A No-Go Theorem for psi-ontic Models? No, Surely Not!

Abstract

In a recent reply to my criticisms (Found Phys 55:5, 2025), Carcassi, Oldofredi and Aidala admitted that their no-go result for psi-ontic models is based on the implicit assumption that all states are equally distinguishable, but insisted that this assumption is a part of the psi-ontic models defined by Harrigan and Spekkens, and thus their result is still valid. In this note, I refute their argument again

Similar works

This paper was published in PhilSci Archive.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.