AT innovation ecosystem design – a kenyan case study

Innovations within the AT space frequently fail to get to market and therefore to the people who could benefit from the products. The Scoping Report which underpins the AT2030 programme identified the need to test and develop “what works” for AT innovation to ensure new products, services and approaches are able to scale and reach people, especially people living in low- and middle-income countries. This paper sets out the initial thinking for an East Africa Innovation Ecosystem. We present the emerging thinking from initial scoping exercises and product trials which have helped to shape the newly launched Innovate Now ecosystem. We outline the ecosystem including the core elements – the accelerator programmes and Live Labs. Live labs will allow for rapid innovation testing and user feedback. Thus, increasing user-involvement in the design and development process, and reducing the time to market. The Innovate Now ecosystem is growing and is being led by AMREF. Successful graduates of innovate Now will be connected into the Innovation Scale Fund which will be launched by AT2030 next year (2020)

Consolidation and Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Role of Mergers and Acquisitions in the Current Innovation Ecosystem

Recent changes in the pharmaceutical industry have spurred an unprecedented wave of mergers and acquisitions. Some researchers and agencies have questioned whether pharmaceutical consolidation could impede drug innovation. However, as I explain in this Article, these concerns are largely based on an outdated understanding of the drug innovation ecosystem. Whereas a few decades ago almost all drug discovery took place inside traditional pharmaceutical companies, today most drug innovation is externally-sourced from biotech companies and smaller firms. Internal R&D is no longer the primary source, or even an important source, of drug innovation. As a result, analyses that focus on the impacts of pharmaceutical consolidation on internal drug innovation are incomplete and missing the point. Instead, merger analyses should examine whether consolidation increases demand for externally-sourced innovation and, ultimately, strengthens aggregate drug innovation

Core Firm Based View on the Mechanism of Constructing an Enterprise Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Haier Group

The fierce competitive status of the business world has urged innovation activities to transform from mechanistic to ecological and organic. An innovation ecosystem consists of multilateral organizations and emerges as a favorable mechanism for value co-creation and sustainable growth. Yet the theorizing of an innovation ecosystem is still at an early stage and in-depth studies from emerging economy leaders are insufficient. This study aims to investigate how an innovation ecosystem is constructed and coordinated from a core-firm based view. An exploratory single case study on the Haier Group is adopted. Through analyzing the multi-bedded units (i.e., six innovation projects/technological breakthroughs), we extract and depict Haier’s innovation ecosystem and the ecological niches within it. We highlight an innovation ecosystem that promotes sustainable development and is based on complementarities in technologies and resources, while at the same time integrates non-technological issues such as strategy, culture, institution, and the market. Regarding ecosystem coordination, value appropriability should be ensured to sustain the innovation ecosystem. Moreover, we argue that the ultimate purpose of innovation ecosystem is not to facilitate the realization of one specific project, but rather to improve the overall success rate of innovations within it. This research complements and extends literature on enterprise innovation ecosystems, and provides implications as to the construction, coordination, and sustainability of innovation ecosystems for emerging economy firms

Research on Innovation Ecosystem of the Crowd Innovation Space Based on System Dynamics

The crowd innovation space is a new innovation business service platform, developed from the traditional incubator, including makerspace, entrepreneurship café and so on. It is essential for mass entrepreneurship and innovation to get full use of the creativity of the crowed innovation space and explore new impetus in New Economic Norm. Based on the traditional enterprise innovation ecosystem theory, this paper explores the connotation of innovation ecosystem of the crowd innovation space. And then, we use the knowledge to model the innovation ecosystem of the crowd innovation space with system dynamics. Based on the model, we explore the operational mechanism of innovation ecosystem of the crowd innovation space. Through the analysis of the operational mechanism and connotation, we put forward to some proposal to improve the effectiveness of the service ability in innovation of the crowd innovation space

