to explore the effects of nurse-to-patient ratios, specifically acuity-based staffing assignments. The Summit Medical Center’s 4th and 5th floor medical-surgical units currently utilize a fixed numerical assignment system, not considering the complexity of individual patients when assigning patients to nurses. This form of assignment-making poses potential problems with unequal workloads, contributes to an increase in nurse burnout, and potentially compromised care. Shifting to an acuity-based staffing ratio by utilizing a validated acuity assessment tool will work to improve patient outcomes and nurses’ job satisfaction. Such a change would require the combined efforts of nurse leaders, hospital management, and administrative and IT support, but the long-term benefits are undeniable. The effectiveness of the acuity-based staffing ratios would be measured using a combination of qualitative and quantitative data, such as patient outcomes, complication rates, medication errors, and surveys to assess nurse satisfaction with the change. Our goal is to improve the culture of care on these units by enhancing patient safety and supporting nurses in their ability to provide the highest quality of care to each of their patients

Benefits and Challenges of Support Facilitation in an Inclusive Classroom

The purpose of this inquiry was to determine the benefits and challenges of support facilitation in an inclusive classroom. To answer our inquiry questions, we (UNF ESE teacher candidates) collected data on general education (GE) teachers and the varying exceptional (VE) teachers’ perceptions of support facilitation at Coastal Middle School through surveys, observational walkthroughs, and teacher interviews. From the data, we discovered benefits and challenges in four overarching categories: teachers’ perceptions, collaboration, instruction, and student engagement themes. As a result of the data, we recommended that Coastal Middle School outline clear and explicit roles for both the GE teacher and the special education teacher during the co-planning and co-teaching process, train the teachers on how to co-plan together, inform them of co-teaching methods they can use, and to create a schedule where the VE teacher only needs to focus on one class during each period

Eye in the Sky

This project is separated into two parts: an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and a corresponding capsule. The UAV will be stored in the capsule as the pair is released from underwater and floats to the surface where the capsule will autonomously open and discharge the drone. Following release, the UAV will fly up and record video surveillance of the surrounding area. Finally, the UAV will record the data onto a micro SD card inserted in the monitor that shows the camera’s live feed. The objective is to design, build, test, and finalize a UAV and capsule that meet NUWC’s, the customer, specifications as much as possible. The overarching design for this system consists of a cylindrical capsule with chambers for the drone, electronic controls, controlled air flow, and the tank of compressed air. An Arduino UNO is programmed to trigger the flow of air that pushes the drone out after a certain number of seconds. The UAV is a quadcopter whose arms spread open by a simple spring mechanism once ejected from the capsule but sits linearly while inside the capsule. The capsule has been manufactured from aluminum and the drone uses the Vortex 250 Pro as a base but has been modified to feature the required fold-able arms. Testing has shown that the capsule functions as expected. It floats to the surface, maintains a vertical position, and ejects the UAV after the programmed number of seconds. Testing has also shown that the UAV’s physical body also functions as expected in terms of its arms springing open when no longer constrained within the capsule. Photos and videos have been successfully recorded onto the monitor. The drone’s flight was not tested due to unforeseen and currently unresolved software issues. Overall, if the drone was capable of flight, the team would expect the system to work well as a whole

Transforming (perceived) Rigidity in Environmental Law Through Adaptive Governance

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is often portrayed as a major source of instability and crisis in river basins of the U. S. West, where the needs of listed fish species frequently clash with agriculture dependent on federal irrigation projects subject to ESA Section 7 prohibitions on federal agency actions likely to jeopardize listed species or adversely modify critical habitat. Scholarship on Section 7 characterizes the process as unwaveringly rigid, the legal “hammer†forcing federal agencies to consider endangered species’ needs when proposing operations and management plans for federally funded irrigation. In this paper, we identify barriers to an integrated approach to Section 7 implementation and characterize a set of strategies for overcoming its rigidity that may have broader applicability. We draw on lessons derived from the Klamath Basin along the Oregon-California border, where cross-scale processes and venues involving interagency collaboration among leaders in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation supported efforts to replace an ecologically and socially fragmented Upper Basin/Lower Basin approach to ESA implementation fraught with conflict. The result was the nation’s first joint biological opinion (BiOp), which effectively institutionalized an adaptive, flexible, integrated approach to water sharing among competing interests. Keys to success included existing collaborative capacity related to shifting stakeholder networks, trust, and relationships and a shift in local agency culture facilitated by empathic leadership leading to a greater sense of shared responsibility for Section 7 compliance. A collaborative hydrologic modeling process enhanced participatory capacity, facilitated transformative social and technical learning, and cultivated greater understanding of the social-ecological system among key stakeholders. The 2013 joint BiOp exemplifies both governmental capacity for flexibility and evolution within the constraints of formal law and the potential for greater integration among federal agencies and between federal agencies and stakeholders involved in ESA implementation