Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment

By Sue Bloxham and Amanda West


Students need to understand assessment processes in order to succeed in higher education. However, recent research has identified how difficult it is for students to become absorbed into the assessment culture of their disciplines, with a recognition that providing written criteria and grade descriptors is not enough to make this tacit ‘knowledge’ transparent to novice students. This paper reports on an experiment where sports studies students used assessment criteria to mark their peers work coupled with an assessment of their peer marking and feedback comments. The latter was included to encourage students to engage with the peer assessment in some depth. Analysis of the data indicates considerable benefits for the students in terms of use of criteria,\ud awareness of their achievements and ability to understand assessment feedback

Topics: sub_highereducation
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
Year: 2004
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1993). 53 interesting ways to assess your students (3rd edn)
  2. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education doi
  3. (2000). Be more critical!’: rethinking assessment feedback, paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference,
  4. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: the challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching, doi
  5. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes, doi
  6. (2000). Learning about interface design through peer assessment, doi
  7. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education doi
  8. (2003). QUERY DETAILS I have assumed this is Rust et al.
  9. (2000). Student peer assessment. Available online at: (accessed 20
  10. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach, in: doi
  11. (2000). Student writing in higher education (Buckingham,
  12. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd edn) (Buckingham, doi
  13. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning, doi
  14. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in peer assessment, doi
  15. (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self assessment, Assessment and Evaluation doi
  16. (2000). The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self assessment, Assessment and Evaluation doi
  17. (2002). Trying to be motivated: perspectives on learning from younger students accessing higher education, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.