Adopting sustainable agricultural practices requires effective knowledge mobilization of research
to growers to inform their decision-making. Grape growers are increasingly facing widespread
viral outbreaks, causing reduced quality and quantities of grapes. Growers affected by grapevine
viruses are recommended to adopt integrated pest management practices, which are complex and
require substantial knowledge. Understanding how to mobilize knowledge effectively is critical
to the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices; however, getting research to growers is
challenging. To better understand the role of knowledge mobilization in adopting integrated pest
management for grapevine viruses, a case study of the grape and wine region of Niagara,
Ontario, was conducted. Study One aimed to synthesize the knowledge produced on grapevine
viruses in Canada and the United States by conducting a scoping review. Eligible articles were
collated and thematically analyzed to comprehensively review the literature and identify key
themes. Seven themes emerged: the field of grapevine virus research is growing, research foci
are shifting and responsive, knowledge of grapevine leafroll-associated viruses and future
research needs, knowledge of grapevine red blotch virus and future research needs, research
needs of other major viruses, primary virus management foci, and primary vector management
foci. Study Two aimed to identify factors facilitating and hindering the flow of knowledge using
interviews and observations of primary actors and knowledge mobilization events in the Niagara
region. Data was thematically analyzed, resulting in six key themes: connectivity, intermediaries,
and tailoring knowledge mobilization to growers’ needs facilitate knowledge mobilization, and
lack of localized and practical knowledge, limited support and resources, and misalignments
among actors hinder knowledge mobilization. Study One offers a valuable educational resource
to understand what is known about grapevine viruses and where future research efforts are
required while making the research more accessible to researchers, intermediaries, and growers.
Study Two informs future agricultural knowledge mobilization efforts and provides scholarly
input on the factors influencing knowledge flow. Together, these studies enhance Nguyen et al.’s
(2017) knowledge-action framework, elaborating on existing factors and identifying additional
factors influencing knowledge mobilization
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.