sj-pdf-1-wso-10.1177_17474930211008701 - Supplemental material for Drip-and-ship versus mothership for endovascular treatment of acute stroke: A comparative effectiveness analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-wso-10.1177_17474930211008701 for Drip-and-ship versus mothership for endovascular treatment of acute stroke: A comparative effectiveness analysis by Xiao Wu, Charles R Wira, Charles C Matouk, Howard P. Forman, Dheeraj Gandhi, Pina Sanelli, Joseph Schindler and Ajay Malhotra in International Journal of Stroke</p

Image_2_Trends in Development of Novel Machine Learning Methods for the Identification of Gliomas in Datasets That Include Non-Glioma Images: A Systematic Review.jpeg

PurposeMachine learning has been applied to the diagnostic imaging of gliomas to augment classification, prognostication, segmentation, and treatment planning. A systematic literature review was performed to identify how machine learning has been applied to identify gliomas in datasets which include non-glioma images thereby simulating normal clinical practice.Materials and MethodsFour databases were searched by a medical librarian and confirmed by a second librarian for all articles published prior to February 1, 2021: Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science-Core Collection. The search strategy included both keywords and controlled vocabulary combining the terms for: artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, radiomics, magnetic resonance imaging, glioma, as well as related terms. The review was conducted in stepwise fashion with abstract screening, full text screening, and data extraction. Quality of reporting was assessed using TRIPOD criteria.ResultsA total of 11,727 candidate articles were identified, of which 12 articles were included in the final analysis. Studies investigated the differentiation of normal from abnormal images in datasets which include gliomas (7 articles) and the differentiation of glioma images from non-glioma or normal images (5 articles). Single institution datasets were most common (5 articles) followed by BRATS (3 articles). The median sample size was 280 patients. Algorithm testing strategies consisted of five-fold cross validation (5 articles), and the use of exclusive sets of images within the same dataset for training and for testing (7 articles). Neural networks were the most common type of algorithm (10 articles). The accuracy of algorithms ranged from 0.75 to 1.00 (median 0.96, 10 articles). Quality of reporting assessment utilizing TRIPOD criteria yielded a mean individual TRIPOD ratio of 0.50 (standard deviation 0.14, range 0.37 to 0.85).ConclusionSystematic review investigating the identification of gliomas in datasets which include non-glioma images demonstrated multiple limitations hindering the application of these algorithms to clinical practice. These included limited datasets, a lack of generalizable algorithm training and testing strategies, and poor quality of reporting. The development of more robust and heterogeneous datasets is needed for algorithm development. Future studies would benefit from using external datasets for algorithm testing as well as placing increased attention on quality of reporting standards.Systematic Review Registrationwww.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020209938, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020209938).</p

List of features, summarized into clinical categories.

List of features, summarized into clinical categories.</p

NIHSS and decision rule performance.

BackgroundPatients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dizziness may be imaged via CTA head and neck to detect acute vascular pathology including large vessel occlusion. We identify commonly documented clinical variables which could delineate dizzy patients with near zero risk of acute vascular abnormality on CTA.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of adult ED encounters with chief complaint of dizziness and CTA head and neck imaging at three EDs between 1/1/2014-12/31/2017. A decision rule was derived to exclude acute vascular pathology tested on a separate validation cohort; sensitivity analysis was performed using dizzy “stroke code” presentations.ResultsTesting, validation, and sensitivity analysis cohorts were composed of 1072, 357, and 81 cases with 41, 6, and 12 instances of acute vascular pathology respectively. The decision rule had the following features: no past medical history of stroke, arterial dissection, or transient ischemic attack (including unexplained aphasia, incoordination, or ataxia); no history of coronary artery disease, diabetes, migraines, current/long-term smoker, and current/long-term anti-coagulation or anti-platelet medication use. In the derivation phase, the rule had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 0.91–1.00), specificity of 59% (95% CI: 0.56–0.62), and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 0.99–1.00). In the validation phase, the rule had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 0.61–1.00), specificity of 53% (95% CI: 0.48–0.58), and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 0.98–1.00). The rule performed similarly on dizzy stroke codes and was more sensitive/predictive than all NIHSS cut-offs. CTAs for dizziness might be avoidable in 52% (95% CI: 0.47–0.57) of cases.ConclusionsA collection of clinical factors may be able to “exclude” acute vascular pathology in up to half of patients imaged by CTA for dizziness. These findings require further development and prospective validation, though could improve the evaluation of dizzy patients in the ED.</div

Demographic and characteristics of cases with and without acute vascular pathology.

