Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Understanding student input for tutorial dialogue in procedural domains

By Myroslava Dzikovska, Charles Callaway, Matthew Stone and Johanna D. Moore


We present an analysis of student language\ud input in a corpus of tutoring dialogue\ud in the domain of symbolic differentiation.\ud Our focus on procedural tutoring\ud makes the dialogue comparable to collaborative\ud problem-solving (CPS). Existing\ud CPS models describe the process of\ud negotiating plans and goals, which also\ud fits procedural tutoring. However, we\ud provide a classification of student utterances\ud and corpus annotation which shows\ud that approximately 28% of non-trivial student\ud language in this corpus is not accounted\ud for by existing models, and addresses\ud other functions, such as evaluating\ud past actions or correcting mistakes. Our\ud analysis can be used as a foundation for\ud improving models of tutoring dialogue

Year: 2006
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). An ISU dialogue system exhibiting reinforcement learning of dialogue policies: genericslot-lling in the TALK in-car system. doi
  2. (2004). ATK: An Application Toolkit for HTK, version 1.4. 200Author Index
  3. (2003). DIPPER: Description and Formalisation of an Information-State Update Dialogue System Architecture.
  4. (2004). Grammatical framework: A typetheoretical grammar formalism. doi
  5. (2005). Metafor: Visualizing stories as code.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.