Automated interictal source localisation based on high-density EEG

Purpose: To study the accuracy of automated interictal EEG source localisation based on high-density EEG, and to compare it to low-density EEG. Methods: Thirty patients operated for pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy were retrospectively examined. Twelve months after resective brain surgery, 18 were seizure-free or had 'auras' only, while 12 had persistence of disabling seizures. Presurgical 257-channel EEG lasting 3-20 h was down-sampled to 25, 40, and 204 channels for separate analyses. For each electrode setup, interictal spikes were detected, clustered, and averaged automatically before validation by an expert reviewer. An individual 6-layer finite difference head model and the standardised low-resolution electromagnetic tomography were used to localise the maximum source activity of the most prevalent spike. Sublobar concordance with the resected brain area was visually assessed and related to favourable vs. unfavourable postsurgical outcome. Results: Depending on the EEG setup, epileptic spikes were detected in 21-24 patients (70-80%). The median number of single spikes per average was 470 (range 17-15,066). Diagnostic sensitivity of EEG source localisation was 58-75%, specificity was 50-67%, and overall accuracy was 55-71%. There were no significant differences between low- and high-density EEG setups with 25 to 257 electrodes. Conclusion: Automated high-density EEG source localisation provides meaningful information in the majority of cases. With hundreds of single spikes averaged, diagnostic accuracy is similar in high- and low-density EEG. Therefore, low-density EEG may be sufficient for interictal EEG source localisation if high numbers of spikes are available

Ictal EEG source imaging and connectivity to localize the seizure onset zone in extratemporal lobe epilepsy

Purpose To evaluate the yield of Functional Connectivity (FC) in addition to low-density ictal Electrical Source Imaging (ESI) in extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE), using an automated algorithm for analysis. Method Long-term EEG monitoring of consecutive ETLE patients who underwent surgery was reviewed by epileptologists, and seizure onsets characterized by rhythmical activity were identified. A spectrogram-based algorithm was developed to select objectively the parameters of ESI analysis. Two methods for SOZ localization were compared: i) ESI power, based on LORETA exclusively; ii) ESI + FC, including a Granger causality-based connectivity analysis. Results were determined at a sublobar level. The resection zone, in relation to 1-year follow-up surgical outcome, was considered as reference standard for diagnostic accuracy analyses. Results Ninety-four seizures from 24 patients were analyzed. At seizure-level, ESI power showed 36 % sensitivity and 72 % specificity (accuracy: 45 %). ESI + FC significantly improved the accuracy, with 52 % sensitivity and 84 % specificity (accuracy: 61 %, p = 0.04). Results of ESI + FC were equally valuable in patients with lateralized or bilateral/generalized visual interpretation of ictal EEG. In a patient level sub-analysis, upon blinded clinical interpretation, ESI + FC showed a correct localization in 67 % of patients and substantial inter-rater agreement (kappa = 0.64), against 27 % achieved by ESI power, with fair inter-rater agreement (kappa = 0.37). Conclusion FC significantly improves SOZ localization compared to ESI solely in ETLE. Ictal ESI + FC could represent a novel option in the armamentarium of presurgical evaluation, aiding also in patients with visually non-localizable scalp ictal EEG. Prospective studies evaluating the clinical added value of automated low-density ictal ESI may be justified

Detection of interictal epileptiform discharges in an extended scalp EEG array and high‐density EEG – a prospective multicenter study

ObjectivesHigh counts of averaged interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are key components of accurate interictal electric source imaging (ESI) in patients with focal epilepsy. Automated detections may be time-efficient, but they need to identify the correct IED types. Thus, we compared semiautomated and automated detection of IED types in long-term video EEG monitoring (LTM) using an extended scalp EEG array and short-term high-density EEG (hdEEG) with visual detection of IED types and the seizure onset zone (SOZ).MethodsWe prospectively recruited consecutive patients from four epilepsy centers who underwent both LTM with 40 electrodes scalp EEG and short-term hdEEG with 256 electrodes. Only patients with a single circumscribed SOZ in LTM were included. In LTM and hdEEG, IED types were identified visually, semiautomatically and automatically. Concordances of semiautomated and automated detections in LTM and hdEEG as well as visual detections in hdEEG were compared against visually detected IED types and the SOZ in LTM.ResultsFifty-two out of 62 patients with LTM and hdEEG were included. The most frequent IED types per patient, detected semiautomatically and automatically in LTM and visually in hdEEG, were significantly concordant with the most frequently visually identified IED type in LTM and the SOZ. Semiautomated and automated detections of IED types in hdEEG were significantly concordant with visually identified IED types in LTM only when IED types with more than 50 detected single IEDs were selected. The threshold of 50 detected IED in hdEEG was reached in half of the patients. For all IED types per patient, agreement between visual and semiautomated detections in LTM was high.SignificanceSemiautomated and automated detections of IED types in LTM show significant agreement with visually detected IED types and the SOZ. In short-term hdEEG, semiautomated detections of IED types are concordant with visually detected IED types and the SOZ in LTM if high IED counts were detected

Automated Electrical Source Imaging with scalp EEG to define the insular irritative zone: comparison with simultaneous intracranial EEG

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of automated interictal low-density electrical source imaging (LD-ESI) to define the insular irritative zone (IZ) by comparing the concomitant interictal ESI localization with the SEEG interictal activity. Methods Long-term concomitant scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and stereo-EEG (SEEG) with at least one depth electrode exploring the operculo-insular region(s) were analyzed. Automated interictal ESI was performed on the scalp EEG using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography and individual head models. A two-step analysis was performed: i) sublobar concordance between cluster-based ESI localization and SEEG-based IZ; ii) time-locked ESI-/SEEG analysis. Diagnostic accuracy values were calculated using SEEG as reference standard. Subgroup analysis was carried out, based on the involvement of insular contacts in the seizure onset and patterns of insular interictal activity. Results Thirty patients were included in the study. ESI showed an overall accuracy of 53% (C.I. 29-76%). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 53% (C.I. 29-76%), 55% (C.I. 23-83%) respectively. Higher accuracy was found in patients with frequent and dominant interictal insular spikes. Conclusions LD-ESI defines with good accuracy the insular implication in the IZ, which is not possible with classical interictal scalp EEG interpretation. Significance Automated LD-ESI may be a valuable additional tool to characterize the epileptogenic zone in epilepsies with suspected insular involvement