Location of Repository

Sensory Impairment and recovery After Stroke

By Louise Anne Connell

Abstract

Sensory impairment is common after stroke though problems with the assessment of sensation have hindered research into sensation and its recovery. The revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment [NSA] (Lincoln et al, 1998) is a standardised assessment but there have been difficulties interpreting results, as it is not possible to calculate total scores. Therefore the purpose of this study was: - To investigate the extent of sensory impairment and recovery in stroke patients - To investigate if a total score for the NSA can be obtained - To explore the factors that are related to sensory impairment and outcome Method Patients with a first stroke were recruited on admission to two rehabilitation units in Nottingham. The NSA, which measures tactile sensations, proprioception and stereognostic ability, was administered on admission and at two, four and six months after stroke. Rasch analysis was used to examine if total scores of the NSA could be calculated. Results Seventy patients were recruited during a fifteen-month period. Mean age was 71 years (SD 10.00) and 36 were men. Sensory impairment was common in stroke patients and was significantly related to stroke severity. Stereognosis was the most frequently and severely impaired sensation. Rasch analysis enabled total scores of the NSA to be calculated. These totals showed significant recovery at six months post-stroke for upper limb tactile sensations, stereognosis and proprioception. Lower limb tactile sensations did not show significant recovery. The severity of the stroke, initial sensory impairment and activities of daily living ability were significantly related to sensory recovery, however they only accounted for 46-71% of the variance. Conclusion Sensation is a complex ability and a problem in its own right. Sensory impairment was a reflection of stroke severity but low variance indicates other factors were involved. Therefore there is a need to assess sensory impairment after stroke. Sensory outcome could not be accurately predicted, suggesting other potentially treatable factors such as cognitive and perceptual ability are involved. Rasch analysis allowed calculation of total scores, but also importantly allowed the scale to be shortened, making the NSA a more useable outcome measure.

Topics: RC Internal medicine
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.nottingham.ac.uk:247
Provided by: Nottingham eTheses

