Effect of gravity on halogenated hydrocarbon flame retardant effectiveness

Flammability limits, burning velocities, and minimum ignition energies under initially quiescent conditions were measured for stoichiometric and fuel-lean methane-, ethane-, and propane-air mixtures containing varying concentrations of Halon 1301. The characteristics of near-limit flames were strongly affected by fuel type but not Halon concentration. The conclusions were that the mechanism of the flammability limits was affected by fuel type but not Halon concentration, that the zero-g flammability limit is probably related to a stability criterion which is affected mostly by the molecular diffusion characteristics of the reactant gases and is mostly independent of chemical kinetics, and that the one-g upward flammability and ignition limits provide adequate criteria for safety at one-g and zero-g for both uninhibited and inhibited mixtures

Flammability limits of alternative aviation fuels

Alternative aviation fuels are being developed recently to partially replace the limited resources of traditional liquid fuels in the aviation industry. The fire-safety properties of these fuels, however, are unknown. Especially, the flammability limit of a fuel is a crucial parameter. The present work focuses on measurements of concentration and temperature flammability limits of four pure hydrocarbon fuels, as well as traditional and alternative aviation fuels, including Jet-A, HEFA, SIP, and FT-S8. The lower and upper concentration flammability limits of these selected fuels were determined under specific temperatures and pressures. An experiment including a customized power supply system to generate sufficient spark energy for ignition near the flammability limits was built to measure the lower and upper limits. The temperature flammability limits were also measured using a different experimental apparatus for the four selected aviation fuels. As the initial temperature increases, the lower concentration flammability limit decreases. In terms of the fuel-air mass ratio, the limit is within the range of 0.032-0.04 for all four aviation fuels. The upper flammability limit increases with temperature within a range of 0.21-0.23 except for SIP. Unlike temperature, pressure has minor influence on the lower concentration flammability limit for all fuels. Among the four aviation fuels, Jet-A and HEFA have similar results, and FT-S8 is considered to be least sensitive with temperature variation. Three correlations and models were used to predict the lower concentration flammability limits of the four pure fuels. The predictions were compared to the measurements. As for temperature flammability limits, SIP has the highest lower temperature flammability limit. From this perspective, SIP can be considered a better choice for alternative aviation fuels for safer storage and transportation during ground operations. HEFA has similar results as Jet-A, while FT-S8 has smaller lower temperature flammability limit than Jet-A and HEFA

Jet A Explosion Experiments: Laboratory Testing

This report describes a series of experiments and analyses on the flammability of Jet A (aviation kerosene) in air. This is a progress report on ongoing work. The emphasis so far has been on measuring basic explosion parameters as a function of fuel amount and temperature. These parameters include vapor pressure, flammability limits, peak explosion pressure and pressure as a function of time during the explosion. These measurements were undertaken in order to clear up some fundamental issues with the existing data. The report is organized as follows: First, we give some background with data from previous studies and discuss the fuel weathering issues. Second, we describe the facility used to do combustion experiments, the combustion test procedures and the results of the combustion experiments. Third, we give estimates of peak pressure, review the standard analysis of pressure histories and discuss the application to the present data. Fourth, we review the standard approach to flammability limits and the issues in determining Jet A flammability. Fifth, we discuss the problems associated with measuring vapor pressure and describe our results for Jet A. Sixth, we present a model for Jet A which illustrates the issues in analyzing multicomponent fuels. Finally, we apply these results to TWA 800 and summarize our conclusions to date

Flammability Characteristics of Light Hydrocarbons and Their Mixtures at Elevated Conditions

