3,937,776 research outputs found
GROWING UP IN IRELAND KEY FINDINGS: COHORT ’98 AT 20 YEARS OLD IN 2018/19. NO. 1 BEING 20 YEARS OLD
This Key Findings report presents summary information
on the lives and circumstances of the 20-year-olds from
the fourth wave of interviews with Growing Up in Ireland’s
older Cohort ’98 between August 2018 and June 2019.
It focuses on where they live; their main activity as regards
work, education or training; their financial situation; their
engagement with the wider world (including voluntary
activity and political activity); their aspirations for the
future; and whether they have had any contact with the
Gardaà or the courts
GROWING UP IN IRELAND KEY FINDINGS: COHORT ’98 AT 20 YEARS OLD IN 2018/19 NO. 4 EDUCATION, TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT
This Key Findings report presents summary information
on the lives and circumstances of the 20-year-olds from
the fourth wave of interviews with Growing Up in Ireland’s
older Cohort ’98 between August 2018 and June 2019.
It focuses on young adults’ achievements at the end of
second-level education, the profile of those who left
school before the Leaving Certificate and the reasons
for their departure. The report looks at participation in
post-school education and training, how students funded
their education/training and the extent of direct and indirect
support from their parents. Finally, it examines whether the
jobs held by 20-year-olds are stop-gaps or a step on the
career ladder, and the kinds of qualities they value in jobs
Gauging Portuguese community pharmacy users' perceptions
Objective: To assess perceptions related to facets of community pharmacy usage within the Portuguese general population. Methods: An ONSA (The Governmental Public Health Observatory) instrument was used, the ECOS (Em Casa Observamos Saúde) sample. This consisted of a national representative sample of household units with telephone. General demographics and pharmacy users’ perceptions related to five facets of community pharmacy usage were collected by telephone interviews. Main Results: Almost one-third (31.9%) of the participants were probable chronic drug users, hence in regular contact with the community pharmacy. Thirty-four percent preferred not to talk with the person who dispenses their prescribed drugs. Most users (47.6%) expressed opinions of pharmacists as being health care rather than business oriented, although one quarter of the sample was not sure. A large majority (73.7%) would like pharmacists to participate in their treatment decisions, but 55.1% did not seem able to distinguish between pharmacists and non-pharmacist technical staff, working at the pharmacy counter. Most significant predictors of users’ dichotomous perceptions related to the usage facets surveyed were age, education and occupation. Being older, less literate and economically inactive increased the odds of inappropriate users’ perceptions of the pharmacists. Conclusions: Results showed that erroneous concepts and behaviours exist within the Portuguese population in relation to the community pharmacists’ role. This is a matter for pharmacy professional and educational bodies to take into account when developing intervention strategies, in particular when communicating with the general public
Urgent care out of hours: A comparison of the experiences of older people and parents of young children in a semi-rural area
Older people and parents of young children are the most frequent users of out of hours care. However, their needs and expectations of care may be different. The aim of this study was to explore and compare the experiences and views of these two groups following the transfer of responsibility for out of hours services from General Practitioners (GPs) to a Primary Care Trust (PCT). Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews with 19 informants living in a geographically large, semi-rural PCT area in England served by 15 GP practices. Interviews were taped, transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework. Older people presented with more complex health problems than young children, and expressed more reluctance at calling the service. Both groups experienced similar access problems for using the primary care centre (PCC). Older people reported fewer difficulties obtaining a home visit, though experienced continuity problems when illness episodes lasted longer than one shift. Both groups questioned the ability of a doctor to diagnose accurately using only telephone assessment. Despite differences in presenting symptoms and attitudes to service use, older people and parents with young children experienced similar problems in accessing care at the PCC. Older people more frequently received home visits than parents with young children, and it may be that social context is not sufficiently taken into account when assessing need for a home visit. Practitioners should be aware that older people tend to minimise symptoms and should be cautious of relying on lay interpretations of illness when carrying out telephone assessments with this group. © 2007, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved
- …