Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Improving subject knowledge and subject pedagogic knowledge in employment based secondary initial teacher training in England

By A. Evans, F. Hawksley, M. R. Holland and I. Caillau

Abstract

<p>Each year in England about 6,000 trainee teachers qualify by undertaking an employment-based initial teacher training route (EBITT), where training is mainly school based. Government inspectors have found that trainees on this route are weaker in subject knowledge and subject pedagogic knowledge compared to trainees following the more traditional one year training course (PGCE) of which about a third of course time is University based. EBITT providers are currently seeking to improve the subject knowledge aspect of training. To support this work the TDA have published a model for developing trainees' subject knowledge for teaching and suggest that providers review their provision against the model. In addition EBITT providers must also meet a new requirement that the total training time should be a minimum of 60 days. This new requirement presents a challenge to EBITT providers as most of the subject knowledge enhancement will have to be school-based. This paper seeks to find out:</p> <p> - how trainee teachers acquire subject and subject pedagogic knowledge while based in a school and</p> <p> - whether teaching staff in schools have the required subject and subject pedagogic knowledge and skills for this enhanced role.</p> <p> Data have been collected from trainees, school-based mentors, school-based Initial Teacher Training Coordinators and University assessors over a one year period. Data about the way trainees acquire subject knowledge was interpreted against the TDA model. The study finds that:</p> <p> - trainees acquire subject and subject pedagogic knowledge in a variety of highly individualistic ways that suggests that the TDA model only partially explains what is happening in practice and</p> <p> - there is a significant training need to ensure schools are well equipped to deliver high quality subject focussed training.</p

Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:shura.shu.ac.uk:187

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1973). A Study of Student Teachers in the Classroom'
  2. (2008). Abell K.(2008) 'Twenty years later; does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?' doi
  3. (2007). Developing Trainees’ Subject Knowledge for Teaching.
  4. (2001). Expert Teaching.
  5. (2001). From Preparation to Practice: Designing a Continuum to Strengthen and Sustain Teaching'.
  6. Grossman P.L.(1990) The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education.
  7. (1999). Individual action planning in Initial Teacher Training: empowerment or discipline.
  8. (2006). Individual Teacher Training: A systematic map into approaches to making initial teacher training flexible and responsive to the needs of trainee teachers.
  9. (1987). Individual, Institutional and Cultural Influences on the Development of Teachers’ Craft Knowledge',
  10. (2003). Knowledge Construction and Learning to Teach. Keynote address for the International Association of Teachers and Teaching Conference.
  11. (2005). Levels in Reflection: Core Reflection as a Mean to Enhance Professional Growth.” Teachers and Teaching,
  12. (1999). Linking Theory and Practice: Changing the Pedagogy of Teacher Education'.
  13. (1993). Pedagogical Content Knowing: An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparation. doi
  14. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: a study in the history of the idea. Teaching and Teacher Education Vol. doi
  15. (2002). Qualifying to Teach: Professional Standards for Qualified Teacher Status and Requirements for Initial Teacher Training.
  16. (1988). Situated Knowledge and Expertise in Teaching'. In
  17. (2003). Stepping stone to success: previously developed career competences and their benefits to career switchers transitioning into teaching.
  18. (1949). The Concept of Mind.
  19. (1970). The Logic of Education.
  20. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.Basic Books, doi
  21. (1964). The structure of the disciplines: meanings and disciplines'
  22. (1986). Those who understand: doi
  23. (2004). What pedagogical practices do teacher educators use in Higher Education based elements of their courses? Protocol for the Learning Theories Review Group. Social Sciences Research Unit,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.