9 research outputs found

    (A) Daily weights during 14 days of postnatal exposure to E-cigarette vapors starting at PN day 2. From 7–14 days of postnatal exposure, pups exposed to 0% nicotine/PG or 2.4% nicotine/PG E-cigarette vapors had significantly lower weights compared to untreated mice (RA) (* p< 0.02). Mice exposed to 0% Nic/PG E-cigarette vapors were significantly smaller than 2.4% Nic/PG and room air mice throughout the exposure (p<0.03, error bars represent standard error of the means) (n = 11–31). (B) Serum cotinine levels from female pups exposed to 14 days of 2.4% Nic/PG or 0% Nic/PG E-cigarette vapors or room air controls (n = 4–7, error bars represent standard deviations).

    No full text
    <p>(A) Daily weights during 14 days of postnatal exposure to E-cigarette vapors starting at PN day 2. From 7–14 days of postnatal exposure, pups exposed to 0% nicotine/PG or 2.4% nicotine/PG E-cigarette vapors had significantly lower weights compared to untreated mice (RA) (* p< 0.02). Mice exposed to 0% Nic/PG E-cigarette vapors were significantly smaller than 2.4% Nic/PG and room air mice throughout the exposure (p<0.03, error bars represent standard error of the means) (n = 11–31). (B) Serum cotinine levels from female pups exposed to 14 days of 2.4% Nic/PG or 0% Nic/PG E-cigarette vapors or room air controls (n = 4–7, error bars represent standard deviations).</p

    Open Field Test.

    No full text
    <p>(A-B) There was a main effect of Day (F<sub>1,25</sub> = 4.994, p = 0.035). There was no effect of Treatment or Day x Treatment interaction. (C) <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare distance travelled on Day 1 between the 2.4% nicotine/PG exposed mice and each of the other two groups. Mice exposed to 2.4% nicotine/PG travelled significantly greater total distances than mice exposed to 0% nicotine/PG (t<sub>19</sub> = 2.205, p<0.04) and tended to travel a greater distance than mice exposed to room air (t<sub>13</sub> = 1.857, p<0.09). (D) Rearing behavior was significantly increased in mice exposed to 2.4% nicotine/PG compared to the other groups. This was confirmed in a significant main effect of Treatment (F<sub>1,25</sub> = 7.438, p = 0.003) in the absence of an effect of Day or Day x Treatment interaction. Analysis of each individual day revealed mice exposed to 2.4% nicotine/PG had a greater number of rears than mice exposed to 0% nicotine/PG on both days (t test p<0.0001, Day1; p<0.007, Day 2), and also a greater number of rears than mice exposed to room air on Day 1 (p<0.008). (n = 7–13)</p

    Water Maze testing with reversal learning.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Latency to the hidden platform during the initial place training phase. Over the course of training all three groups learned equally well to navigate to the hidden platform. (B) Illustration of data from trials in which the platform was unavailable. The figure shows the percent of time each group spent in the quadrant where the platform is normally located (Quad 1- target platform) versus the quadrant opposite of that (Quad 3). All three groups spent more time in the Target quadrant (Quad 1) relative to Quad 3 (p<0.001), (white line represents chance levels (25%). (C) Latency to locate hidden platform at new location in reversal training trials. Similar to training during initial place learning, all three groups decreased the time to the escape platform in a similar manner (p<0.001). (D) The percent time in each quadrant during the final probe trial after all training has been completed. In this trial the 2.4% nicotine/PG exposed mice trended towards a spatial bias for the new platform location, however analysis yielded only a marginal effect of Quadrant (F<sub>1,25</sub> = 2.986, p < 0.096). The marginal effect prompted an analysis by one sample <i>t</i>-tests to compare each groups time in the new location to chance (25%), and only the 2.4% nicotine/PG exposed mice spent significantly more than 25% of time in the new location (t<sub>7</sub> = 2.632, p < 0.034, n = 7–13).</p

    Adult Behavior in Male Mice Exposed to E-Cigarette Nicotine Vapors during Late Prenatal and Early Postnatal Life