Recommendations

Preview

Citations

  1. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.
  2. (1993). A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life.
  3. (1993). A Controlled Trial of the Retraining of Sensory Function of the Hand.
  4. (1987). A follow-up study of stroke patients 5-6 years after their brain infarct.
  5. (1982). A motor relearning programme for stroke,
  6. (1982). A Rasch Model for partial credit scoring.
  7. (1993). A Review of Neuroplasticity: Some Implications for Physiotherapy in
  8. (1990). A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients.
  9. (2002). Activation of somatosensory cortical areas varies with attentional state: an fMRI study.
  10. (1997). Adaptive Plasticity in Primate Motor Cortex as a Consequence of Behavioral Experience and Neuronal Injury. Seminars in
  11. (1978). Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment, doi
  12. (1985). Age-related changes in propreioception and sensation of joint choice.
  13. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients.
  14. (1979). Assessment of motor function in stroke patients.
  15. (1995). Astereognosis and Dysfunction of the Primary Somatosensory (Si) Area - Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials (Sep) Data in Patients with Impaired Tactile Object Recognition.
  16. (1976). Astereognosis: Tactile Discrimination After Localized Hemispheric Lesions in Man.
  17. (1976). Astereognosis: Tactile Discrimination After Localized Hemispheris Lesions in Man.
  18. (1997). Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage.
  19. (1997). Behavioral, anatomical, and physiological aspects of recovery of motor function following stroke.
  20. (1985). Brain damage and neuroplasticity: mechanisms of recovery or development?
  21. (2000). Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation: The Willis lecure.
  22. (2003). Brain reorganisation after stroke.
  23. (1996). Burdens of disease.
  24. (2002). Cerebellar hemispheric activation ipsilateral to the paretic hand correlates with functional recovery after stroke.
  25. (1957). Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60.
  26. (1971). Cerebrovascular Diseases: Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation.
  27. (1978). Cerebrovascular disorders: a clinical and research classification. Geneva, World Health Organisation.
  28. (1991). Classification and natural history of clinical identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction.
  29. (1996). Comparing stroke incidence worldwide: what makes studies comparable?
  30. (1994). Comparison of clinical and neuroradiological findings in first-ever stroke: a population based study.
  31. (1994). Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study.
  32. (2000). Computational Model of the Role of Sensory Disorganization in Focal Task-Specific Dystonia.
  33. (2004). Constructing Measures: Am Item Response Modeling Approach,
  34. (1985). Convergence of sensory inputs in somatosensory cortex: Interactions from seperate afferent sources.
  35. (1989). Correlation between somatosensory evoked potentials and sensory disturbance in stroke patients.
  36. (1984). Cortical areas in man participating in somatosensory discrimination of microgeometric surface deviations and macrogeometric object differences.
  37. (1999). Cortical plasticity after stroke: Implications for rehabilitation.
  38. (1999). Crossmodal and sensorimotor integration in tactile awareness.
  39. (1999). Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke.
  40. (2002). Development and validation of two new sensory tests of the hand for patients with stroke.
  41. (1996). Discriminative Sensory Dysfunction After Unilateral Stroke.
  42. (1979). Disorders in somethesis following lesions of a parietal lobe.
  43. (1990). Disorders of motor control.
  44. (2004). Dissociating Detection from Localization of Tactile Stimuli.
  45. (2001). Dynamic organization of the somatosensory cortex induced by motor activity. doi
  46. (1996). Dynamic Touch.
  47. (1998). Effect of a Therapeutic Intervention for the Hemiplegic Upper Limb in the Acute Phase After Stroke : A SingleBlind, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial.
  48. (2003). Effectiveness of Sensory and Motor Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb Following the Principles of Neuroplasticity: Patients Stable Poststroke. doi
  49. (1993). Effects of selective attention of spatial form processing in monkey primary and secondary somatosensory cortex.
  50. (1999). Endogenous mechanisms of sensory modulation.
  51. (2003). Evaluation and treatment of sensory and perceptual impairments following stroke. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation,
  52. (1993). Extracting object properties through haptic exploration.
  53. (2005). Facilitation of sensory and motor recovery by thermal intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.
  54. (1999). Failure to recognise objects by touch (astereognosia) results from lesion of parietal-cortex representation of finger kinaesthesis.
  55. (1993). Fifty years of somatosensory research: From the Semmes-Weinstein monafilaments to the Weinstein enhanced sensory test.
  56. (1993). Fifty years of somatosensory research: From the Semmes-Winstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test.
  57. (1991). Focal capsular vascular lesions can selectively deafferent the prerolandic or the parietal cortex: Somatosensory evoked potentials evidence.
  58. (2002). Four Assumptions Of Multiple Regression That Researchers Should Always Test.
  59. (2002). From sensation to action.
  60. (1998). From sensation to cognition.
  61. (1965). Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index.
  62. (1987). Growth and plasticity of neural connections,
  63. (1987). Hand Movements: A Window into Haptic Object Recognition.
  64. (1990). Haptic classification of common objects: knowledge-driven exploration.