Accurate data of flammability limits for flammable gases and vapors are needed to prevent fires and explosions. The flammability limit is the maximum or minimum fuel concentration at which a gas mixture is flammable in a given atmosphere. Even though investigations of flammability limit have been carried out for decades, data are still scarce and sometimes unavailable. Through years of study, people have developed estimation and approximation methods for the prediction of flammability limit. However, these methods exhibit significant variations, especially at elevated temperatures and pressures. This research focuses on the flammability limits of light hydrocarbons (methane, propane, and ethylene) and their binary mixtures at normal and elevated conditions. The flammability limits of pure light hydrocarbons, and binary mixtures were determined experimentally at the temperature up to 300ºC and initial pressure up to 2atm. The experiments were conducted in a closed cylindrical stainless steel vessel with upward flame propagation. The combustion behavior and different flammability criteria were compared and the 7% pressure increment was determined as the most appropriate criterion for the test. Experimentally measured pure hydrocarbon flammability limits are compared with existing data in the literature to study the influence of temperature, pressure, and apparatus set. An estimation model was developed for the prediction of pure light hydrocarbon flammability limit at elevated conditions. For binary mixtures, experiment data were compared with predictions from Le Chatelier’s Rule to validate its application at elevated conditions. It was discovered that Le Chatelier’s rule works fairly well for the lower flammability limit of mixtures only. The explanation of the difference between upper flammability limit predictions with experimental data was investigated through the reaction pathway analysis using ANSYS CHEMKIN software. It was proved that for the upper flammability limit test, ethylene was more reactive than methane and propane in the combustion process. Finally, a modified Le Chatelier’s rule model was developed and validated using experimental data

Flammability limits, ignition energy, and flame speeds in H₂–CH₄–NH₃–N₂O–O₂–N₂ mixtures

Experiments on flammability limits, ignition energies, and flame speeds were carried out in a 11.25- and a 400-liter combustion vessel at initial pressures and temperatures of 100 kPa and 295 K, respectively. Flammability maps of hydrogen–nitrous oxide–nitrogen, methane–nitrous oxide–nitrogen, ammonia–nitrous oxide–nitrogen, and ammonia–nitrous oxide–air, as well as lean flammability limits of various hydrogen–methane–ammonia–nitrous oxide–oxygen–nitrogen mixtures were determined. Ignition energy bounds of methane–nitrous oxide, ammonia–nitrous oxide, and ammonia–nitrous oxide–nitrogen mixtures have been determined and the influence of small amounts of oxygen on the flammability of methane–nitrous oxide–nitrogen mixtures has been investigated. Flame speeds have been measured and laminar burning velocities have been determined for ammonia–air–nitrous oxide and various hydrogen–methane–ammonia–nitrous oxide–oxygen–nitrogen mixtures. Lower and upper flammability limits (mixing fan on, turbulent conditions) for ignition energies of 8 J are: H₂–N₂O: 4.5 ∼ 5.0% H₂(LFL), 76 ∼ 80% H₂(UFL); CH₄–N₂O: 2.5 ∼ 3.0% CH₄(LFL), 43 ∼ 50% CH₄(UFL); NH₃–N₂O: 5.0 ∼ 5.2% NH₃(LFL), 67.5 ∼ 68% NH₃(UFL). Inerting concentrations are: H₂–N₂O–N₂: 76% N₂; CH₄–N₂O–N₂: 70.5% N₂; NH₃–N₂O–N₂: 61% N₂; NH₃–N₂O–air: 85% air. Flammability limits of methane–nitrous oxide–nitrogen mixtures show no pronounced dependence on small amounts of oxygen (<5%). Generally speaking, flammable gases with large initial amounts of nitrous oxide or ammonia show a strong dependence of flammability limits on ignition energy

Flammability limits, ignition energy, and flame speeds in H₂–CH₄–NH₃–N₂O–O₂–N₂ mixtures