    No full text
    <div><p>Nicotine exposure has been associated with an increased likelihood of developing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in offspring of mothers who smoked during pregnancy. The goal of this study was to determine if exposure to E-cigarette nicotine vapors during late prenatal and early postnatal life altered behavior in adult mice.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Timed-pregnant C57BL/6J mice were exposed to 2.4% nicotine in propylene glycol (PG) or 0% nicotine /PG once a day from gestational day 15 until delivery. After delivery, offspring and mothers were exposed to E-cigarette vapors for an additional 14 days from postnatal day 2 through 16. Following their last exposure serum cotinine levels were measured in female juvenile mice. Male mice underwent behavioral testing at 14 weeks of age to assess sensorimotor, affective, and cognitive functional domains.</p><p>Results</p><p>Adult male mice exposed to 2.4% nicotine/PG E-cigarette vapors had significantly more head dips in the zero maze test and higher levels of rearing activity in the open field test compared to 0% nicotine/PG exposed mice and untreated controls. In the water maze test after reversal training, the 2.4% nicotine/PG mice spent more than 25% of time in the new location whereas the other groups did not.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Adult male mice exhibited increased levels of activity in the zero maze and open field tests when exposed to E-cigarette vapor containing nicotine during late prenatal and early postnatal life. These findings indicate that nicotine exposure from E-cigarettes may cause persistent behavioral changes when exposure occurs during a period of rapid brain growth.</p></div

    Elevated Zero Maze Test.

    No full text
    <p>Head dips were significantly greater in the 2.4% nicotine/PG mice compared to either the 0% nicotine/PG or the untreated mice (RA). (n = 7–13)</p

    Rotarod Test.

    No full text
    <p>Mean latency to fall during the three training sessions. There was no difference between any of the treatment groups from day 1 through day 3. As training progressed all groups of mice demonstrated increased latencies before falling which was confirmed by ANOVA, which yielded a main effect of Day (p < 0.001). (n = 7–13)</p

    Effect of E-cigarette emissions on total body weight and mean linear intercept.

    No full text
    <p><b>A.</b> Neonatal mice and their mothers were placed in a chamber and exposed to E-cigarette emissions starting at 24 hours of life. Age-matched control mice were kept in room air. Mice were exposed to either, 0% nicotine/PG or 1.8% nicotine/PG, once a day (400μl cartridge) for the first two days of life, then twice a day for an additional 7 days. Room air mice in trial one and trial two were significantly heavier at days of life 6 and 3 respectively compared to age-matched 1.8% nicotine/PG exposed mice (*<i>p</i><0.05) and remained significantly heavier up through 10 days of life. (n = 5–13 per group, error bars reflect standard deviation). <b>B.</b> Neonatal mice exposed to 1.8% nicotine/PG had a larger MLI, after adjusting for sex and weight compared to mice exposed to room air (Trial 1: <i>p</i><0.054 and Trial 2: <i>p</i><0.006). In trial 2 neonatal mice exposed to 1.8% nicotine/PG had significantly larger MLI than 0% nicotine/PG exposed mice (<i>p</i><0.014). (n = 5–8 per group, error bars reflect standard error of the mean).</p

    Decreased cell proliferation in airspaces of neonatal mice exposed to 1.8% nicotine/PG.

    No full text
    <p><b>A.</b> Arrows point to KI67 staining in the airspaces of 10 day old neonatal mice. <b>B.</b> Quantification of KI67 staining showed significantly less KI67 staining in 10 day old neonatal mice chronically exposed to 1.8% nicotine/PG compared to room air and 0% nicotine/PG treated mice. (n = 8 per group, error bars reflect standard error of the mean).</p

    Plasma and urine cotinine levels in 10 day old mice.

    No full text
    <p>Neonatal mice exposed to 1.8% nicotine/PG containing E-cigarette emissions for nine consecutive days in trial one had significantly higher levels of plasma and urine cotinine respectively compared to 0% nicotine/PG exposed mice and room air control mice (± standard error of the mean).</p><p>Plasma and urine cotinine levels in 10 day old mice.</p
    corecore