2,644,063 research outputs found

    Bias Correction of ML and QML Estimators in the EGARCH(1,1) Model

    Get PDF
    n this paper we derive the bias approximations of the Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Quasi-Maximum Likelihood (QML) Estimators of the EGARCH(1,1) parameters and we check our theoretical results through simulations. With the approximate bias expressions up to O(1/T), we are then able to correct the bias of all estimators. To this end, a Monte Carlo exercise is conducted and the results are presented and discussed. We conclude that, for given sets of parameters values, the bias correction works satisfactory for all parameters. The results for the bias expressions can be used in order to formulate the approximate Edgeworth distribution of the estimators.

    Studying top quark decay into the polarized W-boson in the TC2 model

    Full text link
    We study the decay mode of top quark decaying into Wb in the TC2 model where the top quark is distinguished from other fermions by participating in a strong interaction. We find that the TC2 correction to the decay width Γ(tbW)\Gamma (t \to b W) is generally several percent and maximum value can reach 8% for the currently allowed parameters. The magnitude of such correction is comparable with QCD correction and larger than that of minimal supersymmetric model. Such correction might be observable in the future colliders. We also study the TC2 correction to the branching ratio of top quark decay into the polarized W bosons and find the correction is below 1 1 % . After considering the TC2 correction, we find that our theoretical predictions about the decay branching ratio are also consistent with the experimental data.Comment: 8 pages, 4 figure

    Tracking Quantum Error Correction

    Get PDF
    To implement fault-tolerant quantum computation with continuous variables, the Gottesman--Kitaev--Preskill (GKP) qubit has been recognized as an important technological element. We have proposed a method to reduce the required squeezing level to realize large scale quantum computation with the GKP qubit [Phys. Rev. X. {\bf 8}, 021054 (2018)], harnessing the virtue of analog information in the GKP qubits. In the present work, to reduce the number of qubits required for large scale quantum computation, we propose the tracking quantum error correction, where the logical-qubit level quantum error correction is partially substituted by the single-qubit level quantum error correction. In the proposed method, the analog quantum error correction is utilized to make the performances of the single-qubit level quantum error correction almost identical to those of the logical-qubit level quantum error correction in a practical noise level. The numerical results show that the proposed tracking quantum error correction reduces the number of qubits during a quantum error correction process by the reduction rate {2(n1)×4l1n+1}/(2n×4l1)\left\{{2(n-1)\times4^{l-1}-n+1}\right\}/({2n \times 4^{l-1}}) for nn-cycles of the quantum error correction process using the Knill's C4/C6C_{4}/C_{6} code with the concatenation level ll. Hence, the proposed tracking quantum error correction has great advantage in reducing the required number of physical qubits, and will open a new way to bring up advantage of the GKP qubits in practical quantum computation

    A Unified and Generalized Approach to Quantum Error Correction

    Full text link
    We present a unified approach to quantum error correction, called operator quantum error correction. This scheme relies on a generalized notion of noiseless subsystems that is not restricted to the commutant of the interaction algebra. We arrive at the unified approach, which incorporates the known techniques -- i.e. the standard error correction model, the method of decoherence-free subspaces, and the noiseless subsystem method -- as special cases, by combining active error correction with this generalized noiseless subsystem method. Moreover, we demonstrate that the quantum error correction condition from the standard model is a necessary condition for all known methods of quantum error correction.Comment: 5 page

    Towards a More User-friendly Correction

    Full text link
    We first present our view of detection and correction of syntactic errors. We then introduce a new correction method, based on heuristic criteria used to decide which correction should be preferred. Weighting of these criteria leads to a flexible and parametrable system, which can adapt itself to the user. A partitioning of the trees based on linguistic criteria: agreement rules, rather than computational criteria is then necessary. We end by proposing extensions to lexical correction and to some syntactic errors. Our aim is an adaptable and user-friendly system capable of automatic correction for some applications.Comment: Postscript file, compressed and uuencoded, 6 pages, published at CoLing'94, Kyoto, Japan, August 9

    Spin-wave-induced correction to the conductivity of ferromagnets

    Get PDF
    We calculate the correction to the conductivity of a disordered ferromagnetic metal due to spin-wave-mediated electron--electron interactions. This correction is the generalization of the Altshuler-Aronov correction to spin-wave-mediated interactions. We derive a general expression for the conductivity correction to lowest order in the spin-wave-mediated interaction and for the limit that the exchange splitting Δ\Delta is much smaller than the Fermi energy. For a "clean" ferromagnet with Δτel/1\Delta\tau_{\rm el}/\hbar \gg 1, with τel\tau_{\rm el} the mean time for impurity scattering, we find a correction δσT5/2\delta \sigma \propto -T^{5/2} at temperatures TT above the spin wave gap. In the opposite, "dirty" limit, Δτel/1\Delta\tau_{\rm el}/\hbar \ll 1, the correction is a non-monotonous function of temperature.Comment: 9 pages, 6 figure
    corecore