28 research outputs found
Definition of target radiological responses.
<p>Definition of target radiological responses.</p
Expected survival of three hypothetical patients.
<p>Base on the equation in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0082225#pone-0082225-t004" target="_blank">Table 4</a>, the expected survival probability can be calculated in individual patients with score 2.1, 2.6, and 3.1, respectively.</p
Patient baseline demographics and tumor characteristics.
<p>[interquartile range] are shown. HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; NASH, Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; MELD, the model for end stage liver disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; AFP, a-fetoprotein.<sup></sup> Number (proportion) or median </p
The survival probabilities among patients with good, fair and poor prognosis.
<p>Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to compare survival among patients with good, fair, and poor prognosis defined by the score according to the model at one month post-SIRT.</p
Calculation of Probability of Survival According to the Risk Score.
<p><sub>0</sub> (t) gives the estimated survival probabilities for a patient with a risk score of 2.6 which is the mean risk score of the whole patients in this study. To calculate the probability of survival at t months of a given patient use the following equation: S(t) = S<sub>0</sub>(t)<sup>exp(score−2.6)</sup>.<sup></sup> S</p
The overall survival in the whole series.
<p>Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to show the overall survival of the whole HCC patients after SIRT.</p
Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to compare survival between PR, SD, and PD according to three radiological assessment methods.
<p>HCC patients undergoing SIRT had radiological responses, as evaluated by three criteria: (A) RECIST 1.1, (B) mRECIST, and (C) Choi, carried out at one month post-SIRT.</p
Graphical illustration of Pearson’s product moment correlation of SUV<sub>max</sub> vs. ADC <sub>aver</sub>.
<p>The scatter plot demonstrates a weak negative correlation between SUV<sub>max</sub> and ADC<sub>aver</sub> (R = −0.24), which is statistically not significant (p = 0.179).</p
Patient with a biopsy proven prostate cancer of the right transitional zone (Gleason score 3+4 = 7).
<p>Images from simultaneous [<sup>18</sup>F] choline PET/MRI. A) T2-weighted image showing an ill-defined hypo-intense lesion of the right transitional zone. B) Diffusion-weighted image at a b-value of 1000 displaying a hyper-intense signal within the lesion indicating restricted water diffusion. C) ADC map with a corresponding hypo-intensity of the lesion. D) PET image showing a focal uptake of (18F) choline of the lesion. E) Fused MRI/PET image.</p
Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Risk Factors for Survival.
<p> = viral, 0 = nonviral.<sup></sup> Etiology: 1</p><p> = 1, 2 = 2–5, 3 = 5 or greater.<sup></sup> Number of nodules: 1</p><p> = <3 cm, 2 = 3–10 cm, 3 = >10 cm.<sup></sup> Size: 1</p><p> = PR or CR, 2 = SD, 3 = PD.<sup></sup> Choi response: 1</p
