7 research outputs found
Application of the Method of Molecular Voronoi–Dirichlet Polyhedra for Analysis of Noncovalent Interactions in Crystal Structures of Flufenamic AcidThe Current Record-Holder of the Number of Structurally Studied Polymorphs
Crystal
chemical analysis of eight polymorphs of flufenamic acid
(FFA, C<sub>14</sub>H<sub>10</sub>NO<sub>2</sub>F<sub>3</sub>)î—¸the
current record-holder of the number of structurally characterized
polymorphic modificationsî—¸was carried out using the method
of molecular Voronoi–Dirichlet polyhedra. It was proved that
every polymorph of FFA, as every polymorph of the previous record-holder
ROY (C<sub>12</sub>H<sub>9</sub>N<sub>3</sub>O<sub>2</sub>S), has
a unique set of types of intra- and intermolecular noncovalent interactions
ROY: Using the Method of Molecular Voronoi–Dirichlet Polyhedra to Examine the Fine Features of Conformational Polymorphism
Crystal chemical analysis of 12 polymorphs of 5-methyl-2-[(2-nitrophenyl)Âamino]-3-thiophenecarbonitrile
(ROY) (C12H9N3O2S)the
current record-holder of the number of structurally characterized
polymorphic modificationswas carried out using the method
of molecular Voronoi–Dirichlet (VD) polyhedra. Based on the k-Φ criterion, it was found that each of the 14 reported
to-date independent ROY molecules has a unique conformation. A method
for quantifying the significance of noncovalent interactions of various
natures together with a new type of graph showing average partial
contributions of single contacts of a given type to the values of
integral parameters was proposed. The capabilities of the method of
molecular VD polyhedra were successfully tested on the example of
several forms of ROY with multiple structural solutions. The analysis
showed that noncovalent interactions vary more between different forms
of ROY than between different structural solutions of the same form.
It was calculated that different structural solutions of the same
form of ROY may feature up to five varying noncovalent contacts. The k-Φ criterion approved itself as a very sensitive
parameter which can easily detect even the subtlest differences in
atomic interactions strictly and quantitatively
Quantification and Visualization of the Effect of Pressure and Temperature on Atomic Interactions in Crystal Structures with the Method of Molecular Voronoi–Dirichlet Polyhedra on the Example of ROY Polymorphs
Thirty crystal structures belonging to ROY polymorphs
(Y and OP
forms) were extracted from the Cambridge Structural Database and analyzed
using the method of molecular Voronoi–Dirichlet polyhedra.
These structures varied in collection pressure (up to ∼6 GPa)
and/or temperature (down to 40 K). The coincidence of the conformations
of crystallographically independent molecules of identical composition
and structure was established for the first time for three out of
30 crystal structures, which, on the other hand, featured different
packing arrangements. It was shown that when external conditions change,
quite significant variations can occur in the systems of atomic interactions
(including valence ones) while maintaining the symmetry and packing
of molecules in the crystal structure (without phase transitions),
which, in turn, can lead to changes in the macroscopic properties
of compounds. The previously introduced method for visualization of
the variation of noncovalent interactions in crystal structures was
expanded to cases when environmental parameters, pressure and temperature,
are considered instead of geometric characteristics. It was shown
that the method of molecular Voronoi–Dirichlet polyhedra makes
it possible to objectively and quantitatively describe and visualize
variations in atomic interactions with changes in pressure and temperature,
providing the possibility of establishing subsequent correlations
with the manifested macro properties. Variations in both single interatomic
contacts and some of their groups with changes in pressure and temperature
were examined in detail for the Y and OP forms of ROY. The most probable
reasons for the change in color of the Y form with increasing pressure
were suggested
Synthesis and X‑ray Crystallography of [Mg(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>][AnO<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>COO)<sub>3</sub>]<sub>2</sub> (An = U, Np, or Pu)
Synthesis and X-ray
crystallography of single crystals of [MgÂ(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]Â[AnO<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>COO)<sub>3</sub>]<sub>2</sub>, where An = U (<b>I</b>), Np (<b>II</b>), or
Pu (<b>III</b>), are reported. Compounds <b>I</b>–<b>III</b> are isostructural and crystallize in the trigonal crystal
system. The structures of <b>I</b>–<b>III</b> are
built of hydrated magnesium cations [MgÂ(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> and mononuclear [AnO<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>COO)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>−</sup> complexes, which belong
to the AB<sup>01</sup><sub>3</sub> crystallochemical group of uranyl
complexes (A = AnO<sub>2</sub><sup>2+</sup>, B<sup>01</sup> = C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>COO<sup>–</sup>). Peculiarities of intermolecular
interactions in the structures of [MgÂ(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]Â[UO<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>3</sub>]<sub>2</sub> complexes depending on the carboxylate
ion L (acetate, propionate, or <i>n</i>-butyrate) are investigated
using the method of molecular Voronoi–Dirichlet polyhedra.
Actinide contraction in the series of UÂ(VI)–NpÂ(VI)–PuÂ(VI)
in compounds <b>I</b>–<b>III</b> is reflected in
a decrease in the mean Anî—»O bond lengths and in the volume
and sphericity degree of Voronoi–Dirichlet polyhedra of An
atoms
New Complexes of Actinides with Monobromoacetate Ions: Synthesis and Structures
Synthesis,
FTIR spectral study, and X-ray diffraction analysis
of single crystals of (CH3)4NÂ[UO2(mba)3] (I), (CH3)4NÂ[NpO2(mba)2(NO3)] (II), (CH3)4NÂ[PuO2(mba)2(NO3)] (III), and (CH3)4NÂ[NpO2(mba)Â(NO3)2] (IV), where mba is a monobromoacetate ion (CH2BrCOO–), were conducted. The main structural units of crystals I–IV are mononuclear anionic complexes of the
[AnO2(mba)3]−, [AnO2(mba)2(NO3)]−, or [AnO2(mba)Â(NO3)2]− composition.
All these complex units are characterized with the same crystal-chemical
formula AB013 (A = AnO22+ and B01 = CH2BrCOO– or NO3–). Using the method of molecular Voronoi–Dirichlet polyhedra,
the contributions of various types of noncovalent interactions into
the formation of supramolecular structures of the obtained complexes
were characterized. The analysis of coordination modes of all monobromoacetate-containing
compounds from the Cambridge Structural Database was accomplished.
Actinide contraction in the studied compounds is discussed