Demographic and characteristics of cases with and without acute vascular pathology.</p

Image_1_Trends in Development of Novel Machine Learning Methods for the Identification of Gliomas in Datasets That Include Non-Glioma Images: A Systematic Review.jpeg

PurposeMachine learning has been applied to the diagnostic imaging of gliomas to augment classification, prognostication, segmentation, and treatment planning. A systematic literature review was performed to identify how machine learning has been applied to identify gliomas in datasets which include non-glioma images thereby simulating normal clinical practice.Materials and MethodsFour databases were searched by a medical librarian and confirmed by a second librarian for all articles published prior to February 1, 2021: Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science-Core Collection. The search strategy included both keywords and controlled vocabulary combining the terms for: artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, radiomics, magnetic resonance imaging, glioma, as well as related terms. The review was conducted in stepwise fashion with abstract screening, full text screening, and data extraction. Quality of reporting was assessed using TRIPOD criteria.ResultsA total of 11,727 candidate articles were identified, of which 12 articles were included in the final analysis. Studies investigated the differentiation of normal from abnormal images in datasets which include gliomas (7 articles) and the differentiation of glioma images from non-glioma or normal images (5 articles). Single institution datasets were most common (5 articles) followed by BRATS (3 articles). The median sample size was 280 patients. Algorithm testing strategies consisted of five-fold cross validation (5 articles), and the use of exclusive sets of images within the same dataset for training and for testing (7 articles). Neural networks were the most common type of algorithm (10 articles). The accuracy of algorithms ranged from 0.75 to 1.00 (median 0.96, 10 articles). Quality of reporting assessment utilizing TRIPOD criteria yielded a mean individual TRIPOD ratio of 0.50 (standard deviation 0.14, range 0.37 to 0.85).ConclusionSystematic review investigating the identification of gliomas in datasets which include non-glioma images demonstrated multiple limitations hindering the application of these algorithms to clinical practice. These included limited datasets, a lack of generalizable algorithm training and testing strategies, and poor quality of reporting. The development of more robust and heterogeneous datasets is needed for algorithm development. Future studies would benefit from using external datasets for algorithm testing as well as placing increased attention on quality of reporting standards.Systematic Review Registrationwww.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020209938, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020209938).</p

Flow of patients to categorization of acute vascular abnormality on CTA and subsequent temporal separation of cases into a training and validation cohort.

Flow of patients to categorization of acute vascular abnormality on CTA and subsequent temporal separation of cases into a training and validation cohort.</p

S1 File -

BackgroundPatients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dizziness may be imaged via CTA head and neck to detect acute vascular pathology including large vessel occlusion. We identify commonly documented clinical variables which could delineate dizzy patients with near zero risk of acute vascular abnormality on CTA.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of adult ED encounters with chief complaint of dizziness and CTA head and neck imaging at three EDs between 1/1/2014-12/31/2017. A decision rule was derived to exclude acute vascular pathology tested on a separate validation cohort; sensitivity analysis was performed using dizzy “stroke code” presentations.ResultsTesting, validation, and sensitivity analysis cohorts were composed of 1072, 357, and 81 cases with 41, 6, and 12 instances of acute vascular pathology respectively. The decision rule had the following features: no past medical history of stroke, arterial dissection, or transient ischemic attack (including unexplained aphasia, incoordination, or ataxia); no history of coronary artery disease, diabetes, migraines, current/long-term smoker, and current/long-term anti-coagulation or anti-platelet medication use. In the derivation phase, the rule had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 0.91–1.00), specificity of 59% (95% CI: 0.56–0.62), and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 0.99–1.00). In the validation phase, the rule had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 0.61–1.00), specificity of 53% (95% CI: 0.48–0.58), and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 0.98–1.00). The rule performed similarly on dizzy stroke codes and was more sensitive/predictive than all NIHSS cut-offs. CTAs for dizziness might be avoidable in 52% (95% CI: 0.47–0.57) of cases.ConclusionsA collection of clinical factors may be able to “exclude” acute vascular pathology in up to half of patients imaged by CTA for dizziness. These findings require further development and prospective validation, though could improve the evaluation of dizzy patients in the ED.</div

