Repository landing page

We are not able to resolve this OAI Identifier to the repository landing page. If you are the repository manager for this record, please head to the Dashboard and adjust the settings.

An institutional analysis of UK ostensible minority shareholder protection mechanisms

Abstract

This article argues that there is a conundrum at the heart of the company law understanding of ostensible minority protection mechanisms (the derivative claim and unfair prejudice): they are terrible at protecting those that they are thought to protect. The hurdles to access the remedies are too high, there is undue focus on the behaviour of the wronged party, costs are uncertain, and relief inadequate. This conundrum can be resolved by applying an institutional analysis and exploring the rules from the perspective of the company. Here, a number apparent weaknesses in the regime are mostly strengths for the company. The remedies are important for the company as they act as a ‘lightning rod’: all complaints by disgruntled shareholders are funnelled through these hegemonic argumentation structures, which protect the institutional arrangement of the company and, in turn, that part of the institutional environment which is company law

Similar works

This paper was published in Edinburgh Research Explorer.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.