Experiments on flammability limits, ignition energies, and flame speeds were carried out in a 11.25- and a 400-liter combustion vessel at initial pressures and temperatures of 100 kPa and 295 K, respectively. Flammability maps of hydrogen–nitrous oxide–nitrogen, methane–nitrous oxide–nitrogen, ammonia–nitrous oxide–nitrogen, and ammonia–nitrous oxide–air, as well as lean flammability limits of various hydrogen–methane–ammonia–nitrous oxide–oxygen–nitrogen mixtures were determined. Ignition energy bounds of methane–nitrous oxide, ammonia–nitrous oxide, and ammonia–nitrous oxide–nitrogen mixtures have been determined and the influence of small amounts of oxygen on the flammability of methane–nitrous oxide–nitrogen mixtures has been investigated. Flame speeds have been measured and laminar burning velocities have been determined for ammonia–air–nitrous oxide and various hydrogen–methane–ammonia–nitrous oxide–oxygen–nitrogen mixtures. Lower and upper flammability limits (mixing fan on, turbulent conditions) for ignition energies of 8 J are: H₂–N₂O: 4.5 ∼ 5.0% H₂(LFL), 76 ∼ 80% H₂(UFL); CH₄–N₂O: 2.5 ∼ 3.0% CH₄(LFL), 43 ∼ 50% CH₄(UFL); NH₃–N₂O: 5.0 ∼ 5.2% NH₃(LFL), 67.5 ∼ 68% NH₃(UFL). Inerting concentrations are: H₂–N₂O–N₂: 76% N₂; CH₄–N₂O–N₂: 70.5% N₂; NH₃–N₂O–N₂: 61% N₂; NH₃–N₂O–air: 85% air. Flammability limits of methane–nitrous oxide–nitrogen mixtures show no pronounced dependence on small amounts of oxygen (<5%). Generally speaking, flammable gases with large initial amounts of nitrous oxide or ammonia show a strong dependence of flammability limits on ignition energy

Flammability Limits Study ofVapour Mixtures above Crude Oil at Low Temperatures

Study of fire and explosion is very important mainly in oil and gas industries due to the severity of fire and explosion incidents. Fire and explosion could cause property damage and loss of lives. In this work, investigation had been carried out on the flammability of crude oil at low temperatures 35°C, 40°C and 50°C. Hydrocarbon components derived from refinery storage was assessed. The oil-liquid phase was analyzed using Headspace-Gas Chromatography (HS-GC) and Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) to examine the composition of the sample. Hydrocarbon compounds ranging from C6 to C9 were detected. Lower Flammability Limits (LFLs) and Upper Flammability Limits (UFLs) for individual components were calculated at each temperature using stoichiometric concentration method proposed by Zabetakis et. al. Flammability limits of the mixture, LFLmiX and UFLn^ were calculated using the Le Chatelier equation. Limiting Oxygen Concentration (LOCs) for each temperature are calculated using Hansen and Crowl method, while the estimation ofLOC for the mixtures (LOC„ux) is calculated using Zlowchower and Green method. Flammability diagramwas constructed which is used to determinethe flammability of the mixture at respective temperature. It is found that as the temperature increases, the flammability range of vapours above crude oil increases too. The findings of this studymay assist in minimizing fire hazards associated with presence ofhydrocarbon vapours

MASS LOSS AND FLAMMABILITY OF INSULATION MATERIALS USED IN SANDWICH PANELS DURING THE PRE-FLASHOVER PHASE OF FIRE

In this study, the mass-loss and flammability limits of different sandwich panels and their cores (PUR, PIR, stone wool, EPS and XPS) are studied separately using a special developed furnace. The focus is on the pre-flashover phase of fire (up to 400°C), because exceeding the lower flammability limit in this phase may lead to a smoke layer explosion, a hazardous situation for an offensive intervention by the fire brigade. The research has shown that the actual mass-loss of synthetic and stone wool based cores is comparable up to 300°C. From 300°C onwards, the mass-loss of PUR panels is significant. EPS and XPS cores become fluid before pyrolysis starts. Furthermore delamination of the panels can be observed at exposure to temperatures above 250°C for the synthetic and 350°C for the mineral wool panels. The lower flammability limits have been established experimentally at 39% m/m (PUR) and 36% m/m (PS) of the pyrolysis gasses on the air mass, respectively. For PIR and mineral wool no flammability limits could be established

Oxygen Concentration Flammability Thresholds of Selected Aerospace Materials Considered for the Constellation Program

Materials selection for spacecraft is based on an upward flammability test conducted in a quiescent environment in the highest expected oxygen concentration environment. The test conditions and its pass/fail test logic do not provide sufficient quantitative materials flammability information for an advanced space exploration program. A modified approach has been suggested determination of materials self-extinguishment limits. The flammability threshold information will allow NASA to identify materials with increased flammability risk from oxygen concentration and total pressure changes, minimize potential impacts, and allow for development of sound requirements for new spacecraft and extraterrestrial landers and habitats. This paper provides data on oxygen concentration self-extinguishment limits under quiescent conditions for selected materials considered for the Constellation Program