DataSheet_1_Trends in Development of Novel Machine Learning Methods for the Identification of Gliomas in Datasets That Include Non-Glioma Images: A Systematic Review.docx

PurposeMachine learning has been applied to the diagnostic imaging of gliomas to augment classification, prognostication, segmentation, and treatment planning. A systematic literature review was performed to identify how machine learning has been applied to identify gliomas in datasets which include non-glioma images thereby simulating normal clinical practice.Materials and MethodsFour databases were searched by a medical librarian and confirmed by a second librarian for all articles published prior to February 1, 2021: Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science-Core Collection. The search strategy included both keywords and controlled vocabulary combining the terms for: artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, radiomics, magnetic resonance imaging, glioma, as well as related terms. The review was conducted in stepwise fashion with abstract screening, full text screening, and data extraction. Quality of reporting was assessed using TRIPOD criteria.ResultsA total of 11,727 candidate articles were identified, of which 12 articles were included in the final analysis. Studies investigated the differentiation of normal from abnormal images in datasets which include gliomas (7 articles) and the differentiation of glioma images from non-glioma or normal images (5 articles). Single institution datasets were most common (5 articles) followed by BRATS (3 articles). The median sample size was 280 patients. Algorithm testing strategies consisted of five-fold cross validation (5 articles), and the use of exclusive sets of images within the same dataset for training and for testing (7 articles). Neural networks were the most common type of algorithm (10 articles). The accuracy of algorithms ranged from 0.75 to 1.00 (median 0.96, 10 articles). Quality of reporting assessment utilizing TRIPOD criteria yielded a mean individual TRIPOD ratio of 0.50 (standard deviation 0.14, range 0.37 to 0.85).ConclusionSystematic review investigating the identification of gliomas in datasets which include non-glioma images demonstrated multiple limitations hindering the application of these algorithms to clinical practice. These included limited datasets, a lack of generalizable algorithm training and testing strategies, and poor quality of reporting. The development of more robust and heterogeneous datasets is needed for algorithm development. Future studies would benefit from using external datasets for algorithm testing as well as placing increased attention on quality of reporting standards.Systematic Review Registrationwww.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020209938, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020209938).</p

Data_Sheet_1_Population level multimodal neuroimaging correlates of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder among children.docx

ObjectivesLeveraging a large population-level morphologic, microstructural, and functional neuroimaging dataset, we aimed to elucidate the underlying neurobiology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children. In addition, we evaluated the applicability of machine learning classifiers to predict ADHD diagnosis based on imaging and clinical information.MethodsFrom the Adolescents Behavior Cognitive Development (ABCD) database, we included 1,798 children with ADHD diagnosis and 6,007 without ADHD. In multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age and sex, we examined the association of ADHD with different neuroimaging metrics. The neuroimaging metrics included fractional anisotropy (FA), neurite density (ND), mean-(MD), radial-(RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) of white matter (WM) tracts, cortical region thickness and surface areas from T1-MPRAGE series, and functional network connectivity correlations from resting-state fMRI.ResultsChildren with ADHD showed markers of pervasive reduced microstructural integrity in white matter (WM) with diminished neural density and fiber-tracks volumes – most notable in the frontal and parietal lobes. In addition, ADHD diagnosis was associated with reduced cortical volume and surface area, especially in the temporal and frontal regions. In functional MRI studies, ADHD children had reduced connectivity among default-mode network and the central and dorsal attention networks, which are implicated in concentration and attention function. The best performing combination of feature selection and machine learning classifier could achieve a receiver operating characteristics area under curve of 0.613 (95% confidence interval = 0.580–0.645) to predict ADHD diagnosis in independent validation, using a combination of multimodal imaging metrics and clinical variables.ConclusionOur study highlights the neurobiological implication of frontal lobe cortex and associate WM tracts in pathogenesis of childhood ADHD. We also demonstrated possible potentials and limitations of machine learning models to assist with ADHD diagnosis in a general population cohort based on multimodal neuroimaging metrics.</p