Repository landing page

We are not able to resolve this OAI Identifier to the repository landing page. If you are the repository manager for this record, please head to the Dashboard and adjust the settings.

Variance 〈(δ<em>X</em><sub>+</sub>)<sup>2</sup>〉 versus <em>r</em><sub>1</sub> for the fixed collective phase Φ = 0

Abstract

<p><strong>Figure 5.</strong> Variance 〈(δ<em>X</em><sub>+</sub>)<sup>2</sup>〉 versus <em>r</em><sub>1</sub> for the fixed collective phase Φ = 0. The other parameters are <em>q</em> = (0, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 5, 10). (a) <em>s</em> = 0.5, (b) <em>s</em> = 1, (c) <em>s</em> = 2, and (d) <em>s</em> = 5. The curves for <em>q</em> = (1, 5, 10) can hardly be distinguished. The variance drops below the standard quantum limit 1 in a wide range of parameters. This indicates the existence of the two-mode squeezing and entanglement under loose conditions.</p> <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>We show that it is possible to use an atom–cavity reservoir to prepare the two-mode squeezed and entangled states of a hybrid system of an atomic ensemble and an optical field, which do not directly interact with each other. The essential mechanism is based on the combined effect of a two-mode squeezing interaction and a beam–splitter interaction between the system and the reservoir. The reservoir mechanism is important for quantum networking in that it allows an interface between a localized matter-based memory and an optical carrier of quantum information without direct interaction.</p

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

FigShare

redirect
Last time updated on 12/02/2018

This paper was published in FigShare.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.