Muslimani na slovenskom prostoru do raspada Habsburške Monarhije uz poseban osvrt na njihovo pokrštavanje u ranom novom vijeku

Die Slowenen sind das einzige südslawische Volk, das in keinem Teil seines Ansiedlungsgebietes jemals eine Okkupation durch den Osmanischen Staat und eine Einbindung in sein Verwaltungssystem erlebt hat. Obwohl in der Sphäre des Westchristentums und seiner Kultur fest verankert, lebten Slowenen bereits seit dem 15. Jahrhundert in unmittelbarer geografischer Nähe zum Osmanischen Reich mit kompakt siedelnder muslimischer Bevölkerung. Die Anwesenheit von Muslimen im behandelten Raum kann in drei Hauptperioden mit mehreren Unterperioden unterteilt werden. Die erste und längste Periode dauerte von 15. bis zum Ende des 17. Jahrhunderts: Muslime beiderlei Geschlechts waren osmanische Kriegsgefangene, von denen sich einige christianisierten und in slowenischen Raum dauerhaft ansiedelten. Ihre Taufe erreichte ihren Höhepunkt während des Große Türkenkrieg von 1683-1699. Die zweite Periode erstreckt sich über etwas weniger als zwei Jahrhunderte und kann als die „stille Periode“ der mehr oder weniger friedlichen Koexistenz des habsburgischen Imperiums mit dem Osmanischen Staat genannt werden. Die dritte Periode beginnt mit der österreichisch-ungarischen Okkupation von Bosnien und Herzegowina (1878), nach dem wird es einen Prozess der freien Einwanderung von Muslimen in die slowenischen Provinzen ankommen.Slovenci su jedini južnoslavenski narod čiji etnički teritorij nikada ni u jednom dijelu nije bio pod vlašću Osmanskog Carstva. No premda čvrsto usidreni u prostoru zapadnog kršćanstva i njegove kulture, ipak su još od 15. stoljeća bili geografski vrlo blizu prostora na kojem su kompaktno obitavali pripadnici islamske vjere. Nazočnost muslimana na slovenskom prostoru do 1918. može se podijeliti u tri glavna razdoblja. Prvo i ujedno najduže razdoblje traje od 15. do kraja 17. stoljeća: muslimani obaju spolova bili su ratni zarobljenici, od kojih su neki primili kršćanstvo te su se trajno naselili na slovenskom prostoru. Njihovo pokrštavanje doseglo je vrhunac u vrijeme Velikog bečkog rata 1683. – 1699. Drugo razdoblje proteže se kroz nešto manje od dvaju stoljeća, a moglo bi se nazvati dobom relativno mirne koegzistencije Habsburškog s Osmanskim Carstvom. Treće razdoblje započinje austrougarskom okupacijom Bosne i Hercegovine (1878), nakon kojega će doći do procesa slobodnog useljavanja muslimana u slovenske pokrajine

Ulinka Rublack (Ed.), Protestant Empires. Globalizing the Reformations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2020

Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers (De Gruyter) frei zugänglich.Peer Reviewe

Alles getürkt : 500 Jahre (Vor)Urteile der Deutschen über die Türken

Seit dem Sommer 1992 ist es offensichtlich und unübersehbar: der latente Rassismus, die Ausländer- und Fremdenfeindlichkeit in der deutschen Bevölkerung schlägt um in offene Aggression, Totschlag und Mord. Die öffentliche Diskussion, zahlreiche Medien und eine Mehrzahl der politischen Verantwortlichen setzen nicht etwa Strategien dagegen, die den Schutz der Opfer und ein Ende des Terrors zum Ziel haben, sondern planen die Vertreibung zumindest eines Teils der "Fremden" mit vermeintlich sauberen, rechtstaatlichen Methoden. Das vorliegende Buch - im Juli 1991, also kurz vor Beginn der ersten dieser Progrome abgeschlossen, - gibt auf einige Fragen Antwort. Es tut das in indirekter und nicht selten verblüffender Weise am Beispiel der Beziehung zwischen Deutschen und Türken. - Germany, image of Turkey, prejudice, history 1500-199

Entangled Knowledge

The intimate relationship between global European expansion since the early modern period and the concurrent beginnings of the scientific revolution has long been acknowledged. The contributions in this volume approach the entanglement of science and cultural encounters – many of them in colonial settings – from a variety of perspectives. Historical and historiographical survey essays sketch a transcultural history of knowledge and conduct a critical dialogue between the recent academic fields of Postcolonial Studies and Science & Empire Studies; a series of case studies explores the topos of Europe’s ‘great inventions’, the scientific exploitation of culturally unfamiliar people and objects, the representation of indigenous cultures in discourses of geographical exploration, as well as non-European scientific practices. ‘Entangled Knowledges’ also refers to the critical practices of scholarship: various essays investigate scholarship’s own failures in self-reflexivity, arising from an uncritical appropriation of cultural stereotypes and colonial myths, of which the discourse of Orientalism in historiography and residual racialist assumptions in modern genetics serve as examples. The volume thus contributes to the study of cultural and colonial relations as well as to the history of science and scholarship

Entangled Knowledge

The intimate relationship between global European expansion since the early modern period and the concurrent beginnings of the scientific revolution has long been acknowledged. The contributions in this volume approach the entanglement of science and cultural encounters – many of them in colonial settings – from a variety of perspectives. Historical and historiographical survey essays sketch a transcultural history of knowledge and conduct a critical dialogue between the recent academic fields of Postcolonial Studies and Science & Empire Studies; a series of case studies explores the topos of Europe’s ‘great inventions’, the scientific exploitation of culturally unfamiliar people and objects, the representation of indigenous cultures in discourses of geographical exploration, as well as non-European scientific practices. ‘Entangled Knowledges’ also refers to the critical practices of scholarship: various essays investigate scholarship’s own failures in self-reflexivity, arising from an uncritical appropriation of cultural stereotypes and colonial myths, of which the discourse of Orientalism in historiography and residual racialist assumptions in modern genetics serve as examples. The volume thus contributes to the study of cultural and colonial relations as well as to the history of science and scholarship

Confessionalization and/as Knowledge Transfer in the Greek Orthodox Church

This volume examines the potential of the confessionalization concept for the purposes of a history of knowledge regarding the clerical milieus of the early modern Greek Orthodox Church. Its point of departure is an understanding of confessionalization processes as an epistemic challenge that opened up a field of inter-confessional communication. On the one hand, communication born out of this epistemic challenge – and Orthodoxy’s need to articulate novel, authoritative positions in order to respond – resulted in epistemic movements that shaped confessional boundaries, intellectual profiles and academic curricula. In this sense, confessionalization functioned as knowledge transfer. On the other hand, confessionalization may be perceived as the very context of an unfolding communication process that triggered knowledge mobility in a wide range of epistemic fields, beyond the strictly theological: confessionalization and knowledge transfer. The volume comprises studies on conflict, negotiation and modification of knowledge, on interpersonal networks and networks of books, on genres and discourses in motion, on materialities and medialities of knowledge transfer, on accommodation strategies and institution-building processes in the Greek Orthodox Church, and, last but not least, on fluent confessional identities and trans-confessional discourses in clerical milieus