Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Skill mix in the health care workforce : reviewing the evidence

By James Buchan and Mario R Dal Poz

Abstract

This paper discusses the reasons for skill mix among health workers being important for health systems. It examines the evidence base (identifying its limitations), summarizes the main findings from a literature review, and highlights the evidence on skill mix that is available to inform health system managers, health professionals, health policy-makers and other stakeholders. Many published\ud studies are merely descriptive accounts or have methodological weaknesses. With few exceptions, the published analytical studies were undertaken in the USA, and the findings may not be relevant to other health systems. The results from even the most rigorous of studies\ud cannot necessarily be applied to a different setting. This reflects the basis on which skill mix should be examined—identifying the care needs of a specific patient population and using these to determine the required skills of staff. It is therefore not possible to prescribe in detail a ‘‘universal’’ ideal mix of health personnel. With these limitations in mind, the paper examines two main areas in which investigating current evidence can make a significant contribution to a better understanding of skill mix. For the mix of nursing staff, the evidence suggests that increased use of less qualified staff will not be effective in all situations, although in some cases increased use of care assistants has led to greater organizational effectiveness. Evidence on the doctor–nurse\ud overlap indicates that there is unrealized scope in many systems for extending the use of nursing staff. The effectiveness of different skill mixes across other groups of health workers and professions, and the associated issue of developing new roles remain relatively unexplored

Topics: RA
Publisher: World Health Organization
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:92

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). A confusion of roles: manpower in the National Health Service.
  2. (1995). A meta-analysis of nurse practitioners and nurse midwives in primary care. doi
  3. (1998). Advances in hospital outcomes research.
  4. (1990). Alternative caregivers: cost effective utilisation of RNs. Nursing Administration Quarterly doi
  5. Care provided by ’skill mix’ and ’informal care givers’ to critically ill patients.
  6. (1998). Caught in the cross fire of change: nurses’ experience with unlicensed assistive personnel. doi
  7. (1998). Comparing standard care with a physician and pharmacist team approach for uncontrolled hypertension. doi
  8. Controlled trial of pharmacist intervention in general practice: the effect on prescribing costs.
  9. (2000). Determining skill mix in the health workforce: guidelines for managers and health professionals. Geneva: World Health Organization;
  10. (1999). Determining skill mix: lessons from an international review. Human Resources for Health Development Journal
  11. (1999). Doctor-nurse substitution: the workforce equation. doi
  12. (1990). Evaluating an RN/co-worker model. doi
  13. (1999). Health care professional staffing, hospital characteristics, and hospital mortality rates Pharmacotherapy doi
  14. If changing skill mix is the answer, what is the question? doi
  15. (1998). Impact of unlicensed assistive personnel on patient satisfaction: an integrative review of the literature. doi
  16. (1991). Issues related to the use of nurse extenders. doi
  17. Nurse management of patients with minor illnesses in general practice: a multi centre randomised control trial.
  18. (1999). Nurse staffing and patient outcomes: evolution of an international study.
  19. (1998). Nurse staffing levels and adverse events following surgery in U.S. hospitals. doi
  20. (1996). Parents as partners in care. Paediatric Nursing
  21. Primary health care lessons from the northeast of Brazil: the Agentes de Sau´de Program. doi
  22. Randomised control trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. doi
  23. Randomised control trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting same day consultation in primary care. doi
  24. Resource allocation and resident outcomes in nursing homes: comparisons between the best and worst. doi
  25. (1993). Restructuring nursing for a competitive health care environment.
  26. RUG-III and resource allocation: comparing the relationship of direct care time with patient characteristics in five countries. Resource Utilization Groups. Age and Ageing 1997;26. doi
  27. Skill mix between nurses and doctors working in primary care-delegation or allocation: a review of the literature. doi
  28. (1998). Skill mix changes: substitution or service development? Health Policy doi
  29. Studies of nurse practitioner effectiveness. doi
  30. The global distribution of physicians and nurses. doi
  31. (1997). The health care assistant: usurper of nursing? doi
  32. The impact of nursing grade on the quality and outcome of nursing care. doi
  33. (1996). The impact of unlicensed assistive personnel on nursing care delivery.
  34. (1999). The pharmacist’s role in reducing patient delay in seeking treatment for acute myocardial infarction.
  35. (1991). The University Hospital nurse extender program: Part IV. doi
  36. (2000). The World Health Report, doi
  37. (1995). Traditional practitioners as primary health care workers. Geneva: World Health Organization;
  38. (1998). training and job satisfaction of physiotherapy assistants. doi
  39. (1996). Using elderly volunteers to care for the elderly: opportunities for nursing,
  40. WHO estimates of health personnel: physicians, nurses, midwives, dentists and pharmacists (around 1998). Geneva: World Health Organization. Available from: URL: http://www3.who.int/whosis (click on ‘‘heath personnel’’).

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.