  65. (1993). Hemianopia, hemianaesthesia, and hemiplegia after right and left hemisphere damage. A hemispheric difference.
  66. (2002). How the brain works,
  67. (2000). How well does the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification predict the site and size of the infarct on brain imaging?
  68. (1997). Human physiology. From cells to systems,
  69. (1985). Identifying objects by touch: An "expert system".
  70. (1995). Identifying objects from a haptic glance.
  71. (1998). Impaired orientation in acute stroke: frequency, determinants, and time-course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Cerebrovasc Dis,
  72. (1999). Impaired Somatosensory Discrimination of Shape in Parkinson's Disease: Association With Caudate Nucleus Dopaminergic Function.
  73. (1997). Impaired Touch Discrimination After Stroke: A Quantitative Test.
  74. (1989). Impairment and recovery of ipsilateral sensory-motor function following unilateral cerebral infarction.
  75. (2004). Implementing evidence in clinical practice: the "therapies" dilemma.
  76. (1994). Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training.
  77. (1991). Incontinence after stroke.
  78. (2000). Inter-rater reliability of the Nottingham method of stereognosis assessment.
  79. (1999). Interaction between patient and physiotherapist: a qualitative study reflecting the physiotherapist's perspective.
  80. (1988). Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.
  81. (2000). Investigation of the functional correlates of reorginazition within the human somatosensory cortex.
  82. (1978). Kinesthetic sensibility.
  83. (1994). Long-term risk of recurrent stroke after a firstever stroke. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project [published erratum appears in Stroke doi
  84. (2002). Making sense of proprioception: The meaning of proprioception, kinasethesia and related terms.
  85. (2000). Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke.
  86. (1989). Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. doi
  87. (2003). Measuring Behaviours and Perceptions: Rasch Analysis as a Tool for Rehabilitation Research.
  88. (2000). Measuring Clinical Outcome in Stroke: Acute Care.
  89. (1996). Measuring Health - a Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires,
  90. (1997). Mechanisms of hand motor recovery after stroke: an electrophysiological study of central motor pathways.
  91. (1990). Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability.
  92. (1998). Motor cortex plasticity during constrain induced therapy in stroke patients.
  93. (1981). Motor deficits after left or right hemisphere damage due to stroke or tumor.
  94. (1999). Neural Pathways in tactile object recognition.
  95. (1982). Neural plasticity, part 4: Lesion induced reorganisation of the CNS.
  96. (2000). Neuromagnetic integrated methods tracking human brain mechanisms of sensorimotor areas 'plastic' reorganisation.
  97. (1997). Neuronal encoding of texture changes in primary and the secondary somatosensory cortical areas of monkeys during passive texture discrimination.
  98. (1995). Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.
  99. (1995). Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.
  100. (1998). Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch.
  101. (1996). Performance of the `Unaffected' Upper Extremity of Elderly Stroke Patients.
  102. (1988). Physical Rehabilitation: Assessment and Treatment, F A Davis Co.
  103. (2001). Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke.
  104. (1996). Predicting disability in stroke--a critical review of the literature.
  105. (1982). Predicting functional outcome following stroke using a standard clinical examination.
  106. (2000). Predicting outcome in acute stroke.
  107. (1981). Predictive correlation of urodynamic dysfunction and brain injury after cerebrovascular accident.
  108. (1997). Prevalence and risk factors of incontinence after stroke: the Copenhagen stroke study.
  109. (2000). Principles of Physiology,
  110. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and achievement tests,
  111. (1988). Prognostic indices in stroke.
  112. (1995). Prognostic significance of electrophysiological investigations in stroke patients: somatosensory and motor evoked potentials and sympathetic skin responses.
  113. (2004). Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugyl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients.
  114. (1983). Recovery after stroke.
  115. (2005). Recovery of somatosensory deficits in acute stroke.
  116. (1995). Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study.
  117. (1990). Rehabilitation after stroke.
  118. (1998). Rehabilitation of Movement: Theoretical Basis of Clinical Practice,
  119. (2003). Rehabilitation of Somatic Sensation and Related Deficit of Motor Control in Patients with Pure Sensory Stroke.
  120. (2001). Relationship between sensorimotor tasks and the stages of recovery of hand function following stroke.
  121. (1998). Reliability and Revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for Stroke Patients.
  122. (2002). Remodeling of somotasensory hand representations following cerebral lesions in humans.
  123. (1997). Reorganisation of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke.
  124. (2002). Representation of orientation in the somatosensory system.
  125. (2002). Restoring movement and functional ability poststroke: now and the future.
  126. (2004). Restoring Neurological Function: Putting the neurosciences to work in neurorehabilitation.
  127. (2000). Role of sensory deficits in motor impairments after injury to primary motor cortex.
  128. (1973). Self-observations and neuroanatomical considerations after a stroke. doi
  129. (1979). Sensation and Perception,
  130. (1991). Sensibility Testing,
  131. (1990). Sensibility testing: State of the art.
  132. (1996). Sensory Abnormalities After Stroke.
  133. (1994). Sensory deficit in the hands of children with cerebral palsy: a new look at assessment and prevalence.`.
