An assessment of the assisted seismic history matching workflow, practical innovations and solutions

Abstract

In hydrocarbon reservoir monitoring, assisted seismic history matching (ASHM) remains a large and intractable problem. Despite advances in optimisation algorithms, quantification of uncertainty, data quality, data processing, computational resources and general subsurface knowledge, practical implementations of assisted/automated seismic history matching (ASHM) remain boutique and inflexible. Consideration of recent research on ASHM problems highlights a single-minded focus on algorithmic solutions, that ignore the broader perspective of ASHM as a multidisciplinary framework for improving subsurface models. This thesis expands the consideration of ASHM beyond the optimisation, to propose a novel three-phase approach. ASHM is posed as a larger workflow that includes acquiring, evaluating and establishing an ASHM model (Phase 1), history matching (Phase 2) and model evaluation and improvement (Phase 3). By taking a big picture perspective with respect to ASHM, additional value and patterns to workflows emerge that will improve the adoption of ASHM within the subsurface industry, by offering pragmatic and targeted guidance to development, evaluation and improvement around subsurface models via ASHM

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

ROS: The Research Output Service. Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh

redirect
Last time updated on 19/10/2023

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.