The Linkage between Input and Output in the Innovation Ecosystem

An innovation ecosystem is characterized by numerous interactions between its various components The proper functioning of an innovation ecosystem is a necessary condition to increase the chances of successful innovative activities This research aims to investigate the relationship between input and output in the innovation ecosystem of countries For the empirical evaluation the Global Innovation Index GII was used as a proxy of the innovation ecosystem This index tracks innovation inputs and innovation products in various countries Using annual country data an unconditional quantile regression model was estimated to identify the structural relationship between innovation input and output including with lag application Our findings show that innovation input has a significant and positive effect on innovation output in countries These findings are useful for national innovation policies since they emphasize the need to promote better innovation incentive

The Evolution of the Theory of Innovation Ecosystems in the Context of Strategisation

Introduction. The theory of innovation occupies one of the leading positions within the modern paradigm of economic development, as innovation is recognised as a driver of productivity improvement and cost optimisation, microeconomic stability, and macroeconomic growth. The determinants of innovation theory have become more profound, forming a synthesis with theories of economic cycles, technological development, entrepreneurship, management, and decision-making. Consequently, the theory of innovation has evolved, and the study of this process provides an up-to-date view of the theoretical foundation of innovation ecosystems. Aim and tasks. The aim is to systematise the stages of the evolution of the theory of innovation and strategic management and formalise the theoretical foundation of the modern theory of innovation ecosystems in the context of strategisation. Results. A systematic study of the genesis and ontogenesis of the theory of innovation and anagenesis of the theory of innovation ecosystem in the context of strategisation led to the determination of the characteristics of aromorphosis. Genesis and ontogenesis include the growing complexity of the innovation ecosystem and its adaptability to the changing innovation ecosystem in the long term, the dynamism of the composition of the innovation ecosystem without changing its strategic goals, the need for a second level of adaptation of the strategy of an individual actor within the strategy of the innovation ecosystem and strategic role, and increasing the integration of actors of the innovation process into systemic business processes (planning, organisation, motivation, control). Actors’ joint development within the ecosystem on mutually beneficial terms and possibilities for the strategic expansion of the innovation ecosystem locally and globally were analysed.  In addition, the externalities of the development and spread of innovative ecosystems are outlined, and their strategic orientations are formulated. Conclusions. Due to anagenesis, an innovative ecosystem based on strategising improves adaptive resistance to changes in the external environment. Aromorphosis of an innovative ecosystem within anagenesis makes it possible to consider the properties of adaptation to the changing innovative ecotope as the basis of its theoretical foundation in the long term, the dynamism of the composition of the innovation ecosystem without changing its strategic goals, and the increasing integration of innovation process actors into systemic business processes

Open innovation ecosystems

Defined as a community of hierarchically independent, yet interdependent heterogeneous actors around a focal firm who facilitate innovation through cross-boundary knowledge flows, the open innovation ecosystem extends scholarly understanding of open innovation. In particular, the open innovation ecosystem broadens the scope of inquiry over knowledge flows from inside-in, inside-out, coupled, and outside-in modes of open innovation to include an outside-out mode. In doing so, open innovation ecosystem extends the literature on innovation ecosystems more generally, as well as providing a powerful new analytical perspective for open innovation scholars.Pre-prin

The Next Paradigm Shift in the Mobile Ecosystem: Mobile Social Computing and the Increasing Relevance of Users

Social computing has become the paradigm for the increasingly relevant role of users in the Internet world. In this paper, it is argued that mobile social computing will eventually cause an even bigger impact in the mobile ecosystem. We are already at the beginning of the "transference" of a significant part of Internet social computing usage to the mobile domain, where users are no longer passive consumers of content andapplications, but co-creators and even innovators of them. However, mobile social computing will go one step further in the contribution to the development of the mobile ecosystem, since it will put the many situations of users' daily activities at the centre stage. To prove this case, this paper gathers available data and evidence on the patterns of mobile social computing usage and discusses user innovation and user empowerment in the framework of the current mobile ecosystem.Mobile social computing, user innovation, mobile ecosystem.