3 research outputs found

    The Effect of Combined Sensory and Semantic Components on Audioā€“Visual Speech Perception in Older Adults

    Get PDF
    Previous studies have found that perception in older people benefits from multisensory over unisensory information. As normal speech recognition is affected by both the auditory input and the visual lip movements of the speaker, we investigated the efficiency of audio and visual integration in an older population by manipulating the relative reliability of the auditory and visual information in speech. We also investigated the role of the semantic context of the sentence to assess whether audioā€“visual integration is affected by top-down semantic processing. We presented participants with audioā€“visual sentences in which the visual component was either blurred or not blurred. We found that there was a greater cost in recall performance for semantically meaningless speech in the audioā€“visual ā€˜blurā€™ compared to audioā€“visual ā€˜no blurā€™ condition and this effect was specific to the older group. Our findings have implications for understanding how aging affects efficient multisensory integration for the perception of speech and suggests that multisensory inputs may benefit speech perception in older adults when the semantic content of the speech is unpredictable

    Does that look heavy to you? Perceived weight judgement in lifting actions in younger and older adults.

    Get PDF
    When interpreting other peopleā€™s movements or actions, observers may not only rely on the visual cues available in the observed movement, but they may also be able to ā€˜put themselves in the other personā€™s shoesā€™ by engaging brain systems involved in both ā€˜mentalizingā€™ and motor simulation. The ageing process brings changes in both perceptual and motor abilities, yet little is known about how these changes may affect the ability to accurately interpret other peopleā€™s actions. Here we investigated the effect of ageing on the ability to discriminate the weight of objects based on the movements of actors lifting these objects. Stimuli consisted of videos of an actor lifting a small box weighing 0.05 ā€“ 0.9 kg or a large box weighting 3 ā€“ 18 kg. In a four-alternative forced-choice task, younger and older participants reported the perceived weight of the box in each video. Overall, older participants were less sensitive than younger participants in discriminating the perceived weight of lifted boxes, an effect that was especially pronounced in the small box condition. Weight discrimination performance was better for the large box compared to the small box in both groups, due to greater saliency of the visual cues in this condition. These results suggest that older adults may require more salient visual cues to interpret the actions of others accurately. We discuss the potential contribution of age-related changes in visual and motor function on the observed effects and suggest that older adultsā€™ decline in the sensitivity to subtle visual cues may lead to greater reliance on visual analysis of the observed scene and its semantic context

    Susceptibility to a multisensory speech illusion in older persons is driven by perceptual processes

    Get PDF
    Recent studies suggest that multisensory integration is enhanced in older adults but it is not known whether this enhancement is solely driven by perceptual processes or affected by cognitive processes. Using the ā€˜McGurk illusionā€™, in Experiment 1 we found that audio-visual integration of incongruent audio-visual words was higher in older adults than in younger adults, although the recognition of either audio- or visual-only presented words was the same across groups. In Experiment 2 we tested recall of sentences within which an incongruent audio-visual speech word was embedded. The overall semantic meaning of the sentence was compatible with either one of the unisensory components of the target word and/or with the illusory percept. Older participants recalled more illusory audio-visual words in sentences than younger adults, however, there was no differential effect of word compatibility on recall for the two groups. Our findings suggest that the relatively high susceptibility to the audio-visual speech illusion in older participants is due more to perceptual than cognitive processing
    corecore