  134. (1995). Sensory detection without localization.
  135. (1938). Sensory discrimination in monkey, chimpanzee, and man after lesions of the parietal lobe.
  136. (1993). Sensory loss in Stroke patients: Effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination.
  137. (1988). Sensory loss in the hand after stroke: Therapeutic Rationale.
  138. (2001). Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions.
  139. (1978). Sensory Processing, Perception, and Behaviour,
  140. (2000). Sensory Re-education of the Hand After Stroke, London and Philadelphia,
  141. (2001). Sensory systems: Editorial overview.
  142. (2000). Sensory systems.
  143. (1960). Somatosensory changes after penetrating brain wounds in man, Cambridge,
  144. (1960). Somatosensory Changes after Penetrating Brain Wounds in Man. Cambridge,
  145. (1987). Somatosensory detection in patients with circumscribed lesions of the brain.
  146. (1987). Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia after localized lesions of the cerebral hemispheres in man.
  147. (1995). Somatosensory Loss after Stroke. Crit Reviews
  148. (1970). Somatosensory thresholds: contrasting effects of post-central gyrus and posterior parietal lobe excisions.
  149. (1986). Somesthetic sensitivity in young and elderly humans.
  150. (2000). Specific changes in somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during recovery from sensorimotor stroke.[comment].
  151. (2000). Standards of Physiotherapy - Core Standards,
  152. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.,
  153. (1985). Steps to Follow: A Guide to the treatment and Rehabilitation of Adult Hemiplegia,
  154. (1993). Stereognosis and Neuropsychological Function in Multiple Sclerosis.
  155. (2004). Stroke : the comprehensive and medically accurate manual about stroke and how to deal with it London,
  156. (1994). Stroke (acute cerebrovascular disease). Heath care needs assessment.
  157. (2006). Stroke rehabilitation in Europe: what do physiotherapists and occupational therapists actually do?
  158. (1994). Stroke Rehabilitation. 5. Stroke Outcome.
  159. (1995). Stroke: Issues in Recovery and Rehabilitation.
  160. (1986). Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management,
  161. (1993). Tactile and proprioceptive discrimination loss after stroke: Training effects and quantitative measurement.
  162. (1986). Tactual Perception. IN
  163. (1993). The assessment and treatment of patients who have sensory loss following cortical lesions. [Review] [81 refs].
  164. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study.
  165. (1988). The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability?
  166. (1999). The cerebellum contributes to somatosensory cortical activity during selfproduced tactile stimulation. doi
  167. (1983). The effects of sensation and motivation on regaining movement control following stroke.
  168. (2006). The Erasmus MC modifications to the (revised) Nottingham Sensory Assessment: a reliable somatosensory assessment measure for patients with intracranial disorders.
  169. (1992). The Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale: a further validation.
  170. (1983). The hemiplegic are after stroke: measurement and recovery.
  171. (2004). The impact of somatosensory function on activity performance and length of hospital stay in geriatric patients with stroke.
  172. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for catergorical data.
  173. (1975). The Natural History of Stroke.
  174. (1998). The neurobiology of stroke rehabilitation.
  175. (2001). The organization of sensory cortex.
  176. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of physical performance.
  177. (1982). The Principles and Practice of Medicine,
  178. (1981). The rate and recovery from stroke and its measurement.
  179. (1979). The recovery of discriminative sensation after stroke in the elderly.
  180. (2000). The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke.
  181. (1982). The Relationship Between Sensory Impairment and Motor Recovery in Patients with Hemiplegia.
  182. (1993). The reliability of stroke outcome measures.
  183. (2002). The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardisation and reliability data.
  184. (1986). The role of afferent input in the reduction of spasticity: an hypothesis.
  185. (1997). The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in acute stroke patients.
  186. (2001). The temporal profile of interactions between sensory information from both hand in the second somatosensory cortex.
  187. (1991). The unreliability of sensory assessment.
  188. (1991). The unsolved problem: How to test the functional value of hand sensibility.
  189. (1996). The validity of a simple clinical classification of acute ischaemic stroke.
  190. (1996). Thumb-pointing in humans after damage to somatic sensory cortex.
  191. (2003). Treating sensory impairments in the post-stroke upper limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. Results of a preliminary trial.
  192. (1999). Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Results of a factor analysis.
  193. (1992). Understanding neuromuscular plasticity, a basis for clinical rehabilitation,
  194. (2001). Unilateral Spatial Neglect.
  195. (1994). Use of outcome measures in physiotherapy: survey of current practice.
  196. (1993). Use of the Extended ADL scale with stroke patients.
  197. (1983). Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index.
  198. (1994). Validation of a clinical classification for subtypes of acute cerebral infarction.
  199. (1987). Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first three months.
  200. (1999). What determines good recovery in patients with the most severe strokes? The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

If you think this content is not provided as Open Access according to the BOAI definition then please contact us immediately.