Article thumbnail

Guilt and shame through recipients' eyes: The moderating effect of blame

By Roger Giner-Sorolla, Caroline Kamau and Emanuele Castano

Abstract

Previous research has found that people collectively wronged by an outgroup take insult when its representative offers compensation, and that an expression of shame but not guilt can lower such insult. This experiment showed a moderating factor: strength of outgroup blame. Black community members were participants, presented with an apology for discriminatory searches of Blacks by the police. The effects – that shame but not guilt reduces insult from compensation – were replicated only among those who strongly blamed outgroup entities. As before, these effects emerged only on insult rather than satisfaction measures, and only when compensation was offered. When blamed by the public, an official body should therefore consider how much its apology conveys shame rather than guilt

Topics: Sociology, Law, History, Psychology, Criminology and Policing
Publisher: 'Hogrefe Publishing Group'
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000013
OAI identifier: oai:ssudl.solent.ac.uk:1408
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://ssudl.solent.ac.uk/id/... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.