Life cycle assessment of bacterial cellulose and comparison to other cellulosic sources

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a 3D exopolysaccharide synthesized by certain acetic acid bacteria, possessing unique properties such as nanofibrillar morphology and high purity. BC has gained increasing attention for several potential market applications, including in textiles. However, along with techno-economic challenges, the industrialization of BC pulp must align with sustainable practices and minimize the environmental impact. To date, a comparative environmental assessment of BC pulp against plant-based celluloses (e.g. wood pulp or nanocellulose (NC)) or of BC-lyocell against cotton or man-made cellulose fibers (e.g. viscose and lyocell) has not been reported. In this study, both BC pulp and BC-lyocell production were modelled for life cycle assessment (LCA). For BC pulp, the results were compared with nanocelluloses, using different life cycle impact assessment methods. For BC-lyocell, the results were compared with cotton, viscose, and lyocell fibres, using information available from the literature. The major contributors to the environmental impact of both the BC pulp and BC-lyocell were the preparation of the culture medium, followed by cellulose washing and energy consumption. The BC pulp showed lower environmental impacts than NCs. BC-Lyocell exhibited a larger environmental impact than cotton, viscose, and lyocell in most of the environmental categories, except for land use and water depletion. Following a comprehensive impact and sensitivity analysis, several measures were identified to enhance the environmental performance of BC, such as exploring by-products for culture medium preparation and optimizing the use of chemicals (NaOH) and energy.This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the strategic funding of BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte and by the integrated project be@t – Textile Bioeconomy (TC-C12-i01, Sustainable Bioeconomy No. 02/C12-0i1/2022), promoted by the Recovery and Resilience Plan (RRP), Next Generation EU, for the period 2021–2026. The authors also acknowledge the financial support of the FCT (ESF) through the grant given to Francisco A.G.S. Silva (SFRH/BD/146375/2019). This work was also supported by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC): LEPABE, UIDB/00511/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/UIDB/00511/2020) and UIDP/00511/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/UIDP/00511/2020) and ALiCE, LA/P/0045/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/LA/P/0045/2020).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio